Alex Jones to Piers Morgan: 1776 Will Commence If You Try to take Our Firearms

Piers Morgan was played by Alex Jones and I enjoyed the show LOL.

OOH RAH, way to go Alex. Everything you said was spot on. Semper Fi

The original article says that Alex Jones lost it and was yelling…just a taste of what morgan did to his other guests, in my opinion. Morgan deserved to be shouted down. Drive the foreigner out of the country. Stop patronizing his sponsors, and let them know you are doing so. As a non citizen, he does not necessarily have the rights of a citizen.

Jones came off as a screaming hysteric and did more harm to your cause than a truckload of AR-15s parked next to a nursery school. Got anybody more rational to put on TV?

On Monday night’s CNN broadcast of the
barely-watched Piers Morgan show, infowarrior Alex Jones handed Piers
Morgan his best ratings ever. He also “lost his cool,” according
to the mainstream media which blasted Jones all day Tuesday, trying
to paint him as a radical with “dangerous” ideas… y’know,
like those insane ideas outlined in the U.S. Bill of Rights.

And yet, in those fifteen or so minutes that CNN producers even
allowed Alex to remain on the show before kicking him off the set,
Alex managed to broadcast a massive collection of truths that you
normally never hear anywhere on the mainstream media:
the dangers of psychiatric drugs, why true Americans will fight for
their Second Amendment rights and so on.

Media elitists are calling Alex Jones “bonkers” and “crazy.”
But the more I thought about it, the more I realized Piers
Morgan is far crazier than Alex Jones. Here’s why…

Twelve reasons why Piers Morgan is crazier than Alex Jones

#1) Piers Morgan stands for globalist lies, propaganda and
teleprompter-scripted fake news. Alex Jones stands for real news,
with all its unscripted passion and spontaneous outrage. Which of
these is crazier?

#2) Piers Morgan thinks slaves are supposed to be “polite”
while they’re being stripped of their self defense and human
rights. That’s crazy! Alex Jones recognizes the threat and says
“HELL NO!” and shatters the false matrix of civil obedience.

#3) If Piers Morgan has a problem with you, he’ll wait for you
to leave and then say nasty things behind your back. If Alex Jones
has a problem with you, he’ll just come right out and say it to
your face. Which is more honest?

#4) Piers
Morgan stands for higher ratings. Alex Jones stands for
principles upon which our nation was founded. Is that crazy?

#5) Piers Morgan is the kind of globalist coward that would
arm-twist someone else into fighting for him. He’s got armed
bodyguards, after all. Alex
Jones never has bodyguards and he would fight any man with bare
fists. Or, if Alex were part of your fire team, he would pick up a
rifle like everyone else and march straight to the front lines. Okay,
that might be a little crazy,
but it’s at least the kind of crazy you want on your team! Morgan
is a coward. Jones is a man of courage.

#6) Piers Morgan thinks the process of enslaving and oppressing
people must remain “civil” and “proper.” How crazy is that?
Alex Jones thinks oppressed people must fight back at any cost to
protect the liberty of future generations and beat back tyranny. That
makes more sense than anything I’ve ever heard coming out of CNN!

#7) Piers Morgan thinks America would be better if it were a lot
more like Britain, with all its violent muggings, police state
surveillance and total censorship by insanely oppressive monarchy.
That’s insane! Alex Jones thinks America would be better if it were
a lot more like the Republic, where all men are created equal and
there is no silly king or queen claiming some sort of spooky,
superstitious “divine right” to rule over everyone else.

#8) Piers Morgan thinks that his First Amendment overrides your
Second Amendment. Loonville, isn’t it? Alex Jones believes that
both the First and Second Amendments are immutable, divine rights
that can never be stripped from anyone. That makes total sense to me!

#9) Piers Morgan fled a media empire in the UK after being accused
of involvement in a criminal hacking fraud. Sounds crazy, but it’s
true. Alex Jones built his own media empire from the ground up by
telling the truth, and he flees no one.

#10) Piers Morgan demands total obedience to corrupt, criminal
authority. Alex Jones believes in total DIS-obedience to false
authority.

#11) Piers Morgan represents the same insanely power-hungry
redcoat traitors who once tried to disarm, enslave and rule over
colonial America. Alex Jones represents the sound-minded rebellious
patriots who rightfully shot and killed the redcoats in order to
declare independence from tyranny. Piers Morgan thinks 1776 was a
terrible loss for his country. Alex Jones knows that 1776 was a great
victory for his. Who is more sane now?

#12) Piers Morgan eats buttered scones with light toast for
breakfast. Alex Jones devours tyrants as a scrumptious snack.

