About the author: Doug Giles

Doug Giles is the Big Dawg at ClashDaily.com and the Co-Owner of The Safari Cigar Company. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter. And check out his new book, Rise, Kill and Eat: A Theology of Hunting from Genesis to Revelation.

View all articles by Doug Giles

  • Erica

    Great buck. Stay strong!

  • Can’tTrustEm

    My buddy has access to some Army surplus munitions and killed a boar with a LAW. Wasn’t much boar left but sure was funny! We should be able to hunt with a tank if we want, and the government should decriminalize dynamite fishing – get off our backs!!

    • edc

      You sound like the kind of person that these crazies try to make us all sound like. You seem to want to kill for the “fun” of killing. We need guns for protection and hunting and shooting, NOT the joy of killing. There should never be “joy” at the death of another creature, only thanks for provisions or protection.

      • nate forrest

        He’s a Troll…..pay him no mind.

        • Can’tTrustEm

          Sorry Libs, I ain’t POLITICALLY CORRECT. Enjoy the inauguration of your fraud president. Hope that gun control works out for ya

      • Billy Hill

        I praise the taste of each creature I shoot cause I’m a member of PETA(People eating tasty animals)

      • Arthur mackey

        That is your opinion and we all know about opinions !

    • Billy Hill

      Dynamite fishing ain’t legal?When did they do that.Dam,you mean I been breakin the law

  • Bulldog74

    Considering that most liberals seem unable to grasp such simple concepts as “semi-automatic” vs “fully automatic,” I’d say that disrespect for their opinions is a good call.

    • JT

      Except with *bump* firing, a semi automatic becomes a fully automatic.

      • Bulldog74

        True to a point…but wouldn’t using the recoil necessarily degrade accuracy? While the shooter would be able to get off more rounds, wouldn’t they tend to go high and miss targets? (I’m not an expert, I’m just asking).
        My point was that so many of these people seem to base their understanding on Hoolywood (you know, where Arnold goes into the gun shop and buys the 9mm Uzi off the rack).

        • http://www.facebook.com/arthur.mackey Arthur Mackey

          Yes your accuracy would be severely limited and in most cases very high ! I am not a certified expert but a Vietnam veteran with over twenty confirmed kills in Vietnam and Cambodia with the M4A1 rifle, the fully automatic military version of an AR 15 semi-automatic weapon !

        • disgusted demacrat

          or buys a 9mm glock with a 10 round mag. then shoots 43 people without a reload! Hum!!

      • ArmedPatriot

        uh…no..they dont…one trigger pull = one shot fired. The bump fire simply allows for quicker trigger pulls.

  • mclantiere

    The AR-15 semi-auto tactical rifle is simply the product of technology evolution for
    “long guns” common to “Regular” military foot soldiers. The Founders wanted the Citizen to own and maintain firearms consistent with the “issue” weapons of the military. BTW: this would not include RPGs, bazookas, cannons, road-side bombs, or atomic bombs, as those devices were not “common” to the “Regulars” (as in the term “well
    REGULATED militia” in the 2nd Amendment.) Long Guns (muskets, in those days) were common.

    It’s no different than the evolution from horse & buggy to the F-150 pick-up truck – the evolution of technology in which 37,000 /year die on American roads — a situation that did not exist in 1863 (150 years ago.) Nor did anyone foresee Alexander Graham Bell’s “telephone” invention turning into the iPhone. However, the fatal mix of F-150 and iPhone texting is not grounds for banning either one — but to call for LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY and USE of these devices.

    The 2nd amendment is not about sportsman, duck-hunting, or target shooting. GUNS in the hands of CITIZENS — tempers the ambitions of an aggressive GOVERNMENT. THAT is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

    • Phillip_in_TX

      There are two ways to persuade people:

      1. Persuasion

      2. Force

      If we are equal (armed) you cannot persuade me, nor I you, using force. Therefore, we would have to use the power of “persuasion” to accomplish whatever our goal is.

      Now, if you want to see what happens when option # 2 belongs only to the Government or a group of thugs (actually, that is one in the same). Watch the video “Innocents Betrayed.”


      • Arizona_Don

        Thanks Phillip for the site address. The one I had for this was scrubbed for some reason. I have the video but on occasion like to send it to those who are not quite up to speed on the subject of gun control. Of course liberals progressives don’t or won’t watch it. Goes against their grain to find out the real facts.

