• Erica

    Interesting.

  • chuck146

    WATCHED FROM START TO FINISH THAT DAY, SAW CLOSE UP VIEW OF BUSHMSTER IN TRUNK OF CAR WITH ANOTHER, A SHOTGUN. POLICE STATED HE WAS FOUND WITH TWO HANDGUNS, TIL FEDS GOT THERE, THEN ALL STORIES CHANGED. WHAT ABOUT THE THREE MEN THAT WERE RACING AWAY FROM SCHOOL? WHY WAS THE ONE IN THE WOODS CARRYING GUNS, AND WHEN WAS CAUGHT, SAID HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT DOWN THERE? HOW IS THAT THE SO CALLED SHOOTER HAD BROTHERS ID ON HIM, WHEN HE HAD NOT SEEN HIS BROTHER FOR YEARS PRIOR TO SHOOTING.? THE WITNESS SAID SHE SAW SHADOWS OF THREE MEN GO BY THE DOOR? THEY SAID LANZA’S MOTHER TAUGHT AT SCHOOL, BUT THEY SAY SHE NEVER WORKED THERE? THE STORY SHE TOOK HIM TO RANGE PRIOR TO SHOOTING WAS DEBUNKED AFTERWARDS? THIS SCHOOL NURSE NAME COX, ONE SHOWS SHE DIDN’T HAVE ANY RELIABLE ID OR EVEN ANY BACKGROUND THEY COULD FIND? WHY WOULD THE MAN THEY CAUGHT IN WOODS BE PUT IN FRONT OF POLICE CAR? WHY DIDN’T THE CORONER WANT TO SAY THE CALIBER OF THE LONG GUN USED WHEN ASKED? HE SAID HE WAS AN EXPERT ON WEAPONS, BUT WOULD LET THE POLICE TELL REPORTERS? 700 KIDS IN THAT SCHOOL, NEVER SAW ANY LEAVING AND THEY WERE THERE ALL DAY FILMING THIS?

    • PhillyPhoto

      “WATCHED FROM START TO FINISH THAT DAY”

      So you saw the shooter(s) go in to the school? I assume you were the one that called the police since you saw it from the beginning?

      • http://www.facebook.com/robert.andersonsr Robert Anderson Sr

        STUPID-He states WATCH the CLIP from Start to finish _ DID HE STATE he was there ? Get a life and stop trying to cover for your DADDY !!

        • PhillyPhoto

          You need to work on your reading comprehension. He does NOT say anything about “watch the clip from start to finish”, he clearly said “WATCHED FROM START TO FINISH THAT DAY” meaning December 14th, 2012 @ approx 9:35 am. The first image wasn’t put out until 11:10 am, plenty of time to evacuate. [http://wtvr.com/2012/12/14/timeline-of-connecticut-elementary-school-shooting/]

          Who is my daddy supposed to be that I’m ‘covering for’, by the way?

          • Lumpy Rutherford

            You don’t know, either?

          • seektruth

            Most people here get the point of what was meant but you want to be contentious for whatever reason.
            This story has changed many times and it’s made out to be some “complicated investigation”. It has become complicated because the story has changed MANY times and there are many inconsistencies. It is not difficult to identify guns and bullet holes especially comparing a .223 round vs. a 9 or 10 mm. The reports as generated that day made a few changes from the initial, but not just on guns: The Lanza family story changed many times. The neighbor’s story of the children in his yard. The car driven by Lanza. No follow-up on the other captured people (at least none that make sense). The MULTIPLE website postings prior to the event including the Parker family postings on their facebook page that day. An early morning post saying they lost their daughter and then later saying they weren’t sure yet because the names had not been released.
            Basically it comes down to this: they lost containment of this story and it’s blowing up.

          • RacerJim

            “they [the Feds] lost containment of this story and it’s blowing up”. Same as Fast & Furious and Benghazi, but in those cases the Feds are not holding anyone responsible like they are the NRA re Sandy Hook.

          • Dan Stewart

            Stick your head back up obamas ass & shut up.

    • QuisPercusit

      All evidence to what you saw was digitalized into a sponge Bob Square Pants Cartoon. Yyou did not see what you thought you saw, you saw a distorted picture caused by your hysteria and shock that the Media was hawking for their own benefit.

      • Lumpy Rutherford

        That hysteria, always rearing it’s ugly head…

    • madmemere

      We were told the kids were taken out through the “back door to the firehouse” and a 6 yr-old did testify, on video “When we ran out the back door, I saw a man laying on the ground”! A 6 yr-old has no reason to lie and we had already heard the police radio sound byte “I got one proned out”! Unfortunately local law enforcement and the medical examiner did not respond well, in their news interviews.

    • oldgringo

      Lets face it….The News Media is the enemy of the people….They make up stories with just a smidgon of information….But it sells….That is the goal of the news media…they don’t care if the story is true or not….They are concerned strictly with profit no matter how it is made…..They have become tabloids of distortions and untruths….Remembering the Bin Laden story and our navy seals….Everyday the story changed with the last one supposedly being the factual one….This went on for over a week…..And now there’s a movie out that supposedly tells the whole truth and nothing but the truth….I don’t suppose Hollywood has profit motives in mind either!

  • singingcowboy674

    Doug, I think a couple of important pieces of information or evidence was glanced over that I found in a forwarded email that is not simply outrageous, unwarranted or baseless. Here’s the excerpt.

    The Accidental Medical Examiner

    An especially important yet
    greatly underreported feature of the Sandy Hook affair is the wholly
    bizarre performance of Connecticut’s top medical examiner H.
    Wayne Carver II at a December 15 press conference. Carver’s
    unusual remarks and behavior warrant close consideration because in
    light of his professional notoriety they appear remarkably amateurish
    and out of character.

    H. Wayne Carver II has an extremely
    self-assured, almost swaggering presence in Connecticut state
    administration. In early 2012 Carver threatened to vacate his position
    because of state budget cuts and streamlining measures that threatened
    his professional autonomy over the projects and personnel he oversaw.

    Along
    these lines the pathologist has gone to excessive lengths to
    demonstrate his findings and expert opinion in court proceedings. For
    example, in a famous criminal case Carver “put a euthanized pig
    through a wood chipper so jurors could match striations on the bone
    fragments with the few ounces of evidence that prosecutors said were on
    the remains of the victim.”[4] One would therefore expect
    Carver to be in his element while identifying and verifying the exact
    ways in which Sandy Hook’s children and teachers met their
    violent demise.

    Yet the H. Wayne Carver who showed up to the
    December 15 press conference is an almost entirely different man,
    appearing apprehensive and uncertain, as if he is at a significant
    remove from the postmortem operation he had overseen. The multiple
    gaffes, discrepancies, and hedges in response to reporters’
    astute questions suggest that he is either under coercion or an
    imposter. While the latter sounds untenable it would go a long way in
    explaining his sub-pedestrian grasp of medical procedures and
    terminology.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE0OT5od9DA

    With
    this in mind extended excerpts from this exchange are worthy of
    recounting here in print. Carver is accompanied by Connecticut State
    Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance and additional Connecticut State Police
    personnel. The reporters are off-screen and thus unidentified so I have
    assigned them simple numerical identification based on what can be
    discerned of their voices.

    Reporter #1: So the rifle was the primary weapon?

    H. Wayne Carver: Yes.

    Reporter #1: [Inaudible]

    Carver: Uh (pause). Question was what caliber were these bullets.
    And I know—I probably know more about firearms than most
    pathologists but if I say it in court they yell at me and don’t
    make me answer [sic]—so [nervous laughter]. I’ll let
    the police do that for you.

    Reporter #2: Doctor can you tell
    us about the nature of the wounds. Were they at very close range? Were
    the children shot at from across the room?

    Carver: Uhm, I
    only did seven of the autopsies. The victims I had ranged from three to
    eleven wounds apiece and I only saw two of them with close range
    shooting. Uh, but that’s, uh y’know, a sample. Uh, I
    really don’t have detailed information on the rest of the
    injuries.

    [Given that Carver is Connecticut’s top
    coroner and in charge of the entire postmortem this is a startling
    admission.-JT]

    Reporter #3: But you said that the long rifle was used?

    Carver: Yes.

    Reporter #3: But the long rifle was discovered in the car.

    State Police Lieutenant Vance: That’s not correct, sir.

    Unidentified reporter #4: How many bullets or bullet fragments did you find in the autopsy. Can you tell us that?

    Carver: Oh. I’m lucky I can tell you how many I found. I
    don’t know. There were lots of them, OK? This type of weapon is
    not, uh … the bullets are designed in such a fashion that the
    energy—this is very clinical. I shouldn’t be saying
    this. But the energy is deposited in the tissue so the bullet stays in
    [the tissue].

    [In fact, the Bushmaster .223 Connecticut
    police finally claimed was used in the shooting is designed for long
    range field use and utilizes high velocity bullets averaging 3,000
    feet-per-second, the energy of which even at considerable distance would
    penetrate several bodies before finally coming to rest in tissue.]

    Reporter #5: How close were the injuries?

    Carver: Uh, all the ones (pause). I believe say, yes [sic].

    Reporter #6: In what shape were the bodies when the families were brought to check [inaudible].

    Carver: Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into
    contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We
    have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do
    that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal
    in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be
    best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a
    situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good
    photographers. Uh, but uh—

    Reporter #7: Do you know
    the difference of the time of death between the mother in the house and
    the bodies recovered [in the school].

    Carver: Uh, no, I don’t. Sorry [shakes head excitedly] I don’t! [embarrassed laugh]

    Reporter #8: Did the gunman kill himself with the rifle?

    Carver: No. I—I don’t know yet.
    I’ll-I’ll examine him tomorrow morning. But, but I
    don’t think so.

    [Why has Carver left arguably the
    most important specimen for last? And why doesn't he think Lanza didn't
    commit suicide with the rifle?]

    Reporter #9: In terms of the children, were they all found in one classroom or—

    Carver: Uhm … [inaudible] [Turns to Lieutenant Vance] Paul and company will deal with that.

    Reporter #9: What?

    Carver: Paul and company will deal with that. Lieutenant Vance is going to handle that one.

    Reporter #10: Was there any evidence of a struggle? Any bruises?

    Carver: No.

    Reporter #11: The nature of the shooting; is there any sense that
    there was a lot of care taken with precision [inaudible] or randomly?

    Carver: [Exhales while glancing upward, as if frustrated] Both.
    It’s a very difficult question to answer … You’d
    think after thousands of people I’ve seen shot but I …
    It’s … If I attempted to answer it in court there’d
    be an objection and then they’d win—[nervous
    laughter].

    [Who would win? Why does an expert whose routine
    job as a public employee is to provide impartial medical opinion
    concerned with winning and losing in court? Further, Carver is not in
    court but rather at a press conference.]

    Reporter #12: Doctor, can you discuss the fatal injuries to the adults?

    Carver: Ah, they were similar to those of the children.

    Reporter #13: Doctor, the children you had autopsied, where in the bodies were they hit?