Ben Swann Destroys Piers Morgan’s Anti-Gun Argument
http://www.fox19.com/story/20538164/piers-morgan-vs-alex-jones-the-truth-about-gun-homicide-rates

I have a LOT of reservatons about Jones – but it was wonderful to see him obliterate the Alinksy-style tactics Morgan attempted to use. It’s wonderful too behold a White man that has not been rendered into a grovelling Commie eunich.
England is much futher down the totalitarian road, than the USA. The “Governments” of both Nations DESPISE the citizenry. The inidenous White population of the UK is being systematical replaced with Pakistani Muslims. The English are BRUTALIZED if they utter a peep. A schoolgirl was arrested, taken away in handcuffs, and jailed because she asked to be placed in a study group where in the other children speak English. None of the other kids spoke English, IN England. A GIRL was jailed for wanting to speak in her own language. I know English folks that are trying to fight their own literal extermination – but it’s very hard to do, when one is utterly defenseless.
Morgan is way beyond a mere disgrace. He’s actually EVIL. Hes a minion of the Devil. I’m not exaggerating. He’s EVIL.

I want to be crazy, crazy like Alex Jones

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU0cplwlOZU

Vermont Town Hall erupts in anger when Democratic legislature issues assault weapons ban

http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/01/08/vermont-town-hall-erupts-over-gun-ban

Alex made some great points, but came across as a ranting lunatic! There is passionate, and there is over-the-top! Yes, Morgan was a prick to Larry Pratt, and tried to be to Uncle Ted and Jesse, but unlike Alex, both Ted Nuggent and Jesse Ventura both kept their cool while destorying Pier’s moronic arguments against the 2nd Amendment! In my opinion Alex detracted from the truth concerning crime statistic by screaming like mad-man at Piers. The counter, to Piers’ facts about firearm deaths in England, had Alex not been so out-of-control, but which he almost stumbled upon, would to have said, “Does it matter how you murder someone? When you stab someone to death, is that really better than being shot to death? Had the man that killed those children in Sandy Hook, had walked in with a baseball bat, he could have killed all the children and adults he did, the only difference is the murderer would have been a bit more winded, and wouldn’t have been able to commit suicide.” There has been a rash attempted school massacres in China as well, but we don’t hear about that, because they are using machetes and in one instant, a man drove his car through a group of eigth graders to try and kill as many as he could.

Alex had his facts and could have really toasted Piers with his facts, but Alex didn’t help our side (Constitutionalist), one bit when it is all said and done, simply because he came across as an out-of-control, raven lunatic… the kind of man who shouldn’t have a firearm on him!

These aguments would all be useless if our president would do his jod defend the constitution of the United States .He swore an oath to do this . If he doesn’t he should be booted out of office . I’m ready to fight to take our country back if thats what it takes. My oppinion only . they said at first the AR15 at Sandy Hook was found in the car not in posession of the shooter . When they try to take our gun rights away all of a sudden the AR15 appears . Then they blame the one gun one that wasn’t even used. Blame the people realy responsable for these murders . THE US GOVERENMENT AND CIA. . Check internet CIA/DEVELS DUST scroll to CIA mind control its there read it. All these shootings and deaths are just collateral dammage to a bigger picture of world controll.

WOW…It was fun to see Piers get stomped on. I do agree with the part of our rights to own guns. However, it’s hard for me to even consider that 911 tragedy was set up by Washington. I draw my own line of beliefs. Just saying…

I think it’s time moron morgan left our country….we are quite sick of hearing his name…we don’t watch CNN so we’ve never seen him, but the media coverage is sickening, boring and unnewsworthy. He’s a fool……

I have posted the following several times on different sites because I feel it is the most powerful argument that can be presented to our members of congress and other public officials at all levels. I have added one more sentence to the emails or letters I send. Actually a letter sent by snail mail is more effective as many emails are just deleted by some staffer. Loads of envelopes piling up are hard to ignore. Feel free to cut and paste it into an email or preferably a snail mail letter.
Sorry it is so long but I felt the meaning should be absolutely clear.
*** Added sentence:
If you, as one of my representatives in public office, do anything to negate any portion of my unalienable rights as contained in the Second Amendment of The Constitution of These United States of America; I will do everything in my power to make sure you are never elected to any public office in the future. If you are still not convinced of the true meaning of the Second Amendment, “MOLON LABE”.
Second Amendment meaning:
“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.” James Madison
Second Amendment in context:
***”The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. They deserve a place of honor with all that is good. When firearms go, all goes. We need them every hour.” – George Washington in address to the 2nd session of the United States Congress.
***“Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth.” (George Washington)
***”The right of self-defense is the first law of nature; in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.” Henry St. George Tucker, in Blackstone’s 1768 “Commentaries on the Laws of England.”, Judge of the Virginia Supreme Court & U.S. Dist. Court of Virginia