        Thanks again – Don

        • Phillip_in_TX

          Your welcome Sir, any time.

      • CJONE

        Hard to watch. Thanks for the site because it is well worth watching. I will pass it on. I knew about the Indians and the Jews but the others I didn’t. How horrible is to know that greed and someone to want power so bad that they will kill so many. Lots of sick people in power and will do anything keep it. Everyone write your senators!!!!!!!!

        • Phillip_in_TX

          It is hard; however, the truth is hard to see at times. Remember when they wanted to remove all the 9/11 videos because they were too tough to watch? The video only covers some of the tragedies that have taken place. Plus, they continue to take place today.

      • Berzrkr50

        I just recently watch that flick and was impressed. Impressed and fearful at what could happen to us if we become complacent and let the government roll all over us. I have no intention of letting that happen… We need to stand tall and tell the “Man” no thank you, I don’t need no stinkin’ control!

    • polmutant

      any weapon the government has the people should have. otherwise it is bringing knife to gun fight.

    • DenverKitty

      You just earned “Comment of the Day!” Gratz!!

    • PatRiot

      Cannon were common to the militiamen & any others of the era who could afford them

    • Arthur Mackey

      You my compatriot are one who has a grasp of the true meaning of owning guns besides it being a Right and my own choice ! The intent, specifically written out by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson show their wisdom and foresight into what could and is currently happening under the guise of Democracy by BHO who as far as anyone can REALLY PROVE ISN’T EVEN A LEGAL CITIZEN OF THIS COUNTRY ! IT’S TIME FOR CONGRESS TO USE SOME INTESTINAL FORTITUDE, PLUS A BIT OF HONESTY ABOUT BHO, and demand from Obama’s Camp and the Democratic Party that he give “We the People” all of his sealed records to Vet him finally and fully, hold NOTHING thing back including why Michelle Obama GAVE UP HER LICENSE OR HAD IT TAKEN AWAY AND which is part of our National Security ! ANOTHER QUOTE THAT MAY BE COMING TO FRUITION IS THAT ” The Tree of Liberty Needs to be Watered with the Blood of Patriots and Tyrants Alike every so often” ! We are a Republic as stated by our Founding Fathers and the other leaders who followed them ! It is time to go backILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO CONTROL PEOPLE to simplicity and The rule of law plus Our Constitution for Governance rather than through the deep pockets of PACS and Lobbyists, forbidding them access to any of the Legislative process or Legislators ! These people, the PACS and the Lobbyists even including Michael Bloomberg, whom i consider a Treasonous Fool, AND HIS MEDIA EMPIRE AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO CONTROL PEOPLE and issues !

  • Graywolf12

    Having no knowledge on a subject never inpedes a liberal from acting like they know all there is about a subject. We ignorant non-progressives just do not understand how smart they are on all subjects.

    • kay

      Yes. One of the biggest progs thinks you can shoot down an airplane with a rifle. They are idiotic to the extreme.

      • Phillip_in_TX

        You can shoot down an airplane with a rifle. It may not be easy; however, it can be done. Plus, without a pilot, most aircraft cannot fly by themselves.

      • Arizona_Don

        Hey don’t bring up that subject, you know how they copy. I am a retired pilot and as a civilian here in the states I was shot at three times and hit once. Can’t punch out ya know!

    • Arizona_Don

      Well said and correct!

  • http://www.facebook.com/james.ellistonl James T. Ellistonl

    Lefties can give weapons to the drug cartels in Mexico, but don’t want us to own the same. Getting really tired of all the bull coming from the left. Stand united is the only way we will beat these weirdo’s.

    • Paul

      You do understand how important those drugs are to a certain class of “people” don’t you? Their drug addled minds must constantly be kept sedated, or they go crazy and do illegal things.

      • a_browning

        I have the “antidote” right here for what ailes the thug.

    • Trixie

      I always have to read twice anything about “lefties” because I’m left handed. I use libs or leftists! Just saying. You can change or not. I’m not offended. I would never impose or try to impose any PC garbage on anyone. Have a great day.

      • panors77

        PC=Politically communist.

      • greyghost69

        How ’bout “Demwits?”

    • JT

      Az’s lack of gun laws are giving weapons to the drug cartels.

      • ArmedPatriot

        oh bull crap.