    Carver: Uhm [pause]. All over. All over.

    Reporter #14: Were [the students] sitting at their desks or were they running away when this happened?

    Carver: I’ll let the guys who—the scene guys
    talk—address that issue. I, uh, obviously I was at the scene.
    Obviously I’m very experienced in that. But there are people
    who are, uh, the number one professionals in that. I’ll let
    them—let that [voice trails off].

    Reporter [#15]: How many boys and how many girls [were killed]?

    Carver: [Slowly shaking his head] I don’t know.

    More Unanswered Questions and Inconsistencies

    In
    addition to Carver’s remarks several additional chronological
    and evidentiary contradictions in the official version of the Sandy Hook
    shooting are cause for serious consideration and leave doubt in terms
    of how the event transpired vis-à-vis the way authorities and major
    media outlets have presented it. It is now well known that early on
    journalists reported that Adam Lanza’s brother Ryan Lanza was
    reported to be the gunman, and that pistols were used in the shooting
    rather than a rifle. Yet these are merely the tip of the iceberg.

    When Did the Gunman Arrive?

    After
    Adam Lanza fatally shot and killed his mother at his residence, he
    drove himself to the elementary school campus, arriving one half hour
    after classes had commenced. Dressed in black, Lanza proceeds completely
    unnoticed through an oddly vacant parking lot with a military style
    rifle and shoots his way through double glass doors and a brand new yet
    apparently poorly engineered security system.

    Further, initial
    press accounts suggest how no school personnel or students heard
    gunshots and no 911 calls are made until after Lanza begins firing
    inside the facility. “It was a lovely day,” Sandy Hook fourth grade
    teacher Theodore Varga said. And then, suddenly and unfathomably,
    gunshots rang out. “I can’t even remember how many,” Varga said.[5]

    The recollection contrasts sharply with an updated version of Lanza’s arrival where at 9:30AM he

    walked up to the front entrance and fired at least a half dozen
    rounds into the glass doors. The thunderous sound of Lanza blowing an
    opening big enough to walk through the locked school door caused
    Principal Dawn Hochsprung and school psychologist Mary Scherlach to bolt
    from a nearby meeting room to investigate. He shot and killed them both
    as they ran toward him.

    Breaching the school’s security
    system in such a way would have likely triggered some automatic alert
    of school personnel. Further, why would the school’s
    administrators run toward an armed man who has just noisily blasted his
    way into the building?

    Two other staff members attending the
    meeting with Hocksprung and Scherlach sustained injuries “in
    the hail of bullets” but returned to the aforementioned meeting
    room and managed a call to 911.[6] This contrasted with earlier reports
    where the first 911 call claimed students “were trapped in a
    classroom with the adult shooter who had two guns.”[7]
    Recordings of the first police dispatch following the 911 call at
    9:35:50 indicate that someone “thinks there’s someone shooting
    in the building.”[8] There is a clear distinction between potentially
    hearing shots somewhere in the building and being almost mortally caught
    in a “hail of bullets.”

    How did the gunman fire so many shots in such little time?

    According
    to Dr. Carver and State Police, Lanza shot each victim between 3 and 11
    times during a 5 to 7 minute span. If one is to average this out to 7
    bullets per individual—excluding misses—Lanza shot 182
    times, or once every two seconds. Yet according to the official story
    Lanza was the sole assassin and armed with only one weapon. Thus if
    misses and changing the gun’s 30-shot magazine at least 6 times
    are added to the equation Lanza must have been averaging about one shot
    per second—extremely skilled use of a single firearm for a
    young man with absolutely no military training and who was on the verge
    of being institutionalized. Still, an accurate rendering of the event is
    even more difficult to arrive at because the chief medical examiner
    admittedly has no idea exactly how the children were shot or whether a
    struggle ensued.

    Where is the Photo and Video Evidence?

    Photographic
    and video evidence is at once profuse yet lacking in terms of its
    capacity to demonstrate that a mass shooting took place on the scale
    described by authorities. For example, in an era of ubiquitous video
    surveillance of public buildings especially no visual evidence of
    Lanza’s violent entry has emerged. And while studio snapshots
    of the Sandy Hook victims abound there is little if any eyewitness
    testimony of anyone who’s observed the corpses except for
    Carver and his staff, and they appear almost as confused about the
    conditions of the deceased as any layperson watching televised coverage
    of the event. Nor are there any routine eyewitness, photo or video
    evidence of the crime scene’s aftermath—broken glass, blasted
    security locks and doors, bullet casings and holes, bloodied walls and
    floors—all of which are common in such investigations and
    reportage.

    Why Were Medical Personnel Turned Away From the Crime Scene?

    Oddly
    enough medical personnel are forced to set up their operation not at
    the school where the dead and injured lay, but rather at the fire
    station several hundred feet away. This flies in the face of standard
    medical operating procedure where personnel are situated as close to the
    scene as possible. There is no doubt that the school had ample room to
    accommodate such personnel. Yet medical responders who rushed to Sandy
    Hill Elementary upon receiving word of the tragedy were denied entry to
    the school and forced to set up primary and secondary triages off school
    grounds and wait for the injured to be brought to them.

    Shortly
    after the shooting “as other ambulances from neighboring
    communities rolled up, sirens blaring, the first responders slowly
    realized that their training would be tragically underutilized on this
    horrible day. ‘You may not be able to save everybody, but you
    damn well try,’” 44 year old emergency medical
    technician James Wolff told NBC News. “’And when (we)
    didn’t have the opportunity to put our skills into action, it’s
    difficult.’”[9]

    In light of this, who were the
    qualified medical practitioners pronounced the 20 children and 7 adults
    dead? Who decided that none could be revived? Carver and his staff are
    apparently the only medical personnel to have attended to the
    victims—yet this was in the postmortem conducted several hours
    later. Such slipshod handling of the crime scene leaves the State of
    Connecticut open to a potential array of hefty civil claims by families
    of the slain.

    Did a mass evacuation of the school take place?

    Sandy
    Hook Elementary is attended by 600 students. Yet there is no
    photographic or video evidence of an evacuation on this scale. Instead,
    limited video and photographic imagery suggest that a limited evacuation
    of perhaps at most several dozen students occurred.

    A highly
    circulated photo depicts students walking in a single file formation
    with their hands on each others’ shoulders and eyes shut. Yet
    this was the image of a drill that took place prior to the event
    itself.[10] Most other photos are portraits of individual children.
    Despite aerial video footage of the event documenting law enforcement
    scouring the scene and apprehending one or more suspects in the wooded
    area nearby the school,[11] there is no such evidence that a mass exodus
    of children from the school transpired once law enforcement pronounced
    Sandy Hook secure. Nor are there videos or photos of several hundred
    students and their parents at the oft-referenced fire station nearby
    where students were routed for parent pick up.

    Sound Bite Prism and the Will to Believe

    Outside
    of a handful of citizen journalists and alternative media commentators
    Sandy Hill’s dramatically shifting factual and circumstantial
    terrain has escaped serious critique because it is presented through
    major media’s carefully constructed prism of select sound bites
    alongside a widespread and longstanding cultural impulse to accept the
    pronouncements of experts, be they bemused physicians, high ranking law
    enforcement officers, or political leaders demonstrating
    emotionally-grounded concern.

    Political scientist W. Lance
    Bennett calls this the news media’s
    “authority-disorder bias.” “Whether the world
    is returned to a safe, normal place,” Bennett writes,
    “or whether the very idea of a normal world is called into
    question, the news is preoccupied with order, along with related
    questions of whether authorities are capable of establishing or
    restoring it.”[12]

    Despite Carver’s bizarre
    performance and law enforcement authorities’ inability to
    settle on and relay simple facts, media management’s impulse to
    assure audiences and readerships of the Newtown community’s
    inevitable adjustment to its trauma and loss with the aid of the
    government’s protective oversight—however incompetent
    that may be—far surpasses a willingness to undermine this now
    almost universal news media narrative with messy questions and
    suggestions of intrigue. This well-worn script is one the public has
    been conditioned to accept. If few people relied on such media to
    develop their world view this would hardly be a concern. Yet this is
    regrettably not the case.

    The Sandy Hook tragedy was on a far
    larger scale than the past year’s numerous slaughters,
    including the Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting and the Batman theater
    shooting in Colorado. It also included glaringly illogical exercises and
    pronouncements by authorities alongside remarkably unusual evidentiary
    fissures indistinguishable by an American political imagination
    cultivated to believe that the corporate, government and
    military’s sophisticated system of organized crime is largely
    confined to Hollywood-style storylines while really existing malfeasance
    and crises are without exception returned to normalcy.

    If recent
    history is a prelude the likelihood of citizens collectively assessing
    and questioning Sandy Hook is limited even given the event’s
    overtly superficial trappings. While the incident is ostensibly being
    handled by Connecticut law enforcement, early reports indicate how
    federal authorities were on the scene as the 911 call was received.
    Regardless of where one stands on the Second Amendment and gun control,
    it is not unreasonable to suggest the Obama administration complicity or
    direct oversight of an incident that has in very short order sparked a
    national debate on the very topic—and not coincidentally
    remains a key piece of Obama’s political platform.

    The
    move to railroad this program through with the aid of major media and an
    irrefutable barrage of children’s portraits,
    “heartfelt” platitudes and ostensible tears
    neutralizes a quest for genuine evidence, reasoned observation and in
    the case of Newtown honest and responsible law enforcement. Moreover, to
    suggest that Obama is not capable of deploying such techniques to
    achieve political ends is to similarly place ones faith in image and
    interpretation above substance and established fact, the exact
    inclination that in sum has brought America to such an impasse.

    Notes

    [1]
    State of Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public
    Protection, ”State Police Investigate Newtown School
    Shooting” [Press Release] December 15, 2012.

    [2] State
    of Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection,
    “Update: Newtown School Shooting” [Press Release],
    December 19, 2012.

    [3] CNN, “Family of 6 Year Old
    Victim,” December 14, 2012, “Sandy Hook School
    Shooting Hoax Fraud,” Youtube, December 17, 2012.

    [4]
    Hartford Courant, “Finally ‘Enough’ For Chief
    Medical Examiner” [Editorial], January 30, 2012.

    [5]
    John Christofferson and Jocelyn Noveck, “Sandy Hook School
    Shooting: Adam Lanza Kills 26 and Himself at Connecticut
    School,” Huffington Post, December 15, 2012.

    [6] Edmund
    H. Mahoney, Dave Altmari, and Jon Lender, “Sandy Hook
    Shooter’s Pause May Have Aided Escape,” Hartford
    Courant, December 23, 2012.

    [7] Jaweed Kaleem, “Sandy
    Hook Elementary School Shooting: Newtown Connecticut Students,
    Administrators Among Victims, Reports Say,” Huffington Post,
    December 14, 2012.

    [8] RadioMan911TV, “Sandy Hook
    Elementary School Shooting Newtown Police / Fire and CT State
    Police,” Youtube, December 14, 2012. At several points in this
    recording audio is scrambled, particularly following apprehension of a
    second shooting suspect outside the school, suggesting a purposeful
    attempt to withhold vital information.

