Senate Aiming for Our Guns

SandyHookBookPerennial hypocrite Senator Dianne Feinstein from the Insane Peoples’ Republic of California is coming after guns – again.  She has a history of attacking the Second Amendment’s foundations with attempts to demonize certain types of firearms and seeking legislation banning sales and possession of guns.  She is also registered to carry a concealed firearm.  It’s okay for her, but you’re not trustworthy.

A well-intended citizen might read her newest proposal, penned in the aftermath of the Newtown tragedy, and think that the provisions therein don’t seem that extreme.  We all want to be safe, right?  Nobody wants to live in the “wild West” that Democrats love to invoke when discussing “gun reform”.  I mean, who really needs an “assault rifle” besides the military?  Why should ordinary citizens have access to military-style weaponry and all the accoutrements?  Never mind that those weapons don’t have the same capability as the ones issued to our soldiers.  They “look” scary, so ban them.  The same goes for magazine sizes. Who needs seventeen or thirty-shot capacity? 

The full version of this column is now only available in Doug Giles’ book, “Sandy Hook Massacre: When Seconds Count, The Police Are Minutes Away”.

Nathan Clark

About the author, Nathan Clark: Nathan Clark is a conservative commentator who resides with his wife in New Hampshire. He is passionate about preserving the vision of our nation's Founders and advancing those tried and true principles deep into America's future. His interests range broadly from flyfishing, cooking and shooting to pro sports, gardening, live music and fine-scale modeling. View all articles by Nathan Clark

Like Clash? Like Clash.

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.