        Every gun store has to do a background check.
        AZ is no easier to get a gun than most states in the union.
        Get a clue

  • Sarge 52

    The Government is not doing their JOB, you know stay the hell out of our business
    enough already, I’m gonna get me a Tank because it’s almost impossible to get ammo,
    for a rifle or handgun park the Tank out in front of the house and scare the hell out of the intruder ??

  • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    When they come for our guns, I think we should station several cauldrons of boiling oil on the roofs of our houses, and shoot them with cross-bows.

  • regulus30

    the cultural war;;;;;;;hearty patriot country/wildlife oriented Americans**** wimpy a666ed, feminazi, socialist urbane, city slickers………the society is out of balance;; too many asphalt monkeys.

  • Darrell Lynch

    I agree 100%. Personally, I wouldn’t waste the money on any weapon that uses that pee-wee .225 round. BIG waste of money! I’ll check out the LaRue. I love .308!

    • Texas Patriot

      Some of us have arthritis and other physical conditions that do not stand up well to the recoil of the .308. But, when I take my Ruger Ranch Rifle, which is .223 not .225 as you said, and can drop 30 rounds offhand into a five inch group at 75 yards in about 20 seconds, I find that sufficient for my needs. Try doing that with your .308.

      • PatRiot

        Mini 14’s are chambered for .223 & 5.56,except the target model.Also the DSA model SA58 & the PTR-91 KF,.308/7.62 NATO,are AR type rifles & more accurate at 100 yards than a Mini at 75

    • Onesix

      Darrell, It’s a 223 round. But you can get an AR in several different calibers including the 6.8mm SPC developed buy our Special Opps folks. It’s a 270 lite and is perfect for most if not all North american game.

      • Arizona_Don

        All the Ruger mini’s are good both the 14’s and 30’s. No I don’t have stock in Ruger.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/5P73LT3ABJXXILIHMH6SK6B7OM Wild Thing

      Pee wee .225 round? Who make that? I thought it was .223 round. Are you another troll?


    The liberal agenda is counting on Americas ignorance to remove all guns in America. President Obama’s move is the logical step in complete control of the USA. Hitler realized this and rounded up the guns. He had it easier for the people had no rights protecting them. When people want to live in peace they will do most anything to get it. Especially if they think they or their children are in danger. This is why the media repeats the tragedies over and over actually hoping the people see it on their doorstep. Congress can now pass laws with the backing or perceived backing of the people. With the help of the press exaggerating the support of those for gun control and repressing the ones against it they give a false vision of events to sway the opinions of the rest. Gun control? A simple 2300 page document will do that we will need to pass to see what is in it. The problem comes with the 30,000 pages of regulations that will come with it. Like the bite of an Asp, once the poison is in you it causes a slow and painful death. Wake up people our Nation is about to be bitten.
    God bless America.

    • Arizona_Don

      Hitler had an easy go of it because the guns were already registered. There is a lesson here also if we wish to learn it. That lesson is avoid registration at all costs if at all possible. Even though the administration when the guns are being registered may not have that end in mind the next one may and that is how confiscation begins. However, hitler was not the only person in Europe during the 20th century to confiscate the guns, there were many others, all with the same goal complete control of the people. Over 170 million were murdered by their government. It just so happens however, you or I can never point that out to a liberal progressive, they won’t listen to reason. It is true it seems those who do not learn history are bound to repeat it. There sure are some ignorant people in this world.

  • Encycloman

    The Lonny Left Liberals are posting Facebook ads for their stupid programs.

    Looks like they are trying for all they are worth. Maybe we should do the same?

  • 67chevyrules

    To all and everybody,

    It’s not within
    my powers to stop the very judgment of God but He has blessed me with a somewhat
    gifted understanding! Not one of you has
    even considered just why all this is coming upon them yet it was spoken about
    eons ago before this time and even gave the reasons why. I have been constantly writing and offering
    one the solution for God had wished everyone to follow His decisions rather than
    mankind towards taking it upon themselves to change everything! I would add these decisions sometimes seemed
    harsh or a little unorthodox or threatening but the overall picture is the very
    fact these were all encompassing rules of guidance which considered God and His
    kingdom first and then the safety and preservation of mankind as a whole
    regarding how to even live upon God’s planet!
    One has not considered the strange fire which Nadab and Abihu offered in
    a previous time and neither also exactly what this was nor the given
    consequences which transpired yet are they not spoken about!