    [9] Miranda Leitsinger,
    “You Feel Helpless: First Responders Rushed to School After
    Shooting, Only to Wait,” US News on NBC, December 20.

    [10] http://thenetng.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Sandy-Hook-Elementary-School-600×400.jpg

    [11] Rob Dew, “Evidence of 2nd and 3rd Shooter at Sandy Hook,” Infowars Nightly News, December 18, 2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nCFHImNeRw.
    A more detailed yet less polished analysis was developed by citizen
    journalist Idahopicker, “Sandy Hook Elem: 3 Shooters,”
    December 16, 2012. See also James F. Tracy, “Analyzing the Newtown
    Narrative: Sandy Hook’s Disappearing Shooter Suspects,”
    Memoryholeblog.com, December 20, 2012.

    [12] W. Lance Bennett, News: The Politics of Illusion 9th Edition, Boston: Longman, 2012, 47.

    • fed up

      THE MORE I READ AND SEE ….. THE MORE I BELIEVE IT! i wouldnt put anything past o stinko and his henchmen

    • Tim_the_Bald

      Brilliant and totally destroys the original article.

    • Sandra Dee

      Adam, you have presented a concise, logical argument to refute this robot “so called” REPORTER’S? ridiculous contentions. In addition to all the factual evidence you have presented, there are many other inconsistencies to this story, e.g., the car in which the gun was found was registered to a total stranger, the media reported early on that Adam Lanza’s uncle had said his mother was trying to get him committed, there was also a report that this young man (not his brother–if he had one) had changed his name to Ryan several years ago. It was also reported that both Adam and his mother had ties to this school, and that in fact, his mother was a kindergarten teacher there–both wrong! Indeed, where is any video from within the school. Even at Columbine, there was video tape of these shooters. Strange, since a new system had just been installed. And WHERE were those 600 children who attended this school? No pictures at all of any evacuations. Most importantly, in regard to the parents. It was not just their reactions–no sadness–no tears. If my child had been killed, I would not have cared what condition they were in, I would have demanded I see their body. If this were real, there would have had to have been at least one parent like me who would have demanded this. Well, let’s see how they spin your very accurate, logical argument, Adams. My guess would be either your post will soon disappear or this entire article. Didn’t do what they had planned for it to do-to express outrage that someone would question the shooting of children and we are just being mean to the parents to suggest such. Sorry-too many are awakening to the b. s. !

      • singingcowboy674

        Thank you hon. But sadly I can’t claim it as my own. I’m just parroting what was sent to me is all, but I did find it worth of inclusion in a rebut. If you want a more damning look at the incidents of that day and the investigation that followed, watch this….http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8&list=LL9JoiaopyaPiLgGmMHnRpRQ&feature=mh_lolz and then I believe there is a part 2 that is offered that I did not include. In fact I know there is. But it should be easily gettable on YouTube suggestions. Thirdly, take a look at all the actors and actresses that CNN and the other alphabet soup news agencies used in the aftermath. I truly don’t know if we haven even heard from a single family in truth. http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/tag/jennifer-greenberg-sexton/

  • noname

    there is also that pesky little fact that united way published online their SandyHook Relief fund site on December 11… 3 days before the massacre…. think about that one for a minute,

    • beijingyank

      Oh this is ugly.

      • madmemere

        beijingyank – The more you dig into it, the more ugly it gets. Read my post, above and I encourage you to research, research, and research some more.

        News coptor and police radio sound bytes have “disappeared”; witness testimony, in Aurora, Co- -”tear gas cannisters tossed from different directions”; “more than one person at that exit door”! In Sandy Hook, a news coptor video plainly showed law enforcement in pursuit of two individuals, into the woods, behind the school. A police sound byte- “I’ve got one proned out”. Shortly after, a little 6 yr-old, on video – “We ran out the back door and I saw a man laying on the ground”! If I had not, personally, heard those sound bytes, those witnesses, or watched the pursuit video, I wouldn’t even mention it.
        James Holmes-the “alleged theater shooter”, had already resigned from university, yet was “awarded” a $26,000 (twenty-six thousand) “federal grant”; that is alleged to be the money he used to purchase guns, ammo and tactical gear, for the shooting and the materials used to booby trap his apartment. At university he studied neuroscience; nothing to do with bombs, nor guns. He’s 24, under a psychiatrist’s care and psychotropic (mind control) drugs! Originally, police claimed “his apartment was expertly rigged, to cause a tremendous amount of destruction”!!

        • beijingyank

          “…united way published online their Sandy Hook Relief fund site on December 11… 3 days before the massacre…” This is insane. How could this be true? Please tell me fast and furiously, how this can be true?

          • madmemere

            Dare say, the “community organizer” has a very “extensive organization”, or his “handlers/planners” are extremely busy people! That’s about as “fast and furious” as I can make it.

          • Pete

            Here’s another shocker, google “Rex 84″.

          • Loki

            If you go on Google, you can see the date a website was created, it was made on the 11th, I saw it myself, go to Google, and do a search about sandy hook, then go into the custom search settings and set it to look between Dec 8 and Dec 12. but hey nothing to see here, just move on…

          • Spacewarp

            Loki, if you go back to March 8 of 2012, and range between that and March 12 of 2012, you’ll also see a site by them and a bunch of other links that will cause you to think that they created the site much earlier. The reality is, Google is messed up on their date range searches.

          • beijingyank

            This United Way account being created three days BEFORE the shooting must be vetted…So what is it? Is it a Google mess up, or is the United Way account dtd March 11 a fact?

        • Pete

          There is a CIA program called Orion, where drugs and brainwashing are used on mental patients to create certain behaviors!

    • QuisPercusit

      I bet all evidence of that is either destroyed or digitalized into a Sponge Bob Square pants cartoon by now.

    • rennyangel2

      Is that true? I’ll have to see if I can find it.

    • Roy

      This is the one that gets me. The page has since been taken down.

    • randellmd

      and facebook and other donation sites as well.

    • An American Hero

      You made a great point that even this reporter is overlooking, what is bad is the media only shows their point not necessarily the truth but what fits their own agenda. You will be very hard pressed to find a truthful and honest journalist in current media.

    • Melia Sese

      Just another tidbit I have posted down below (but some might not find it easily):

      Nancy Champion Lanza (full name) is a CIA asset working for DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and the shootings by her son were a DARPA “experiment” overseen by her. The weapons are said to be standard CIA issue (perhaps some of the more astute people on this board can confirm that?) Nancy was apparently relocated to Connecticut where she would work on DARPA projects at the US Naval Submarine Base in Groton, CT. She was reportedly working on video-game simulation of submarine warfare. CIA agent Amir Mirza Hekmati (recently arrested in Iran) claimed that video games are used as weapons of psychological warfare to justify US military actions.

      Are any of you all familiar with this part of the narrative? Can we rule out her son as yet another CIA “mind control experiment” (similar to Oswald and Sirhan) that of course willl never remember anything that happened – assuming he even survives the operation. If his mom is another government agent … also, why can’t we find any records on these two? Perhaps these aren’t even their real names …

      • Sandra Dee

        Apparently, no one could confirm they had even seen this boy for 3 years. I believe something probably went very wrong for this young man. He never made it to his intended target.

    • Patrioticprepper

      You’re forgetting the r.i.p page made two day before the massacre for the teacher..

    • dirtmound

      FOR FUCK’S SAKE! That date’s a Google guessitmate based on key files found on the server – files that can come in a pre-packaged template or server maintenance before any site was built, coupled with a mathematical formula it uses in it’s search engine. Do you really think Google is able to track down EVERY website on the planet on the day it was made?

      • singingcowboy674

        Yes. They have to be. They are part of the US intel hub. NSA. You don’t think they have the computing power to log all that? Also, when a webpage has the exact date as part of the URL itself, that is not “google guesstimation”.

    • James Fontana

      How about senator Fiensteins anti gun bill written two days before the shooting? Was Obama really behind this? He IS that much of a monster.

  • Buck

    Wrong , it has been admitted that he used FOUR handguns and NO AR-15 on ABC TV no less , but MY big question from both shootings concerns the ” 2nd shooter ” first reported but then not mentioned any more .

    • http://www.facebook.com/robert.andersonsr Robert Anderson Sr

      Possibly a hunter in the woods or one of the ACTORS got lost ?

      • MudEngineer

        On the news clip that I saw the man was chased into the woods by law enforcement and was captured. What happened to him after that? There are way more questions on this shooting than answers and the press are not digging into this at all!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/George-Reichel/100000234315027 George Reichel

      He was there “to document the event”.

    • JJM123

      A report a month ago I read stated 4 handguns and 4 long guns were transported to the school by the shooter. We know that 1 or more of the long guns were found in the car. Possible but not likely that he would haul 5, 6 or 7 guns into a killing zone.
      And then we do have the 3 people running away into the woods. From the helicopter film, none looked like LEO.
      We must demand independent balistics analysis of every shot within the school to determine what weapon/s were shot and whether all shots match the identified weapons.

    • RacerJim

      Like the “2nd terrorist” first reported to have exited from the passenger-side and run away from the rental truck just before it blew up and destroyed the Alfred P Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995.

  • 7Up_Rocks

    I saw an interview with a parent who slipped up and said she got a text message concerning the incident from CBS. How and why would a news station be texting a parent? Explain that.

  • idagney

    Very sad attempt at answering questions no one asked, while avoiding the very questions that remain. Typical MSM misdirection.

  • pissed off conservative

    i disagree with the author i have no dought in my mind this was done with the help from our own government..cia..just like the batman shooting people saw two or three shooters entering the theater..you think our government would not sacrafice innocent children to get what they want..gun control..just watch if our lier in thief ohdumbass doesnt get what he wants there will be more school shootings..untill people finally give in ..you liberals make me sick..your concerned about children?? what a f ing joke wile you let 2000 babies get aborted every day

    • IrishMikeBaker

      Maybe when you go back to English class and learn about punctuation and capitalization someone will take you seriously.

      • lorlan4

        Why does some jerk always worry about spelling, punctuation marks and proper english? I and everyone else understand what’s written, just takes a little common sense!!!

        • JohnC

          It is because liberals will not debate or admit that abortion is the deliberate murder of babies instead it will become about grammar or spelling since they have no other way to defend this

        • Berzrkr50

          Because it’s really a Troll trying to get people onto another topic… Away with you Troll!

        • Sandra Dee

          Some “jerk” always worries about spelling and grammar because it happens to be IMPORTANT, even though the brainwashing going on in our schools and in the media wants you to believe it isn’t. It only showcases the extreme dumbing down of the educational system in the last 30 years. A concerted effort by the government to produce nothing but robots, unable to think or communicate a thought. THAT’S WHY!

      • aaron

        up yours lib .!..