***”Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria
Those who argue that the Second Amendment was written just for militias are completely blown out of the water by the following quote from Thomas Jefferson.
“The strongest reason for “people” (My emphasis) to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 (C. J. Boyd, Ed., 1950)
James Madison is credited with the writing of the “Bill of Rights” and was pretty clear about the meaning on the Second Amendment.
“The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the “PEOPLE” (My emphasis) with arms.”
Here are a few others who help define the true meaning of the Second Amendment. It becomes very clear upon the examination of the meanings attached to the Second Amendment by our Founding Fathers that the original intent of the Second Amendment is being attacked in order to eventually disarm the American people.
***”I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.”
George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
***”Whereas civil-rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as military forces, which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.”
– Tench Coxe, in Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution
***”Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
–Tenche Coxe, an American political economist and a delegate for Pennsylvania to the Continental Congress, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.
***”The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”
– Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188
***”That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms … ”
– Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)
***”Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.”
–Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787).
***”No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
– Thomas Jefferson, Proposal Virginia Constitution, 1 T. Jefferson Papers, 334,[C.J. Boyd, Ed., 1950]
***” … to disarm the people – that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
– George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380
***”The right [to bear arms] is general. It may be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent. The militia, as has been explained elsewhere, consists of those persons who, under the laws, are liable to the performance of military duty, and are officered and enrolled for service when called upon…. [I]f the right were limited to those enrolled, the purpose of the guarantee might be defeated altogether by the action or the neglect to act of the government it was meant to hold in check. The meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people, from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for the purpose. But this enables the government to have a well-regulated militia; for to bear arms implies something more than mere keeping; it implies the learning to handle and use them in a way that makes those who keep them ready for their efficient use; in other words, it implies the right to meet for voluntary discipline in arms, observing in so doing the laws of public order.”
– Thomas M. Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law, Third Edition [1898]
Then there are politicians who insist in taking our Constitution out of context of time and original meaning. Once again, James Madison warned us against this.
“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”
Second Amendment:
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Arms, in the context and time when our Constitution was written meant the usual arms carried by militia members, everyday citizens or light infantry in the Continental Army. Many of these arms were supplied by their owners for militia duty and were personal weapons initially used for hunting or home defense. They came in all types and calibers; from a 30 cal. squirrel rifle to a 75 cal. smooth bore musket, pistols and shotguns of all types, calibers and gauges. They also included a huge variety of other arms including: knives of every conceivable shape and size, bayonets and swords. Many early citizens also carried tomahawks.
Attempts to control the type and or caliber of arms Americans’ can possess are absolutely against The Constitution and the Second Amendment as it was written and intended. By the supreme law of the land (The Constitution), an American citizen should be able to keep and bear any weapon now used individually by our light infantry soldiers.
Larger weapons such as cannon and mortars that required more than one person to operate were considered to be “ordinance”.
Words have meanings! If those meanings are bastardized all becomes chaos.
Definition of to keep: to hold or retain in one’s possession; hold as one’s own.
Definition of to bear: to carry, transmit, transport, have a characteristic of and exhibit.
Definition of INFRINGE: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another.
Why is this so hard to understand? The meaning of the words in the Second Amendment have not changed since the amendment was ratified.
I am not aware of the Second Amendment being repealed or amended.
In reference to arms control by the states; the Fourteenth Amendment Section .1. is crystal clear.
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; (My emphasis) nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Many in politics and or judges cite “precedent” as a justification for the violations of our rights as contained in The Constitution of These United States of America. Precedent only describes what has been done, not if it was done in compliance with the supreme law of the land or in accordance with the oath of office to uphold The Constitution.