    Furthermore Covenant
    agreements were made and then broken!
    These were even tied in oaths as well as the blood of mankind first and
    foremost! If one is to say all these
    were done away with I verily tell one differently and even because of these
    reasons as well! When mankind had been
    given the Precepts, Judgments and Statutes and written by Moses first and
    foremost, they even specified where they came from with directional pinpoint specificity! One had been told these guidance directions
    were too hard to follow or to give unto one his due or many other slightly
    changed directions but I tell one differently even as it is written: not to follow
    any others ways and not to walk in the statutes of your fathers nor serve their
    judgments nor to defile yourselves with their idols and yet this is exactly what
    has transformed today! Some
    transfiguration huh?

    What has grown
    into fruition then? Today none are held accountable for their words and the rules
    of governance have been twisted so badly to favor one of many other criteria,
    person, or one benefit or another that one doesn’t even know whether they are
    coming or going anymore! It also has
    allowed what never should have grown into any formidable force to now stand
    before Gods very instructions for mankind in protest against these very
    instructions! Even the rules regarding
    land ownership are flawed because one doesn’t follow these guidelines!

    Now one seeks to
    take materialistic criteria in punishment, or to place the blame on drugs or
    whatnot or to stand upon other principles left by ones fathers but these are
    not the correct answers nor ever will be! The very house itself is built upon sand rather
    than a solid rock and the very first tsunami is and will wash it all away
    swiftly and expediently! Yes you have
    sewn the wind and shall reap the whirlwind of bygone Egypt before this is all
    over and after this tumult against tumult!
    And why? Because one would not
    listen to God’s Spoken Word first and foremost!
    All one has to do is look for themselves and they will find these very
    words do speak out in given prior instructions.
    For instance in Ezekiel 20:18 and onward there is a verily specificity beyond
    just argument or reproach and enumeration doth justify itself! I might add even
    this whole section is a very good segment of instructions in its entirety!

    I have also
    previously mentioned to wit: there are principalities and powers totally beyond
    ones control regarding this who situation.
    God wanted this land to be a kingdom of priests and whatnot and to
    justly deal with the worldly problems as a whole but this isn’t what prevails
    today and one can guess why! Yes this
    was to be a set example of a house ruled by the very God of our forefathers benefiting
    everyone but this isn’t the case today for one has been subverted by broken
    covenants and purported new covenants.
    Even to return to Egypt for more horses and men rather than to stay up God’s
    Spoken Words of instructions! Now doth
    the house of Egypt rule again in its entirety!
    Look towards these other countries and see their anger towards you for
    they have allowed you to proceed and then everything was reneged upon and by
    guess who? Even the beginnings or rather
    very roots of this Kingdom was taken from the rightful owner through subversive
    wealth and eloquent words! And what more
    is it one may say to change another’s mind except: Stiff necked mentalities
    doth prevail once again!

    • knowitall

      Not one of us has considered it ?? A lot of us know whats going on 67chevy. Those who chose to take God out of everything is the root of the problem,but God doesn’t tell us to sit with our hands in our back pockets either. Put God back where he belongs here and then Lock and load to get the message across to those who think different. God Bless!

  • Phillip_in_TX

    We don’t need “Beer?” Who would have thought? ; )

    We can make a deal with the anti-gunners.

    If you don’t want to own a gun, then don’t. We will not tell you what guns “not to own.”

    We want to own guns. So, don’t tell us what guns to own (or what size a magazines we can have, or what accessories we can have, etc).

    In short, you mind your own business, and we will mind our own business.

    • Graywolf12

      Said like a true Texan. Check out the book “Texas got it right” by Sam & Andrew Wyly. “If it’s true it ain’t bragging” To bad too many do not know the truth about our great state.

      • TexasOlTimer

        Yup! If more knew the history of our great state, they’d be a little less inclined to tell us what to do, how to do it, or what with! The signs along the road that say “Don’t Mess with Texas” say it all! Most of our ancestors here fought for Texas Independence back in 1836 and we’ll stand ready to do it again. Like they said at Gonzales “Come and take it!” with the same result!

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/5P73LT3ABJXXILIHMH6SK6B7OM Wild Thing

          The “don’t mess with Texas” signs meant not to litter, and most of us native Texans are not descended from those who fought for Independence. You are funny.

          • TexasOlTimer

            Good grief! Don’t you think I know what the signs are put there for? Of course it’s to tell people not to litter. Have you no sense of humor? In today’s world it have a definite double meaning.