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carole-Wood/1804287853 Carole Wood

      Pissed off with you. Liberals are absolutely OK with the murder of babies every minute, that’s OK. And homosexual marriage,,, yep unnatural unions… that’s OK also. There’s a common thread to all these mass murders in the last 20+ years…. mental illness and DRUGS (legally prescribed,,,but which have very bad side effects). Then there’s a drug call scopamine (sp) that allows the ‘administrator’ to coach the recepient into actions they would not normally do, they can function but when the drug wears off they have no memory of what they did. Getting back to the Liberal/Socialist/Commies….. they just love that Ovomit’s first ‘duty’ in 2009 was to reinstate partial birth abortions. That’s done to a VIABLE LIVING BABY as they are born,,,,the doctor cuts the spinal cord as it is being born, if that doesn’t kill it then then stick a rod up the back of the head into the brain. But THIS isn’t murder to the libs. Nice group of folks.

      • El_Love

        Did barry not say he was going to fundamentally transform America? Looks like that is what is happening to me. Think about what has happened in the last 4 years — so much we have forgotten, too many things to name and keep track of, the inability to know whom to trust and what to trust, fear, loathing, misinformation, lies, scandals, cover-ups, corruption, executive orders, vitriol, class warfare, false villification of opponents of liberals, government overreach, disarming citizens, propaganda, using children as pawns …. I think that is what a “fundamental transformation” looks like

  • Steven

    While it’s often best not to engage with conspiracy theorists on their own turf, as you can probably never convince them,

    If nothing else, THIS statement is proven by the comments.

  • Doc

    Never let the truth screw up a perfectly good news report.

    • QuisPercusit

      Boy Have you got that right Doc!

  • Victor

    I disagree! Problem is the VERY FIRST, first-born blood covenant of DEATH made 6,000 years ago between our FIRST MOTHER, HER FIRST-BORN SON, CAIN, & LUCIFER, the DEVIL! U.S., Being Israel by the seed of Joseph(Gen. 48:16) & proven by brother England, not Judah, only promised Grace(Messiah, not name: Gen. 49:10), it was England’s brother u.s. that put over u.s. BY WOMEN ALONE(WELCOME TO ADAM’S WORLD EVEN BEFORE THE FIRST MURDERER WAS EVEN BORN) not only the “FORBIDDEN FOREIGNER”(NON-ANGLO-SAXON & NOTICE THAT IT WAS NOT AN ITALIAN OR GREEK), but also the “RIGHT” ANTI-CHRIST(MARXIST) OVER U.S. THIS TIME in Revelation, chapter 11! And here’s our FATE ANGLO-SAXONS: Only 144,000 Anglo-Saxons, 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes with the tribe of JOSEPH replacing the tribe of DAN(Irish, who really were Jesuits who came to America when it was still illegal for Roman Catholics to even enter America) as being protected during the end-time of the two-witnesses of Revelation, chapter 11! No? Watch, and it WILL NOT TAKE MUCH LONGER EITHER! While I know that MARXISM(ANTI-CHRIST) IS NOW BACKED BY OUR WOMEN & BLACKS ALONE, it’s mostly NOT going to END WELL for either, especially for Blacks the first time around because at least 72,000 Anglo-Saxon WOMEN will remain alive states Revelation, chapter 7! Also it is written that the FIRST(CAIN) will be LAST, and the LAST(ABLE) MURDERED BY CAIN(& EVE?) will be FIRST to become resurrected. No, I didn’t write that in the Hebrew, not even Greek(Zeph. 3:9, Acts 26:14, 1 Cor. 4:6) inspired Scriptures, better people than I did though! Just saying… AGAIN, WATCH!

    • Victor

      P.S. NO? WELL “THINK” ABOUT THE VOTING BLOCK WITH OBAMA, HE, THIS TIME, BEING THE “RIGHT” ANTI-CHRIST(MARXIST) OVER U.S., UNLIKE WILSON, FDR, CARTER, ETC., ETC. ETC…AGAIN, I DIDN”T MAKE THIS UP, IT’S WRITTEN BY BETTER FOLKS THAN I…

  • VeeDub57

    There will always be conspiracy theories surrounding every major event in our lives. JFK, Monroe, Titanic, 9/11. AND there is always some bits and pieces of truth, or missing information, that feeds them.

    It’s up to us as intelligent people to filter through ALL of the information each person can get their hands on (and in this day & time it’s limitless) and make an intelligent determination that we, as an individual, can be satisfied with.

    Just look at how many (supposedly) intelligent people still believe in the biggest theory hoax of all time. Most of them are (supposedly) dedicated, educators. And most of them shove the “theory” of evolution down the throats of our children every day at school.

    There’s been no decisive proof for the “theory” of evolution. Yet the government requires that it be taught as fact.

  • halfbreed

    What about NBC admitting no assault Rifle was used????
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJkvB9goPAA

    • halfbreed

      The woman that supposedly looks the same is an Actress that is well known in Hollyweird! She is seen as the Jokers (Colorado Shooting) then again at Sandy Hook as a parent who’s child had been just shot??? They list her name???

    • QuisPercusit

      Of all the Networks NBC is probably the least trustworthy especiall since the GM Side saddle gas tank charade they tried to pull. and the $64.000, question no make that CBS after theire fiai honest and unbiased coverage of the Viet nam War. or maybe its ABC who is least trustworth y after their coverage of the LA bank Shoot out and the OJ Simpson fiascos. So many choices, so many decisions ; best not to trust any of them especially if it deals with guns, the environment the government Benghazi or Afghanistan or oil pipe lnes.

      • Melia Sese

        NBC is compromised because (1) they used to be owned by General Electric, whose boss Jeffrey Immelt was chairman of Barry’s jobs council, and (2) they were sold to Comcast, whose boss, Brian Roberts is another big Dem and Obama supporter.

        • BeautifulAmerica

          All too true. All too corrupt. And moated by their hiring policy: agree with their NWO dreams, or no job.

  • armydadtexas1

    Sandy Hook was not about guns it was, will be and is about evil decending on the innocent. Politicians turned it into an issue on guns. Anti-second amendment assclowns, turned it into an issue on our second amendment rights and B.HO and the democ-RATS are now trying to use it as a hammer to destroy the United States Constitution. They already attack; on a regular basis; Our First Amendment Rights. Now they are attacking The 2nd Amendment, while hiding behind Children in the most cowardly and cynical attack yet. The only way this is going to stop is We, The People, Holding B.HO and all of congress accountable for their contemptable, manipulative behavior. And to do that we must unite as a movement and run them out of office and ultimately out of D.C. Until then, this kind of constant attack will continue.

  • hiskid1964

    there were four guns found at the seine all pistols http://conservativevideos.com/2012/12/growing-evidence-an-ar15-wasnt-used-in-sandy-hook-massacre/ get your facts strait

    • Winston Hibler

      You’d be more convincing if you’d learn to spell.

      • knowitall

        Agree ,but what he says is TRUE ! 4 handguns.

  • Mike

    What about the websites and face book posts that happened before the shooting even took place? Can you explain that one please author?

  • Jack

    What about th doors of the school being broke into by the shooter.We have not to this day seen any picture of the door at that school. You are telling me that there was not a single security camera anywhere in that school.There is a security camera ever where you go and even in schools .There is no video from anybody at that school.No cell phone recorded from anybody.My word everbody has a cell phone .You are telling not a person did not film this man on ther phones.Or better yet (if did happen) the front of the school that the shooter kick the door down. You may to want to watch the video footage of the medical examiner who was sent to examine the scene .He’s answers on what he saw and what he sayed are so confuseing you wonder if he was told what to say ,and he couldn’t get his story right .It is clearly he was force to be told what he sayed by somebody and trying to do his job right .It was like he was fighting two personality sides in him. The person that wrote this.You may want to look at the video of one of the witness that saw another person that was handcuff.That was in front of the poilce car.Or better yet look at the film footage of the police chasing after a gunman in the forest.But yet no follow up on who that was.You may want to look at some videos say about 2010 what that city look like.Believe me it was not the nice place you want to be at that the media says it was.Take a look at the well attractive people who just thought .It was a nice to start a business up or even bar.It is like this would people that live in the hamptons would, they decided to move to death valley .Not a chance .I mean there are lots of places .They could have gone to to open there business up why there?. When you ear this people talk it is something you would hear from a person that was feed talking points .That you have heard from famous people or sports players that you have heard over and over again .So this was the event was in the processing of happeing two years ago.There is now way two years ago that you would see well dress people who had a good life .Ever move in a place like Sandy hook two years ago .I can’s stand people that are worry that they will be called conspiracy nut cases if they question ,what ever the goverment mouth piece media feeds them.In order for them to keep there jobs or be accepted in the media circles.To be able to get a job with the media that are control.I do think that that the person that wrote this has that problem.What a coward you are.One more thing you sayed people reacted diffrent ways when they lose somebody. Really !! so you are telling me that most of the people in that shooting out of them .Only two people really show any emotion and those two didn’t even have a tear coming out of ther eyes.So I guess what you are saying is that most people who lose a love one .They to just like those people they will go on Tv the next day and tell the whole world about who they lose.With smiles and not have any tears at all.If you Mr Daily lose somebody ,would you be caught laughing on cnn before you talk.Then when you realize that the cameras are on.That you try to cry and smile most of the time and go to the next camera and reporter ,You see to talk about your daughter and smile most of the time. I mean everbody in that shooting could not wait to get on TV .Would you Mr Daily go on ever reporter and talk about your daughter you just lost. No the only people that love that kind of attention.,are actress and actors .Or people that were told to go on as many media outlets and get as much as attention.So that people in this country get angry at gun owners and our right to own guns. Most Normal people would be so devasted that the last thing they want to,is to run to the media and talk about who they lost in there family.Just smile away and just never as a person that watches this,You don’t seem to question when ever single person who lost there child , says the same thing over again like”Well he is she was such a good kid and could do no harm and he or she was going to be this one day “.That I heard over and over again.That does not seem to you like a prehearse acting speech , You don’t found it strange.Here’s something else that you should question this . Not a single media station anywhere.Has not mention of this same suppose shootings that happen in Germany .About two years ago . Where a man put on a bulllet proof vest and got a lot guns and went in a school .Like this and sadley killed innocent kids.Now you don’t think that is strange .That those same shooting in Germany are almost the same at Sandy hook.Of course our goverment would never try to copy that would they no . Now if Germany had such good gun laws there like we have here.Do you think that the media would report what happen in Germany to what happen in Sandy hook.They would in seconds but they didn’t why?. Well it is because in Germany they don’t allow anybody to have guns.But yet somebody was able to get guns and hurt inncoent kids.Then the media would have to admit that gun laws don’t stop sick people from doing harm.That is why you don’t hear anything about that.

    • MrLogical

      Uhhh, Jack…. I think you need to change the tinfoil and stay out of the sun for a while. If symptoms persist, I suggest you make an appointment with a psychiatrist.

      PS: Buy yourself a dictionary too.