You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… When smoking Pot is legal and widely accepted But smoking tobacco is treated like a criminal offense.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if…. You can get arrested for expired tags on your car but not for being in the country illegally.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… Your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend trillions more of our money.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… A seven year old boy can be thrown out of school for calling his teacher “cute” but hosting a sexual exploration or diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if.. The Supreme Court of the United States can rule that lower courts cannot display the 10 Commandments in their courtroom, while sitting in front of a display of the 10 Commandments.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if.. Children are forcibly removed from parents who appropriately discipline them while children of “underprivileged” drug addicts are left to rot in filth infested cesspools.
========================================
You know you live in country controlled by communists if.. Working class Americans pay for their own health care (and the health care of everyone else) while unmarried women are free to have child after child on the “State’s” dime while never being held responsible for their own choices.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… Hard work and success are rewarded with higher taxes and government intrusion, while slothful, lazy behavior is rewarded with EBT cards, WIC checks, Medicaid and subsidized housing, and free cell phones.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… The government’s plan for getting people back to work is to provide 99 weeks of unemployment checks (to not work).
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… Being self-sufficient is considered a threat to the government.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… Politicians think that stripping away the amendments to the constitution is really protecting the rights of the people.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… The rights of the Government come before the rights of the individual.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… Parents believe the State is responsible for providing for their children.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… You can write a post like this just by reading the news headlines.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… Being stripped of the ability to defend yourself makes you “safe”.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.
========================================
You know you live in a country controlled by communists if… An 80 year old woman can be stripped searched by the TSA but a Muslim woman in a burka is only subject to having her neck and head searched.
========================================
You know you live in a Country controlled by communists if.. Using the “N” word is considered “hate speech” but writing and singing songs about raping women and killing cops is considered “art”.
======

The ONLY thing that I heard that I don’t think has ANYTHING to do with “Guns in America” was Morgan’s (and the lame-stream media) diversionary tactic, used when he(they) couldn’t push his(their) bs agenda, and that was 9/11. Otherwise, he cleaned Morgan’s clock and hung his arse out to dry.
The most valid of the points being that the fewer the guns the greater the crime/murder rate. Uncontestable.
The greater the PRIVATE ownership of guns the lower the crime/murder rate. Uncontestable.
The countries that surrendered their firearms suffered the highest death rate at the hands of their own governments. Uncontestable.
England’s giving up it’s private guns has increased the crime and murder rates. Uncontestable. (Now they’re trying to ban sharp knives and one’s with POINTED (to prevent stabbing, yet!) ends. And they wonder why they’ve fallen into a LOW 2nd rate country- and soon to be a third-rate one.
The problem is that you can’t quote statistics to idiots who won’t listen. Maybe if we just put them all into Chicago and sealed off it’s borders? If nothing else, STATISTICALLY a bunch of them would get murdered. Or be the victim of a shooting or an armed robbery.
Sounds like a plan to me! (And we’ll be sure Feinstein, Murphy, Biden, Obama (AND all of his family), Boxer, and the rest of those who voted even ONCE on gun control, are included. WITHOUT their armed bodyguards or security.)

Alex Jones is a paranoid nut. Period. He made an ass of himself of national TV and gave that English prick more fuel as he can make the ‘Prison Planet’ douche bag the poster child for gun owners. Alex couldn’t keep his ADD under control and was ranting like a mad-man. He offered to pick a fight with Piers Morgan with him wearing the red white and blue shorts and Piers wearing the Jolly Roger? Really? So much for intelligent debate.

He couldn’t keep his thoughts straight and was screaming about suicide pills and the New World Order instead of staying focused on topic.

Alex couldn’t answer the question about how many handgun deaths in England.

I guess he feels he doesn’t have come prepared to a debate.

Score one for the Liberal…Thanks for nothing Alex, you should have stayed in your cave and screamed into a bucket.
Someone said that Piers Mogran is the crazy one. NO, he’s not. He’s an arrogant, elitist twat. He’s weak, he’s a evil, self-serving man. But far not crazy.
Alex…yes…you are crazy. You are also arrogant and a self-serving twat, for thinking you could come on a major News network, unprepared, unorganized and unabashed, and then think that anyone with a sane mind would listen to you. This is why you only have about 235 followers.

Please stay in your cave and let the grownups fight the fight.

I haven’t watched the interview but have seen snippets from other sources. I never like to see anyone shout and rant but when dealing with liberals who call people names because of their views I can see why they sometimes have to. Otherwise the liberals will belittle and denigrate them. Case in point: what Morgan did to Larry Pratt. Unconscionable! Yet noone in the media that I have heard has condemned Morgan for his name calling.

Folks I think talking is almost over soon enough one may have to bear arms to remove the traitor Obama and crew.

Piers looked afraid . . . which he is.

I have a new respect for Jones.

All of the finger pointing and complainging about Morgan and fellow leftists has accomplished nothing as far as they are concerned. They just point back.
The one thing that nobody, including them can stand is to be made into laughing stocks.
I’m not saying that it is the only road to take, but it is the road not yet taken.

The guy sounded a little nuts, but that is true.

I’m a gun owner and a registered Republican… but there’s no way in hell I’m getting behind this 9/11 “truther.” Sorry. He came off crazy and made all of us in the pro-gun camp look bad. I can’t believe anyone outside of the conspiracy theorist fringe would have anything nice to say about him.