• Darrell G. Walton

    Couldn’t agree more!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/Eagleslove William Dedee

    Same applies here – poor judgement on your part WILL result in your losing your life.

  • Marge

    I’m with you little mamma…we need more like you that know how to take care of business!

  • $22091572

    Shes right!!!

  • jeepdude911

    Ditto.

  • http://blaze.com/ mathchopper

    This lady needs to be reported to Dumbocraps like Weinstein. The nerve of her… thinking she has the right to defend herself without “911″ and the guv’met’s help.

  • harleyrider1989

    Not even Heinstein could convict a protective mom killing to save her babies! But whats diferent if a man protects his family,home and property for the same reasons! NONE

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jhon-Kacan/100003185883958 Jhon Kacan

    Friends,let me told a few trues and error a lot peoples commit.I am a former especial Cop and have a police trainee,plus trainee for kill.If you found some one inside of your home or outside property,you NO have a rigth to shoot to kill,only in case if another have a weapon or some thing can you harm.only in that condition you can,because self defence is not to easy prove in a Court,your word is NOT value until you have a evidences,like you shoot,police come and found a dead guy arm or some kind of weapon,or he was shoot you and fail,after this you shoot and kill,a evidences was in a weapon of intruder,if he was use a shoot abullit found a police and that is your evidence of self defence.In my old Country Cops shoot illegals unarm any one and after he are dead put in his hand a weapon,Cop there carry many diffrent confiscate weapon and show to a prosecutor,see he was have a weapon and we self defences,many time a prosecutor suspect wrong,but can prove nothing,that is a real dirty Cop.Another thing,pull you over,no witness,you carry a weapon,he can shoot you to kill and protect herself if lie,Court be will believe him not you.I told what i was learn.If you shoot any one and don’t have no evidences of self defend you will go to prision for murder in a second degree and carry 25 to life in prision.When I was on trainee I remember a instructor was said,before pull a trigger thing very well,after is to late for said sorry.

    • 19gundog43

      Dude you cannot even write a coherent sentence without misspelling and grammar errors let alone give
      advise on self defense. You are a ignorant kook. Learn to speak and write English first. LMAO!

  • Dawn

    I’m with her. No problem putting a bullet
    between the eyes of the intruder.

  • GDC

    Then we have prosecutors like Angela B Corey who had a woman convicted when she WAS just defending herself and her children. If you do NOT know it Angela B. Corey IS the one prosecuting George Zimmerman a truly INNOCENT person!!!

  • coastx

    Just a Shotgue !

    True Story From Another Site

    You’re sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door.

    Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers.

    At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way.

    With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.

    You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it.

    In the darkness, you make out two shadows.

    One holds something that looks like a crowbar.

    When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire on shell.

    The blast knocks both thugs to the floor.

    One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.

    As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you’re in trouble.

    In
    your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that
    are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them
    useless..

    Yours was never registered.

    Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died.

    They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm.

    When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.

    “What kind of sentence will I get?” you ask.

    “Only ten-to-twelve years,” he replies, as if that’s nothing.

    “Behave yourself, and you’ll be out in seven.”

    The
    next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.
    Somehow, you’re portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men
    you shot are represented as choirboys.

    Their friends and relatives can’t find an unkind word to say about them..

    Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both “victims” have been arrested numerous times.

    But the next day’s headline says it all:

    “Lovable Rogue Son Didn’t Deserve to Die.”

    The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters..

    As the days wear on, the story takes wings.

    The national media picks it up, then the international media.

    The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.

    Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he’ll probably win.

    The
    media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several
    times in the past and that you’ve been critical of local police for
    their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.

    After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time.

    The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

    A few months later, you go to trial.

    The charges haven’t been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.

    When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you..

    Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man.

    It doesn’t take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.

    The judge sentences you to life in prison.

    This case really happened.

    On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second.

    In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term…

    How did it become a crime to defend one’s own life in the once great British Empire ?

    It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

    This
    seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons
    and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had
    a license.

    The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns..

    Later
    laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by
    private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

    Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerfordmass shooting in 1987.

    Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw.

    When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

    The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of “gun control”, demanded even tougher restrictions.

    (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

    Nine
    years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a
    semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public
    school.

    For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals.

    Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners.

    Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns.

    The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.

    During
    the years in which the British government incrementally took away most
    gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed
    self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.

    Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened,
    claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a
    gun.

    Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.

    Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying,

    “We cannot have people take the law into their own hands.”

    All of Martin’s neighbors had been robbed numerous times,

    and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences.

    Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.

    When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.

    Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law.

    The few who didn’t were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn’t comply.

    Police later bragged that they’d taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

    How did the authorities know who had handguns?

    The guns had been registered and licensed.

    Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?

    WAKE UP AMERICA ; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

    “…It
    does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
    minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds..”

    –Samuel Adams

    If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know.

    You had better wake up, because Obama is doing this very same thing, over here, if he can get it done

    The UN Small Arms Treaty that Hilary is negotiating would take away our 2nd Amendment rights.
    And there are stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along with him.

  • Sagebrush6

    The cops around here tell you to just wright a report after the perpatrator leaves and they will look into it. That’s all they will do. Nothing more.
    Personally, I take her stand. Kill the MF and deal with the cops later.

  • McFerguson

    Lock’n load! If somebody breaks in, aim and fire and continue to fire until movement ceases.

  • Arationofreason

    Your are in good company, mom.

    NRA-ILA | Armed Citizen

    http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/armed-citizen.aspx

    Screen clipping taken: 12/30/2012 7:50 PM

  • slickzip

    AMEN ,,,,, I agree kill the dirty thug that breaks into your home and call the police to come clean up the trash ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  • Mutt

    Better to be tried by twelve than to be carried by six.

SHAME ON SHAME? Well, Perhaps Not Always
NO PLEASING THIS BUNCH: Date Rape Nail Polish Rejected
SOBERING: This Altercation With A Muslim In The UK Should Be A Wake Up Call to America (VIDEO)
Load more