      • Jack

        Me need help no I am fine .But thanks for the worthless opinions Mr Logical. No unlike you who is a coward that does not want to hear the truth.Because of fear of losing your job . I did watch all the video’s of the Sandy Hook shootings .I didn’t inhale the media and goverment spin unlike you who did. I can have a smart enough brain(unlike you ) that can question the goverment mouth piece media . I got and idea for you to get some education in your brain on these shootings .Go on youtube and type in the Sandy hook hoax . Then go back to me and still tell me,if you think I need a tinfoil on my head alright. I think it is you that needs to get help.Do you know what is that you need help on and it is very bad disease ,that you got .It is called “I got my head up my butt to long disease”.Mr Logical how about Mr Clueless Logical.I did my homework on these shootings unlike you who does not. You seem to Choose to have your head up your butt . But nice try though on getting me to look crazy.You tell me one thing I sayed wrong alright .You will not because you are wrong .But what I like about people like you.Is that you call people conspiracy nuts .But you can’t ever tell them where they are wrong at. You just run away and call them nuts . That is being close minded and a coward. Just look at the videos on youtube on the Sandy Hook Shootings.Get back to me on where I was wrong .Next time do you homework on who’s the person needs help because it is not me.Ps: look at yourself before you call anybody a person with a foil on there head alike you who has one on .Yikes!! scary

        • TexasLadyJuanita

          Not only do many liberals not respond with a different truth backed up by facts, but many liberals will tell you to your face (even your friends and family) that they believe opposite of you – imply that your thinking is flawed – but will not have a friendly debate about your flawed thinking. For a person who uses critical thinking to process the news – is an act of hostility as many a liberal sees it. Many are so brainwashed that they truly appear to have zero thinking skills.

          • Jack

            I like the way you think .You are so right I am blow away.They do is when they lose a debate ,the only thing thing they got is not to accept they lose.They can’t never do that.So what they do is they try to put you down and say you are stupid or your a conspiracy nut. But gets to me is that they think.That goverment is wonderful just as long as it does not get,in there lifes .So when the goverment says that this shooting in Sandy hook was done.By this one person and yet there is not a single video of ,the damage inside the school.I mean there is no pictures of the front of the school.That does not seem to the strange to most people .But most liberals think that goverment is never wrong.But lets not forget most of these same people.Were spoil brat kids who had peace sign shirts on.They were screwing each other and taking drugs to 1967 to 72 .They also scream for less goverment and thought the goverment was spying on them.So now these same spoil brats people .Who have the most stupid thoughts that you could ever imagine.So what are they doing to this country.They are trying there best to make sure.More goverment gets in ever part of our lifes .Just as long as it does not get in there lifes .What hypocrites .They believe to that they have kindness in them and you don’t .What always like to point to them when they talk about liberal presidents how good they were . I had it out with a debate on people who like the clintons.Who they think care about the poor and chlidren.So what I did was tell them .To go on there computers and look up Randy weaver and what happen in Waco,Texas .Then I told them ,you show me where the clintons kind hear,toward those people what they did to them. In Waco ,Texas innocent chlidren were killed by this goverment.I sayed just look at the hearings where the attoreny General had to admit.It was the explosions that the agents set off.That cause that fire .Then you look at Randy weaver what happen to him.He’s pregnant wife gets shoot and killed by goverment agents.Now do you think they admit they were wrong.No way they ran away .Like Mr Logical did.See the silmilarites .I love to see what Mr Logical has to say on what happening in Texas and Randy weaver.Just love to here he’s answer .But just like in Sandy people like Mr logical and many other liberals ,who love goverment ,they will tell you the most dumbest answers on what happen to Randy Weaver and Waco Texas,that you will wonder who are the people that are nuts,It is not you or me anybody that question’s goverment .It is these rich liberals who have nothing to do,but to put down people who questions goverment .They will tell you just how goverment was just wonderrful in those events that happen in Waco ,Texas and Randy weaver .

          • Sandra Dee

            Time to get off the right vs. left thing. THEY are ALL THE SAME, but they use these divisions to distract us and keep us fighting among ourselves so we don’t pay attention to what BOTH SIDES are doing. Wake up!

      • Sandra Dee

        Whatever your arguments, you know you should really get a new line to throw at people who don’t buy the “official story”. The “tin-foil hat” thing is really getting old, but still perpetuated by the mass media to which you obviously listen.

    • LogicDefined

      I find it strange that no one mentions that Eric Holder was enroute to Newtown the next day. That’s when the reports about the two suspects disappeared. Where are those suspects since no one is talking about them? One was (the 1st day) in the front seat of the patrol car. Where are these people? and why has no one seen pictures of the carnage?
      There wouldn’t be “conspiracy theories” if there weren’t so many holes in the reports media gave. This is an insult to our intelligence. You know how it feels when someone lies to your face and you know they’re lying and what’s worse, they know that you know they’re lying! However, I believe their sloppiness is intended, simply because they WANT us to know. If they are willing to show their cards, the game is about over.

      • Jack

        Never heard that before .So Eric Holder was on his way I didn’t know that .But careful Mr Logical and members of the media.Will call you a nut .Even though you are right and had check on that story . But Good job Logic Defined .You are right about what you sayed on “conspiracy theories . Now I don’t believe in all of them,Like the end of the world on December 21 .I look into that to and just didn’t add up in my mind.So I don’t believe in all conspiracys . I got to look at a lot before I say that is a conspiracy .But what makes me laugh is the same people in the media.That put down people who question any of these shootings and call them conspiracy nuts .These same people could not wait to put all those story’s of the end of the world .They really made you think it was going to happen.But people who do believe these shootings were a set up by thsie goverment.They had all the information to back up to what they are saying.They are laugh at and called freaks by these same media . I just laugh at that when I see the media’s calling people that don’t believe in these shootings ,that they are conspiracy nuts. So why didn’t they say the same thing of the people,who thought the on the end of the world ,will happen December 21.That one I can’t think of why. But lets say you are a person that does not believe in conspiracy theories.Going in to any website that carrys the videos from people and the media at Sandy Hook .Just looking at it . You have to say there is something wrong and something missing in this . You just have to then stop and look at the videos all of them .You have to as a person that does not believe in conspiracys .That there is something that does not make any sense in any of this . Look at all the shootings that have happen .It is not just one shooting I mean a lot.If there was not any shootings before Sandy .No leaders screaming for more gun control .You see video of him going in the school(that yet we have not seen). People not waiting to get there faces on tv and talking about losing there kids. I would had never thought there was anything strange at this shooting.Then a person that went nuts . But there is just so many questions I have on this, that most people I am sure feel the same way.I did see the video of what Sandy hook look like two years ago,it was not the town.You want to live at . But now it looks like the town where you want to live at .It just to me so strange in that town when they talk. They just sound like person that just say’s things that somebody told them what they sayed . It is like the movie where Jim carey is in a place where he has been where he was born and live at all his life .The truman show .Where everbody talks like a robot being told what to say .That is what I am saying about this town. Before I say this.I will say I was wrong on this if this does not happen. Now it would not surprise me that that school is close forever .Then the town will not be talk about again in the media .All those people in that town would just had disappear .Never to be seen again.But they will wait until some other big event happens,that gets the attention away from them . Nobody will even realize it until years later . That great town we all hear about that had this shooting. Will have more bugs and rats two years from now then people in that town.Nobody will ever question where all these people went. Like I sayed if I am wrong I will say I am. But just take a look at ,what Sandy look like two years ago .It was a dump. Even if the media talks about the town being empty .It will with the goverment and the media will say ,the reason why Sandy is now empty is because of guns and what happen at that school .The media will try again to blame guns is the reason why people left that town two years from now . Not because they did there job for the goverment that pull of the best scam ever over the idiots ,in this country that believe in what happen in Sandy did happen .They did a good job of making you think that they lost a child . No no that will never be talk about. But what gets to me .Is that there are people like Mr Logical .Who called people conspiracy nuts. Even though they don’t tell you where you are wrong about .Now I have had many opinions on other patriot websites like this .What I seen at least more often is that. One of things the media and goverment does.Is that they will put a person on this site.That will try there hardest to make you into a crazed nut person .Try to created you into something you are not .They don’t tell you you are wrong .What they do is act like a immature child and talk down to you.Make fun of you.Like professional character assians . I had this happen to me sometimes.But I think with these gun shootings.They will be more of them and more of this .You will see more people like this on sites like this. Trying to make people like me look stupid that dares to question these shootings. I think you will see more of these people .But what gives away for me.Is that they don’t tell you where you are wrong on what you sayed.It is when they try to make fun of you.Is to me when they are hired people to discredit you .Because that is the only thing they got going.They don’t want to hear the truth .I just think this .If I called a Conspiracy nut then so be it .

    • BeautifulAmerica

      Too long, but we getcha.

      • Jack

        Yes went to long on that one ,sorry about that. Just never seen such a scam like we just had .The video of people that are so fake pain and trying to make you think they really lost somebody.The media are not even seeing this. There just eating it up and sadley a lot of other people are to .

        • BeautifulAmerica

          Sadly, you are correct. Keep posting!

  • thomacx

    Seriously, this is the biggest garbage set of rebuttals I have ever seen. Maybe the writer should get a new job working with the current administration, wait, probably is already on the payroll.
    If it is all conspiracy, why try to re-tell the “truth”????

  • ihavetopickastupidname

    Not according to one of Obama’s crony media outlets:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oJkvB9goPAA#!

  • jen

    Everyone grieves in different ways…funny I have never seen a parent that just lost a child grieve by laughing…I have two boys whom I pass clothes down to…not while the older child is still able to wear them though…sorry those explanations are so pathetic. Its not a conspiracy theory just because we dont believe the garbage we are being fed. Try again

    • BeautifulAmerica

      I seriously doubt that I could bear to have my surviving daughter meet a (real) president wearing her dead sister’s clothes. It just cannot be true.

  • http://www.facebook.com/robert.andersonsr Robert Anderson Sr

    I totally believe that OBAMA STAGED this all !! I hope someone chacks all this out and finds out this is ALL FAKE !?

    • Winston Hibler

      Fake, just like Obama!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/George-Reichel/100000234315027 George Reichel

    Pitiful article.

  • Winston Hibler

    Golly whiskers, that sure convinced Me! Boy, liberals are just So Smart!

  • $7099023

    Even bank robbers don’t take 3 or four guns with them into a robbery. You can only shoot one at a time. obama’s mob wanted to cover all the gun bases by including all the common guns so he can take them all. He just can’t have us protecting ourselves against his tyranny.

  • Thom Raasio

    What TRULY LAME “comprehensive” responses to the AMAZING EVIDENCE that this is a FRAUD setup.

  • rascallyrabbit

    You are lying, no AR15 was used as per Coroner’s Report. People who report falsehood should go to jail, you are a blight on society and freedom.

    • madmemere

      rascally -No one is lying; the sound bytes and videos are there. The coroner and local law enforcement both gave news interviews with very “large” holes in the information they were spouting.