            As to all native Texans – no, a lot are children of transplants and unfortunately bring their foreign ways with them. However, there are many thousands that belong to either the Sons of the Republic of Texas or the Daughters of the Republic of Texas and many thousands more that are eligible but haven’t joined for whatever reason. We know the history of our state and it’s taught in both the 4th and 7th grades so that others know it growing up.

          • PatRiot

            I lived in Wichita Falls while stationed at FT Sill in 1965,they had better beer than Ok & the car hops brought your beer in long necks

    • Arizona_Don

      That’s the problem with these A-H liberal progressives. If a conservative doesn’t like something they don’t buy it. If a liberal progressive doesn’t like something they don’t want anyone to have it. So they advocate banning it.

  • ReaperHD

    The problem is the boy in the WH thinks he is going to still fundamentally change this country. When he takes the oath of office today he should be arrested for treason along with the bozo biden and executed for not upholding his oath of office the last four years.

  • lldav67

    One problem is that most libs have probably never had their hands on an AR-15. If they’d ever shot one they would know how “fun” it is. Just call it fear of the unknown… (p.s. and I’m a girl…)

    • Phillip_in_TX

      That is why I suggested they should teach “gun safety & marksmanship” in schools. As well as do away with “Gun Free Zones.”

  • jeepdude911

    The last I heard, this is America. We don’t “need” a car that’ll do 175mph, but they’re cool, and if I want one, I just WORK for the income, and go get it. Same goes for a BBQ that’ll do a whole hog, or an AR-!5. we don’t have to need it, we should be able to have it because we want it and are willing ( some of us anyway) to work for it.

    • Phillip_in_TX

      Amen to that!

    • Arizona_Don

      Sure am glad you added some of us!!!

  • Bob

    “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” Thomas Jefferson

  • knowitall

    Bottom line is : Who are they to tell me what I can own ?? I am an American Vet. and served to protect our constitution from the likes of obutthead and his cronies ,and I won’t ever let any of those idiot commies tell me to give up or which gun I can own or use ! God bless.

    • TexasOlTimer

      If there are people in this country that don’t want to own guns, so be it. Just require that they put a sign on their front lawn or in their business window “Gun Free Zone.”

      • Phillip_in_TX

        Project Veritas tried that. They went around with signs and tried to give them away. They went to the newspapers employees and other “anti gun” people trying to give away the signs.

        To watch the full video, visit http://www.ProjectVeritas.com

        • TexasOlTimer

          Isn’t it ironic? They don’t want guns and they don’t want anyone else to have them. Although if they outlaw them, then the signs won’t be needed because the criminals will know that no one has guns. So they will be as safe then as they would be now if they put a sign in their yard. But they don’t want to do that because then the criminals will know they don’t have a way of protecting themselves. Their logic is so illogical as to be nothing more than nonsense “feel good” words.

    • SirWilhelm

      The criminals may not realize that the 2nd Amendment says the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed, but, their carrying, and using guns, is also their right. “people” does not distinguish between law abiding, or criminal. Like it or not, laws against criminals owning guns, infringe on their right to bear arms. The good news, is that any law that infringes on anyone, violates this amendment, despite what the Supreme Court has ruled. I guess the SC isn’t perfect, is it? Especially since they assumed the right of review, which wasn’t given them by the Constitution:

      Maybe it’s time to restore the Constitution, and start from scratch?

      • Arthur mackey

        We have never changed any of the Constitution to weaken it, Legislators and all politicians have been trying to bypass it but the basics are there ! It is past time to Use the Rule of Law, The Constitution with its original meanings and the Bill of Rights to run this country ! Outlaw PACS and Lobbyists and make it illegal to do either through the use of the Constitutional Law !

    • Arthur Mackey

      To those who don’t understand you here is a little bit of information. “The taste of freedom has a flavor that the Protected will never know ” !

  • Buttons

    I know a friend of mine who hunts deer with a AR15 in223 caliber.Now I am a bolt fan myself but anyone who wants to own an AR15 should be able to.The 2and ammendment does not limit what kind of weapon can be owned by law abiding people.Besides law abiding people do not commit crime,it’s the criminal.But I think they know this.They only want to totally disarm the people of this country so they can controll the people of this country.It’s going to be The United Sociaists States Of America if we don’t wake up soon and do something about this!!!!!!!!!!!!! One last point.If the Liberals really want to save livesThey should do more to limit drunk driving Since over 10,000 people are killed every year by drunk drivers.And some of them are children.Maybe ban cars huh!!!!!!