  • Ken Bass

    Not according to News Reports. The weapons used were at first 4 handguns then it was two handguns and according to news reports the AR was left in the trunk according to officers on scene. Video is out there to prove that report. So far as the other BS I don’t buy it for a minute. Ranks right up there with the 911 conspiracy nuts.With the current corrupt administration, If they had pictures of him holding an AR I wouldn’t believe it. There is video of the nutcase entering the school, but it will never be released because it, I feel, will not support the gun grabbing Obama’s version of what happened.

  • Lilac

    The Soto RIP page – opened on Dec 10th??

  • kennethwbaguley

    some have so much time on their hands that they critique and critique and twist and twist incidents because they want to demonstrate their intellectual prowess which ends up with these conspiracies which are proven false. Get a life.ll

    • JUST WOKE UP

      I really, really know that it is impossible to believe that our own government would perpetrate a “false flag” event to MANIPULATE US…OR EVEN ENTERTAIN the thought of something like this, but here it is in black and white declassified documents….THIS one didn’t occur, but HOW in the WORLD could OUR government EVEN CONSIDER something like this….THIS is the government you trust.
      Operation Northwoods was a false flag operation to MANIPULATE the public in order to justify war. BELIEVE IT! IT IS A DOCUMENTED plan by OUR GOVERNMENT TO CREATE “A WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION”. PRAISE GOD it was nixed by JFK, but the FACT is, IT WAS REAL…..IT IS UNBELIEVABLE THAT IT WAS EVEN PROPOSED….SO don’t tell me how wonderful and UNCORRUPTED our government is, how they would NEVER DO SOMETHING UNETHICAL TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION………….Here are some of the “points” the plan included:
      In part, the plan called for the following:
      1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
      2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.
      a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
      1. Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
      2. Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base.
      3. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
      4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[13]
      5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
      6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
      7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
      8. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
      9. Capture militia group which storms the base.
      10. Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—naphthalene.
      11. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).
      b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
      c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
      3. A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several forms:
      a. We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
      b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The United States could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by U.S. fighters to “evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crew. CASUALTY LISTS IN THE U.S NEWPAPERS WOULD CAUSE A HELPFUL WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION……SORT OF LIKE THE WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION OVER GUN CONTROL?
      MOCK FUNERALS…….I can ONLY imagine they would’ve had flag draped EMPTY coffins…..you know, to “CAUSE A HELPFUL WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION”…..my word but ppl can be sheep. :/ THAT’S why our country is in the shape it’s in…..it’s called normalcy bias….look it up.

      • kennethwbaguley

        You misinterpreted my response…I was responding to the phony claims listed in the article which were unfounded…So you know how I feel otherwise, I look at Obama and his administration as Domestic Enemies and feel they should be arrested, taken into custody by the Army of the United States of America and prosecuted for their crimes. Benghazi was as you are saying, planned and the plans backfired. I don’t want to go into any further discussion on this because it makes me sick…This is enough to allow you to make a better evaluation of what I had to say, which was response to the debunked charges in Sandy Hook…Ken —– Original Message —–
        From: Disqus
        To: [email protected]
        Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 5:58 PM
        Subject: [clashdaily] Re: Your comprehensive answer to every Sandy Hook conspiracy theory

        JUST WOKE UP wrote, in response to kennethwbaguley:

        I really, really know that it is impossible to believe that our own government would perpetrate a “false flag” event to MANIPULATE US…OR EVEN ENTERTAIN the thought of something like this, but here it is in black and white declassified documents….THIS one didn’t occur, but HOW in the WORLD could OUR government EVEN CONSIDER something like this….THIS is the government you trust. Operation Northwoods was a false flag operation to MANIPULATE the public in order to justify war. BELIEVE IT! IT IS A DOCUMENTED plan by OUR GOVERNMENT TO CREATE “A WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION”. PRAISE GOD it was nixed by JFK, but the FACT is, IT WAS REAL…..IT IS UNBELIEVABLE THAT IT WAS EVEN PROPOSED….SO don’t tell me how wonderful and UNCORRUPTED our government is, how they would NEVER DO SOMETHING UNETHICAL TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION………….Here are some of the “points” the plan included: In part, the plan called for the following:
        1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies. 2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces. a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order): 1. Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
        2. Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base. 3. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
        4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[13]
        5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
        6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
        7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations. 8. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City. 9. Capture militia group which storms the base.
        10. Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—naphthalene.
        11. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)). b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base. c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
        3. A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several forms: a. We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
        b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The United States could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by U.S. fighters to “evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crew. CASUALTY LISTS IN THE U.S NEWPAPERS WOULD CAUSE A HELPFUL WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION……SORT OF LIKE THE WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION OVER GUN CONTROL? MOCK FUNERALS…….I can ONLY imagine they would’ve had flag draped EMPTY coffins…..you know, to “CAUSE A HELPFUL WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION”…..my word but ppl can be sheep. :/ THAT’S why our country is in the shape it’s in…..it’s called normalcy bias….look it up.
        Link to comment

  • VeraSt

    typical prog disinfo — our tax dollars are paying salary of gov’t spokesmouth who cobbled together this pathetic attempt at argumentation — the excellent rebuttals to gov’t disinfo (in comments section) make this webpage useful — otherwise, it’s digital fishwrap

  • laura91

    Well, what about the press release of Gov Mallory, who admits that they were FORWARNED of this event coming. hmmm. doesn’t sound so much like a theory anymore does it!

  • Pete

    Sorry, these answers are LAME!

    • madmemere

      Pete -Do “you” have something to offer??

      • Pete

        Well I am pretty sure everything was covered by other posters above,
        however, regarding the comments about How people react… I watched this
        event unfold from the beginning and I watched the Columbine Shooting
        unfold from the beginning. There is no comparison. There were videos of
        hundreds of kids leaving the school, all were in tears. Friends and
        family of killed students were all in tears, you didn’t have to search a
        face to try and find a tear, they were gushing down everyone’s face. I
        have yet to see any Sandy Hook parent with a real tear on their cheek.

        Where are all the kids (600) evacuating Sandy Hook? Where are all the teachers?

        The
        car was registered to Chris Rodi, the license plate is read off the car
        on the flatbed, the letters and numbers are read as they are seen on
        the plate. Oh did someone switch the plate? The car was obviousl moved
        to another staging area, as one video showed by examining the fire line
        and no parking letters. The cop handling the weapon in the trunk was not
        wearing gloves.

        A suspect that was apprehended was put in the front seat of a police vehicle, like that is common police procedure!

        Where
        is the CT State police, with a final report of the events? The killer
        is dead, his mother is dead, the children are all dead, what takes so
        long for an investigation to be completed?

        I am tired of posting
        this information. Our government is replete with scandals, cover-ups,
        and underhanded dealing and PEOPLE ARE SICK TO DEATH OF IT! For every
        cover-up exposed, there are dozen that go unnoticed.

  • wdcraftr

    So, he brought 3-4 guns in the school, but we must ban AR15′s.. Maybe if we arm citizens with full automatics we would have stopped him. Tell the dead children that your solution is to ban a gun not even used, and that would have saved their lives… Banning my neighbors AR, isn’t going to keep me from shooting, knifing, beating you with a baseball bat, running you over with my car, blowing you up, if I want to. Of course Only crazies and Liberals do that, not us armed honest citizens who’s guns haven’t shot anybody for over 200 years now..

  • StardustLu

    This situation is frighteningly serious. PLEASE, in these hoaxes, check the evidence. Being outraged by folks who see problems with the picture presented is immature. We must save our country! I was upset too, until I sat back and wondered where the 700 kids were. Then the non-puffy faces of the actors. The .223 bullets all over everywhere. Please don’t be so outraged. Check the evidence!

  • JUST WOKE UP

    I really, really know that it is impossible to believe that our own government would perpetrate a “false flag” event to MANIPULATE US…OR EVEN ENTERTAIN the thought of something like this, but here it is in black and white declassified documents….THIS one didn’t occur, but HOW in the WORLD could OUR government EVEN CONSIDER something like this….THIS is the government you trust.
    Operation Northwoods was a false flag operation to MANIPULATE the public in order to justify war. BELIEVE IT! IT IS A DOCUMENTED plan by OUR GOVERNMENT TO CREATE “A WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION”. PRAISE GOD it was nixed by JFK, but the FACT is, IT WAS REAL…..IT IS UNBELIEVABLE THAT IT WAS EVEN PROPOSED….SO don’t tell me how wonderful and UNCORRUPTED our government is, how they would NEVER DO SOMETHING UNETHICAL TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION………….Here are some of the “points” the plan included:
    In part, the plan called for the following:
    1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
    2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.
    a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
    1. Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
    2. Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base.
    3. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
    4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[13]
    5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
    6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
    7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
    8. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
    9. Capture militia group which storms the base.
    10. Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—naphthalene.
    11. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).
    b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
    c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
    3. A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several forms:
    a. We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
    b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The United States could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by U.S. fighters to “evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crew. CASUALTY LISTS IN THE U.S NEWPAPERS WOULD CAUSE A HELPFUL WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION……SORT OF LIKE THE WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION OVER GUN CONTROL?
    MOCK FUNERALS…….I can ONLY imagine they would’ve had flag draped EMPTY coffins…..you know, to “CAUSE A HELPFUL WAVE OF NATIONAL INDIGNATION”…..my word but ppl can be sheep. :/ THAT’S why our country is in the shape it’s in…..it’s called normalcy bias….look it up.

    • madmemere

      Just Woke Up -Factually, we haven’t been able to “trust” our government, since 1871; research “The Organic Act of 1871. Yes, indeed, our own government does perpetuate “false flags” to manipulate US! Have you ever done much research on the “false flag events” that took place during the “clintonista dual presidency”? If not, you should; just a side note, Eric Holder was asst. AG to Reno, during that reign of terror! One of the lesser known events was the murder of Ken Trentadue, in his cell, while being held in “protective federal custody”. That was Aug. 1995, just 4 months after the bombing of the Murrah Federal Bldg. in Oklahoma City. Try doing some research on his name.

      Right now, we have to be more concerned with the criminal regime, that currently inhabits OUR White House! Numerous “strange events” began to occur, very shortly after the impostor appeared on the political scene (2006-2007). And since Fast and Furious, strange events and general chaos have increased in tempo and occurrence; the past year for example, the Aurora theater shooting, the Benghazi terror attack (orchestrated by obama-soetoro, attested to by an administration insider), the Sandy Hook massacre. Go over these incidents and compare the similarities, coincidences, parallels, etc. If I go into all of them, the post will be much too long. The lamestream media propaganda machine is complicit, they only publish what the White House tells them to. In the above note “administration insider”- -that was an interview by Doug Hagmann, of Canada Free Press.

      The media AND the “regime” neglected to tell anyone about the second attack on Camp Bastian (Afghanistan), on 9/14 – -3 days after Benghazi. Marines died that day, but no one said a word; their bodies were, quietly, returned home- -no national media coverage, no White House welcome committee?? Why the silence? They were still too busy trying to cover their butts with Benghazi fabrications! Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin and dancingczars websites, each carried that report.
      Many years ago, FDR said “In politics, there are no accidents. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way!”

  • Al Chirico

    I can’t believe that you perpetulated the same myth as the progessive liberal media. The Bushmaster AR-15 is not, I repeat, an ” assault rifle”. Please don’t fall into that trap. The Bushmaster is a semi-auto .223 rifle. Assault rifles are capable of selectable automatic fire. The Bushmaster is not. While it may have the appearance of an M-16, it is functionally no different from any other semi-automatic rifle that fires the .223 cartridge.

  • The Old Man

    Maybe I really am over the hill as I would have never questioned it but now it is something to ponder. Also, it seems amazing that 2 of the most famous owners of gun manufacturing companies suddenly died under mysterious circumstances within the last 2 weeks.
    Apparently, they will stop at nothing to get what they want.

  • MontieR

    Too many inconsistencies, to many OFFICIAL stories, Too many similarities to other mass killings by people on psychotropic drugs, too many eye witnesses stating there was more than one person. We are being LIED to.

  • rennyangel2

    There is a Sandy Hook School Support Fund created by United Way, but I cannot tell from the site when it was originally posted. Many funds on Google have similar sites with Dec. 14 and 15 and 16 attached to them, so I do not know how you get into the URL for United Way to find Dec. 11.

  • sha44ss

    I’m sorry…I am a mother and grandmother and if one of my kids or grandkids had been massacred like that I would be screaming crying for days and probably have a stroke so they would have had to have me sedated and in the hospital. My husband would have been taken to jail for going in after our family…they would have had to put a bullet in him to keep him away…. the Grief Scale would have been OVER THE TOP- CHAOS would be with the famillies! Nothing adds up!!

    • TaskForce16

      You are projecting what you believe would be YOUR reactions onto all other parents. Not everyone will react in the same manner. I think you fail to recognize how extremely surreal such an event would be for most people. I suspect that one of the first thoughts that would go through many parents minds is, “This isn’t happening, this is not real.” Some may even tell themselves, “I’m going to wake up in a minute and this will all just be a bad dream.”
      Not to be insulting to you, but you really don’t know for sure how you or your husband would react, initially, in a similar scenario. I have no doubt you would go through a nasty rollercoaster of emotions.

      • Sandra Dee

        If that were true, they would exhibit shock–not laughter. You obviously have never lost someone close to you. EVERYONE acts the same–they are in shock, they are confused and LOOK LIKE that, not the way these people looked. The only way they would look like that is if they knew about it before hand. This is a fraud!

  • applepie

    SO bottom line is people need to keep their eye on the ball, and no conspiracy stuff. Stick with the proven facts. #1 our constitution is under attack.

  • Clancy D.. McKenzie, MD

    This is a phony report utilizing weak statements of some conspiracy theorists but omitting the meat of what is known, I saw videos of persons being chased through the woods, at least two apprehended by police, one of whom is said to have four assault weapons. I also heard the police radio conversations. If this is a ligitimate critique on your part and not just a matter of being complicit with the leftist newsmedia’s non-reporting of these findings, then certainly you would have tried to address some of these findings at the scene of the crime — and you might also have addressed the issue as to why the newsmedia did not mention these things. It appears that your sole purpose was to make the so-called conspiracy “theorists” look like lunatic fringe.

    I am a psychiatrist and I understand the rage of the psychotic killer. I profiled the DC sniper on Fox News with Bill O’Reily, and identified correctly in advance aspects of his infancy.

    Rage is proportionate to helplessness and no one is as helpless as a baby when the mother is not there. I have reason to believe the separation trauma in Adam ocurred between 8 and 9 months of age, the age of stranger anxiety. With rejection or separation in the present, the infant rage can be reactivated years or decades later. Feelings are far more intense than thoughts, so long after the memories have disappeared, the rage can be activated.

    When this infant rage is activated, it is directed out to the whole world (because to the infant the mother is the whole world). In this case it was directed toward 6 and 7 year old children — whom he did not know, and aparently it was limited mostly to one class room.

    I can understand a crazed killer shooting everyone in the classroom. That translates into killing everyone. What does not compute is the fact that each child was shot two more times in the head. Here there is a different purpose. That is a military means of making certain there are no witnesses. If it were Adam who wanted to make certain there were no witnesses as to what he did, why would he then shoot himself in the head? This would only convince everyone that he did it. So it does not make sense that he would have shot each child two more times in the head.

    So it appears that you are complicit in covering up the important elements that need to be addressed and explored. What for???? Have you no comments about the other suspects, especially the one with assault weapons fleeing the scene of the crime???

    Is this just a continuation of the Banning of one million M-1 assault weapons more than a year ago? (That’s the gun that freed Europe during the war.) Then came the ordering of 450 million high penetration hollow-point bullets for Homeland Security, followed by the attempt to bypass the second amendment by putting us under UN gun control, written by Iran. Next there was 750 million more bullets for HLS — and now there are 1.6 billion.

    As we race toward socialism, we should be aware that 200 million citizens of socialistic countries around the world were murdered by their own governments in the last 100 years. Lenin murdered 60 million of his people and Mao Tse Tung murdered about 100 million of his people.

    Homeland Security — which doesn’t care about our borders — now has enough ammunition to murder 200 million Americans eight times over.

    While I personally would never own an assault weapon, The above is a reason why our citizens need to have them, and it is the reason this was written into our Constitution — to protect us from a government that has no regard for the constitution, and a government that might wish to take away our rights and control everything we do.

    • madmemere

      You’re a psychiatrist, congratulations! You have your work cut out for you; it’s referred to as “job security”! You asked “why the news media did not mention these things”? Do you understand “how” the “lamestream media propaganda machine works”? Let me answer that for you- -they only print, or publish whatever the current “regime” tells them to. Now, perhaps, you can tell the rest of US how we go about changing that!

    • Tim_the_Bald

      Brilliant. Thank you.

    • Sandra Dee

      It’s called MK Ultra–mind controlled slaves. Look it up on You Tube. Plenty of evidence explaining what that does to individuals who then have specific targets and missions to carry out, without ever knowing what they did or were involved in.

  • Richard K Harter

    Then there is the pesky little fact that they still had 3 daughters same number as before the shooting when the Pres. show up for the Photo op.

  • randellmd

    the youtube theories are no better or worse than the the conspiracies the main slime media pushed and are pushing now to grab your guns. if the death of children was such an issue why hasn’t obozo shed his crocodile tears for all those who die in his “hometown” of chicago? Because the fact that chicago has the gun bans already and they know that is the cause of all the gun violence but the msm hides it.

  • Tim

    I suppose if you walk around with your head up your ass and drink the kool aid you will think this wild explanation to be plausible.

  • Sandidad

    The latest information from NBC- There were 4 hand guns found in the school and a Bushmaster rifle found in the back seat of a car. During one of the news reports I actually witnessed a Bushmaster in the back seat of a car.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqpjJ6P-NSQ&feature=youtu.be

  • fred

    nbc news says mom had 5 guns registered 2 handguns 1 henry 1 enfield and 1 shotgun where did the bushmaster ar-15 come from? maybe fast and furious?

  • madmemere

    Many people, suffering from grief, are often sedated; the side effects vary widely, on each individual. Many years ago, my husband’s great aunt was so overwhelmed, at the graveside, she laughed hysterically, then threw up on her husband’s coffin before collapsing beside it! Irregardless, her grief was very real.
    Sadly, a lot of other sick people have taken to adding insult to injury, with anonymous phone calls, emails and the like, to friends and families of the (real) Sand Hook victims, accusing them of being “paid actors”!! How ungodly cruel can people be? Makes me “wonder” if these vicious hyenas might be “connected to the actual perpetrators” attempting to divert suspicion from themselves? That is the way liberal/progressive/commies do things, you know.
    If there is any conspiracy here (and in a number of other instances), it IS a conspiracy orchestrated by the criminal regime squatting in OUR White House! Have none of you tried to “connect the dots” yet? All the “weird” traumas and dramas that have taken place, since the impostor first appeared on the political scene (2006 or 2007)??

    And starting with Fast & Furious, right on through the Aurora theater shooting, the Benghazi terror attack and Sandy Hook; do you not pick up, nor recognize the parallels, similarities and coincidences that are so prevalent? I can’t go into all of them in one post, but do some research on news and police radio sound bytes, witness statements; the fathers of the two latest “alleged shooters” financial connections and on and on! Two young (20 somethings) “alleged shooters”, under psychiatric care and psychotropic (mind control)drugs!!
    Everyone is well aware of this “regime’s” great desire to disarm the American public; what despot, or dictator does not (for their “own” protection)? And the lessons of history, if you remember them, would tell you exactly “why”; start with Russia, back in, what, 1917 or 1919?? Follow that right on through Germany, Red China, Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, et. al. – -all citizen’s weapons confiscated by government, just prior to the genocide of millions!! Think it couldn’t happen here? Think again!
    Many years ago, FDR said “In politics, there are no accidents. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way!”

    • tommyjeferson

      You make I sound argument. However, try looking up the word, “irregardless” and you will find it doesn’t exist. In fact, you will find that it is grammatically incorrect; it is a double negative. Usually when people use “irregardless” they are attempting to sound intelligent.

      • tommyjefferson

        * a, not I. My mistake.

        • madmemere

          It’s ok- -when I get really, really agitated, my fingers just take over!

      • madmemere

        tommy -Are you more concerned with what’s actually going on in our nation, today, or in “correcting” my grammatical ineptitude? My spastic fingers wouldn’t let me get away with “regardless”!

        • TommyJefferson

          You missed my whole point. I said you make a sound argument, i.e., I agree with you. I thought if you were intelligent enough, you would have gotten that. Issues of liberty are very important. Perhaps not as important of correct grammar; however, poor education is also the downfall of a nation. Just saying.

          • Sandra Dee

            Absolutely right! I am also tired of the wrong words being used–definitions of those words being changed or used simply wrongly. Let me add I few more: It isn’t: “I seen”–it’s “I saw”. I can’t tell you how nauseated I feel when I continually hear people say “I seen”. Its sickening. Another one: “anyways”–it’s “anyway”.

            Even though some don’t get it, Tommy, I and many others do. In the next generations, they will only be able to communicate with grunts and squeaks.

      • Lumpy Rutherford

        Thank you, Miss Manners…

    • Sandra Dee

      “How ungodly cruel can people be? Makes me “wonder” if these vicious
      hyenas might be “connected to the actual perpetrators” attempting to
      divert suspicion from themselves? That is the way
      liberal/progressive/commies do things, you know.”

      There you go! That’s the response this article was supposed to elicit. Too bad you were one of only a few that took the bait. Good job! You are very easily programmed. Luckily, many of us are not.

      • madmemere

        Connect your own dots; that doesn’t require any “programming”- -just some research! “Luckily, many of us are not” – -sadly, you’re not intuitive enough to do the research on your own; you just swallow whatever the “lamestream media propaganda machine” feeds you and then, try to spread it as reality!