    • Arizona_Don

      A 223 is a little light for Deer. Even a 243 is marginal.

      • SirWilhelm

        The deer I shot right between the eyes with my .243, didn’t think it was marginal, at least, they didn’t mention it, when I was cleaning them.

        • Arizona_Don

          I don’t think you could have managed that at over a hundred yards running. No matter what you say a 223 is light and a 243 is marginal. You must live in the East where long shots are not common.

          • SirWilhelm

            A good hunter doesn’t let them know he’s there, and doesn’t have to shoot them on the run. I agree a .223 is too light for deer. Yes, I live in the East, and a hundred yards was probably the average for my shots. I hunted chucks for practice, and was able to get them at longer ranges, but, head shots on deer, saved a lot of meat.

          • Arizona_Don

            Good luck!

          • SirWilhelm

            Sadly, my hunting days are long over. I have a bad heart, and it’s too risky. But, good luck to you!

      • Billy Hill

        I kill deer with a single shot,bolt action .22,one shot,well placed just behind the front shoulder

        • Arizona_Don

          I don’t think I said it was impossible, I said a 223 was a little light for deer and a 243 was marginal. I too once got a deer with a 22 single shot, however, it is not recommended to hunt deer with anything that small. I have also put down a 1500 lb bull with a 22 single shot when we butchered but that is a different story completely. The reason is you stand the chance of wounding much more than putting the deer down and it staying down.

          Many years ago the most popular rifle for deer was the 30/30 iron sights especially back east. Out here because of the much longer shots and much bigger mule deer most use at least a 270, but preferred is the 30/06 because of the variables in reloading.

  • Debbie

    Shot for the first time an AR-15 this weekend. Also shot my new 12 gauge shotgun and my new handgun. Had a blast. I am going for my CCL in a couple of weeks. I am a 62 year old woman. Come on down to Texas and try to infringe on my rights! I dare you!

    • Phillip_in_TX

      Good for you! I got my wife her CHL awhile back. She had a good time and even out shot some of the people I work with.

      Don’t Mess With Texas!

      • Arizona_Don

        Arizona either, we don’t need a CCL.

        • Phillip_in_TX

          We are working to get “open carry” here. You can carry a weapon in your vehicle without having to have a CHL.

          Plus, I would love to see all the “Gun Free Zones” (better known as “Come Kill Us Here Zones”) eliminated.

          I love Archie Bunkers idea http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o57hOxXHFc

    • defendconstitution

      Good going Debbie. If you need any help, just call me and I’ll be there with all my ‘toys’ and plenty of ammo for each. I have had my ccp and just joined the NRA after being a gun owner for 60 years.

  • libsuk

    Tell ya what you give it to them and I will beat it out of them.

  • JohnM

    The Libs didn’t raise a stink about the four Border Patrol Agents and the hundreds of innocent people in Mexico who were killed as a resut of the Marxist Monarch’s baby Operation Fast & and Furious. However, it won’t be long before they scream at the top of their lungs if any crimminal lowlife such as burglars or home invaders (Part of their voter base) is dispatched by a frightened mom with a 357 Magnum who’s home home alone with her little kids after these thugs break into her home.

  • Bubba

    I find it irritating when anyone tells me what I “need”, especially prissy liberals.

  • Tells it like it is

    The 5 Worst/Recent Mass Murders in the USA (with a Firearm) Came from Democrats

    The source of information for this news post came from Roger Hedgecock’s 1/17/13 radio show. Here’s the link. Fast forward to 21:13 for Roger’s comments.
    The five worst mass killings, where a firearm was used, have a common thread. Hint #1: They didn’t belong to the NRA. They don’t fit the stereotype of the “red-neck” gun owner.
    Check it out …
    Ft Hood: Registered Democrat/Muslim.
    Columbine: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.
    Virginia Tech: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff.
    Colorado Theater: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.
    Connecticut School Shooter: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.
    Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.
    Also, of the worst killings in the last several decades, only one was a female, all the rest were boys, barely men. Their role models were rappers, action movies, comics and violent video games.
    Our problem isn’t weapons, it’s boys without boundaries. Who live in ‘progressive’ households.

    Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/the-5-worst-mass-murders-in-the-usa-with-a-firearm-came-from-democrats/#ixzz2IcUj9xFp
    Get more Clash on ClashDaily.com, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

  • BrassRing

    The trouble with liberals is they are stunningly stupid. Add to that the sissy factor, wanting mommy to take care of them, and you end up with the dysfunctional blue states and cities.

    • SirWilhelm

      Don’t underestimate liberals, they have ways of getting what they want. Underhanded, sneaky, corrupt ways. that got them an illegal alien, foreign national in the White House, to complete their agenda to transform America into their idea of a liberal utopia. And their idea of mommy, the nanny state, is all too happy to take care of them, in exchange for all our freedoms. Soon, in around four years, they’ll have the one, big, blue state of America, they have always wanted.

  • http://www.vatican.va/ Rulz

    Don’t like guns, then don’t get one!

  • sagebrush6

    Why is it the progressive liberals that steal guns then go and kill movie goers and children in school have never been a conservative NRA member?

    Ft Hood Shooter – Registered Democrat- Muslim
    Columbine Shooters – Too young to vote- both families were registered democrats and progressive liberals – as with the twit that shot Congress woman Giffords, and 2 or 3 others.
    Virginia Tech Shooter- Wrote hate mail to Pres Bush and to his staff. Registered Democrat
    Colorado Theater Shooter – Registered Democrat, staff worker on the Obama campaign, occupy wall street participant – progressive liberal
    Connecticut School Shooter- Registered Democrat, hated christians,

    Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal democrats.” Interesting…isn’t it?

    Maybe it should be illegal for them to buy guns? Where’s the media on this information ?

  • Mys77

    Seems like the government is wanting to disarm people from having any power… any power to have a voice, to make our choices, to choose how we live, and most importantly they want to control so we don’t fight back. They want to say we can have weapons just as long as those weapons don’t equal or surpass their own arsenal. I get it… the people can have BB guns, and the government can have the semi automatic weapons…. yeah that seems about how the government works it!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7JJCQ6HFMLEJ4UVJNCERSDH36Q Bernardo

    A gun is a tool and thus the LaRue rifle is one. The deer was no doubt taken with one shot as the .308 has similar ballistics of the venerable ol’ .30-06. The remaining rounds unused in the clip are good terrorist medicine against Obama’s confiscatory thugs.
    The LaRue is a tool, it got meat for the pot and is suitable for self protection. Libs like Feinstein think such a rifle has to empty the full clip while in use, so dumb! BANG! One hit from a .308 whether a semi auto black rifle or a bolt action rifle and you’re dead! Ammo’s getting expensive,no sense using any more than you have to.Shot placement is paramount to anything else except firearm safety,you should always live by the rules of safety when using a firearm.

  • JayKay4

    And another thing, the second amendment has absolutely nothing to do with “needs.” It is a RIGHT! Read it and weep, you left wing, pinko, grass-sniffing, tree hugging, anti-work, anti-constitution, so-called progressives and liberals.

  • BigUgly666

    Y’all should look into George Rex III opinion of the rifled flintlock of 1775. He said that it was “unconscionable” for the “Colonials” to be killing His Majesty’s soldiers with such a “deadly, long-range, killing machine” …… It was Death to shoot at His Majesty” soldiers with a “rifled barrel” weapon …. after all, “truly civilized” soldiers stood in massed ranks firing at their opponents until so many men had fallen that the troops broke ranks and ran. Do any of you realize that during massed fire – one and one-half to two tons of lead crossed the field each and every minute? The “smooth-bore” was more than capable of hitting a man-sized target, regularly, at 150 to 200 yards – the “rifled bore” was more than capable of hitting a man sized target at 500-600 yards.

    It’s not much different today – what with “civilians” being much better armed than is the military …. it’s that way for a reason …. so WE THE PEOPLE can undo an oppressive, over-bearing, unlawful, and tyrannical government and to put the country back under our LAWFUL CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENT.

  • Tom Parker

    Keep up the pressure. The wanna-be tyrants are feeling it!

  • Tejanojack

    Nice buck and nice shootin’ arn!

  • WhiteFalcon

    Personally, I don’t need an opinion from any commieonazicratsw. They don’t think well enough to have opinions.

  • Herbert

    President Obama during a thnly veiled reference to the 2nd Amendment during his inaurguration speech, announced that the United States has no need for militias and by necessary reference, no further need for the 2nd Amendment.

    • BD Katt

      The 2nd is not about militias

  • Tank

    Buh buh buh buuuuhhhhttt, it just looks SOOO scary!!! I think Kim Kardashian’s rhino sized ass is scary too, but the media doesn’t have any issue throwing that thing up on my screen at every given opportunity… I mean, who needs a high capacity ass that large?? Really!

  • J. Larson

    God bless you Brian Sikes and thank you for your service!

  • danclamage

    Went to two gun shops today. Both out of AR-15’s and similar weapons. Plenty of Remington 770’s though.

  • doug schexnayder

    Utopian socialism IS NOT progressive in any way!
    We should cease NOW and use the accurate term…socialist left or utopian socialists…why play into their hands?
    Do they refer to us as we wish? NO.
    The dim voters keep hearing the wrong words and think they really are progressive …Castro is progressive too. STOP using that word or continue being the pantywaist suckas the elite Repubs are these days (I mean decade)…

  • Buck

    I look forward to the day when progressives are classified as ” BIG GAME ” ! ( joke ) .

    • Tan Orangu

      Never happen,they would be classed as varmints

  • rex

    I am not a liberal but still think anyone that hunts with a semi is a sissy.

    • Billy Hill

      Yeah,we jump on their backs & choke them

  • panors77

    Hey??? Take beer off the un-needed list!! LOL. I sure as hell could add other “un-needed” items too like smartphones, Kindles, IPADs, IPAD notebooks,texting, etc. Also “un-needed TV like CNN, MSNBC, Rachell Maddow, Kieth Olberman, Pierce Morgan(is he still here?) SNL, Colbert, Wanda Sikes,Joy Behar, Bill Maher, etc. The list is vast of un-needed stuff,heh.

  • $9913635

    Anyone who mentions “gun control” is tricking you into handing over your weapons so they can have no problem CONTROLLING YOU.

    Yeah, it’s all about wicked people FORCING you to do things THEIR WAY.

    Never hand over your weapons.

    True Indian Story:

    About 150 years ago Mexicans traveling through Indian country with
    their families when Indians showed up. The Indians fearing the armed
    Mexicans made a deal with them. They approached peacefully and unarmed and
    told them if they gave their weapons to them (rifles, pistols, etc.)
    they would leave them alone and they could go on their merry way.

    The Mexicans believed the Indians and handed over their weapons.
    Shortly after, the Indians tied the Mexican men upside down on their
    wagon wheels and burnt them alive, ravaged and scalped the women,
    slaughtered the children and ate the food the Mexicans had with them.

  • rangers53

    Doug. I love you, man!

  • BD Katt

    I think there should be a beer amendment in the Constitution,Ben Franklin said”Beer is proof God loves us”

  • waterman

    AMEN!!!! BROTHER, I like the way you talk……….in fact I’d like to see one of those little cowards in my sight someday………..maybe a RR AR or a Barrett 50 cal for a reach out and touch’em kind of shot………that would scare the pants off any political coward or his breathern the everyday criminal.

  • Aaron Freeman

    Hey, I have a hot Italian wife… So, Ms. Leftist, I’m not available to be your man! I’m too much of a “real man” for you anyway! I’m not some metrosexual guy that thinks it’s important to primp and preen before doing anything! I’m good looking enough without that, and my hot and sexy Italian wife likes me just like that!!!

  • Tom T

    I used to think that having to utilize the second amendment was a matter of “IF” but it seems to me and many others in my area that it is now a matter of “WHEN”.

  • Wayne Langley

    Your posting policy is enough to make one puke. I’m being as polite as possible, thank you. I haven’t read one reasonable article, or comment yet.

  • http://www.facebook.com/arthur.mackey Arthur Mackey

    Most liberals don’t know the difference ion an M4A1 and an AR 15 and neve3r will so they need serious education !

    • fraccle

      “With high-speed magazines”

  • gw of utah

    The 2nt Amendment allowed for the most modern military weapon of the time. If I follow true progressive logic I should be able to purchase any E.B.R. (evil black rifle) my little hart desires. The good progressives of the Senate couldn’t give a flip about hunting or paper shooting or the pleasure or pride of teaching your children or grandchildren the skill of marksmanship.

    Our Swiss friends are not pestered by their neighbors because there if a modern rifle or two or three in every home with people that use them well.
    Liberals if you prefer Progressives, are people to paraphrase Mr. Winston Churchill people who stumble over the truth get up dust them selves off and keep right on going.

The latest from ClashDaily.com