  • < me <

    The source of information for this news post came from Roger Hedgecock’s 1/17/13 radio show. Here’s the link. Fast forward to 21:13 for Roger’s comments.

    The five worst mass killings, where a firearm was used, have a common thread. Hint #1: They didn’t belong to the NRA. They don’t fit the stereotype of the “red-neck” gun owner.

    Check it out …

    Ft Hood: Registered Democrat/Muslim.
    Columbine: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.
    Virginia Tech: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff; Registered Democrat.
    Colorado Theater: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.
    Connecticut School Shooter: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.

    Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.

    Also, of the worst killings in the last several decades, only one was a female, all the rest were boys, barely men, and none of them had a strong male father or role model in the household. Their role models were rappers, action movies, comics and violent video games.
    Our problem isn’t weapons, it’s boys without boundaries. Who live in ‘progressive’ households.

  • terry thompson

    This article by no way answers all questions.

  • terry thompson

    The shooters were liberal obama worshipers. No proof, just thought I would write it.

  • Can’tTrustEm

    This whole cover up is reminding me of the 9-11 cover up!!! We can not trust our government. When are people going to wake up!!

  • Paulita Selene

    Why was there a magazine clip attached to the shotgun? Also he did a side bolt release to check for bullets. You can see the officer jacking the bolt.. The damn video isn’t that blurry!! Who wrote this piece of junk? They ought to be ashamed and name some damn sources besides their delusional brains!!

    • Lumpy Rutherford

      Kate, I didn’t see the shotgun photo to which you’ve referred, but there are shotguns that accept detachable magazines, and even drums. The only one I can think of that I’ve personally seen is a Kalashnikov-type, but I’ve seen conversion kits for Mossberg and other pump shotguns that enable them to accept such magazines…

  • Joe

    As far back as the 1960s we used .223 caliber rifles as deer rifles. The ammo was cheaper than the 30-30 and 30.06 It was a commercially available hunters rifle. The .223 does not have the stopping power of bigger caliber weapons like the .45 pistol or the AK-47, for example.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gail-Steelhammer-Cohen/1313002671 Gail Steelhammer-Cohen

    I saw the so-called “conspiracy” videos – they raised valid questions – but I wonder how a whole school (all teachers,parents,kids) could be in on one – but knowing who is in charge now and “Fast and Furious” was a stunt – I am really upset and scared because I would not put it past this administration..regarding the father and his “grief” I thought his laughter and then “sudden” change to “grief” was more than coping – it was bizarre in that it looked like he was an actor – too many questions and not enough people bold enough to investigate

  • nunya

    How soon did this take place in regards to the shooting at the theater in Colorado? Seems like the “powers that be” couldn’t just let one heinous act go unmolested. Had to deliver the ‘ole “one-two” punch to crown their “gun-grab”. Just like everything concerning this regime, it will be stuffed away somewhere and the real truth will never come to light. Conspiracy or not, this whole thing stinks to high Heaven! If it has anything to do with Obama…you know it is pure garbage!

  • Lumpy Rutherford

    If I’m not mistaken, Salon is one of those websites that assures us that Obama’s birth certificate as posted at Whitehouse.gov is genuine. I’m no document expert, but when I downloaded it and blew it up in Photoshop, the modifications (cutting and pasting, mixed typefaces, etc) were quite obvious. So was the smiley-face drawn in on the signature of the registrar. In 1961, “African” was not a race, and would not have been entered as such on any official document. Guess I’ll just keep an open mind about the Sandy Hook tragedy until someone with greater credibility than Salon comes along to debunk everything…

  • Baron von smackover

    staged,staged,staged. No proof, just confusion, just idiots reporting, just twin sisters, no guns? Just bushmasters, no bodies, just florida actors, something about a mock school disaster not far away for training purposes, too many people laughing about this “tragedy” I would believe in a conspiracy until investigation prooved otherwise.

  • Sgt. York

    Awww come on now you really think O’Vomit and the far left Liberal would use a pre programed incident to promote gun control in America just to take over the country in order to keep him in command for life? If so You may be oh so correct

    • Sandra Dee

      Why not? Bush, et al staged the biggest one to bring in the Patriot Act. Why do you people continue to buy into the left/right b. s. ONE MORE TIME: BOTH SIDES ARE THE SAME. Until you get this, you are still being programmed. Wake up!

  • oldgringo

    How do we know a Bushmaster was used or found at the scene of the Sandyhook shooting….I have read no police reports stating what actually was found….Only reports from our left wing news media….And I don’t trust anything they report….They are known to promote the lies and fallacy’s of the masters of trickery!….Where’s the photo’s?

  • Pete

    This shooting did not deliver the result they were seeking. There will be another staged shooting soon, The perpetrators will be labled Tea Party Patriots. Watch and see!

  • JohnC

    there is also a pesky fact that they now say they found 4 not 2 hand guns. which is it 4 or 2 something else not adding up. why is it necessary to change the story so many times. Is it to fit the administrations agenda

  • Insighting Truth

    The important thing to note in this article that claims to address anomalous reportage from Sandy Hook is that the author addresses nothing. He sites the items that conspiracy theorists say conflict with the official narrative then states his opinion regarding each item. He does not present a single countermanding fact. He provides no evidence of anything whatsoever.

  • JohnC

    What if the whole Sandy Hook shooting was a staged for media event. Fact that there was supposedly training going on practicing for this exact scenario only 20 minutes from where the alleged incident occurred on the same road. why would ambulances be parked so far away from the doors and the roads blocked by cars (not easy for ambulances to get in or out helping the wounded) And in the media clips I saw No Children anywhere. Maybe this was a video from the practice training a short distance a way and we are being told this was the scene …could the whole thing have been staged to allow for the grabbing of our guns and an attack on the second amendment.

  • 4772020

    look at the clip of the cops taking the “AR” out of the trunk!! he clears the firearm by pulling the charging handle ” the bolt” back from the side ;;;; the “AR” charging hand;e is at the rear og the fire arm;;;; and look at the size and shape of the rounds being ejected ;;;;; there not “222″ rounds ;;;; shot gun maybe??

  • rnj@

    Where’s the man who was seen in the parking lot in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camo pants? He was heard to say “I didn’t do it”! He had a van or suv with the back window blown out. He has disappeared! Is he back at his job with the secret service in DC?

    • ohcomeonnow

      Isn’t it funny that the news reporter has just been told that one of the perps may be sitting in the police car “just over there” yet he never has his camera man pan over to get a picture? Really? Are you kidding me? Don’t reporters live and die for shots of the actual perps? Total cover up. Probably fake news reporters. If not, they should be fired because they are a bumbling idiot.

  • Patriot50

    They DID NOT find an AR-15 in the school!

  • HongryHawg

    This is setting the record straight? I normally don’t succumb to “conspiracy theories” but there is a lot of damning suggestion to back this one. And Salon thinks it can squelch it with a few words. Salon has a problem with credibility anyway. They are not presenting facts here, just sculptured opinion. And the fact that they are making the effort to debunk makes it even more suspicious. Example: What father with a 6 year old in a school turn and run away when he hears gunshots being fire at that school. Example; I saw the video of Parker and that was very bad acting. I could go on but I’ll stop at Slate attempt to be the authority on the guns. Why does Slate know something no one else does? Because they are making it up to deflect. Why?

  • seektruth

    This is missing the point on some issues. For example, it wasn’t what gun was used it was the REPORTING of what guns were used. How did the news get it wrong if not from the officials that were investigating? Identifying guns and bullet holes is rather easy and at one point it was reported that ALL shots came from 4 handguns. How the hell does that get reported?
    But here’s a BIG ONE: Crisis Management Institute issued a guide called “Talking with your Children/Students about the Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting” and it was dated December 10th!!! It was also posted and had been cached by Google to Arlington Local School District in Ohio on that same date. It has since been removed but the cache can still be found.

  • Disgusted!

    You know with Travon Martin, Fast & Furious, and the stolen election I do think this administration would set this all up on purpose so they can pull at heart strings and say all this gun control really is necessary! Crazy? Not as crazy as posting a fake birth certificate on the WH website and all the other crazy things we let them get away with now is it? Bette wake up because our government are a bunch of scamming con artists and I guarentee it! If they don’t get their way, time will show a new massacre!

  • Gerald Mann

    Obamas crew is doing anything they can to disarm Americans , that tell me that they are very afraid of doing something they have planned . They know America is not going to stand for much more of this nonsence they are making the media feed up . Now they have a sheriff injured at a gun show in Georga !! I don’t know about you but I have never been to a gun show where anyone loaded a weapon , let alone shoot one, in fact they usually have the ammo on a completely diffrent table ..I personally was hoping they were going to impeach Obama instead of inagurateing him for the TREASONOUS acts by him concerning Benguazi and him letting several Americans die to cover up Obama’s selling or giving guns to the Muslem Brotherhood…Thats right Obama screws up and loyal Americans die !!

  • http://www.facebook.com/ValleyImagna F Gregg Meagher

    You have certainly missed out on a LOT to include the official release of the weapons found in the school and the police statements that the weapon you mention was in fact in the car. In brief, following substantiated documentation and analysis, it would be better you try debunking Mickey Mouse :-(

  • HongryHawg

    Provided the facts? The only fact is that Slate has no facts. The “theorists” supply plenty of facts; televised and otherwise. Slate just says, “That’s not true.” That’s all they say. Their article does not put forth one single fact, other than the fact of their attempt at a rebuttal makes it all the more suspicious.

  • Melia Sese

    Of course, these do not seem like any theories I have heard about (because they were concocted by lefty media wags like those at Slate). For instance, what about the fact that we cannot find very much info about Lanza … or his mother Nancy?

    Nancy Champion Lanza (full name) is a CIA asset working for DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and the shootings by her son were a DARPA “experiment” overseen by her. The weapons are said to be standard CIA issue (perhaps some of the more astute people on this board can confirm that?) Nancy was apparently relocated to Connecticut where she would work on DARPA projects at the US Naval Submarine Base in Groton, CT. She was reportedly working on video-game simulation of submarine warfare. CIA agent Amir Mirza Hekmati (recently arrested in Iran) claimed that video games are used as weapons of psychological warfare to justify US military actions.
    Based on these revelations, we cannot say for sure that Adam Lanza’s actions were CIA ordered but they seem to satisfy the agenda of some in this country who desire a disarming of the population – for whatever purpose …

  • e111w

    Early reporting post massacre told of an individual found behind(?) the school in the (woods?). Don’t rercall hearing about that report again. Any further light to be shed on that?

  • PolitiJim

    It’s time to unsubscribe from ClashDaily when they pass on
    clear disinformation. Unfortunately Giles is so busy trying to
    get traffic, he doesnt do any of his own research. Here he exhibits the brainless follower that so many (wrongly) have accused him of previously. It is a disgusting thought to think that the lives of these children and adults mean so little to Giles that they are not afforded a serious investigation.

    And no. Father’s who lose their children less than 24 hours previously do NOT laugh freely stepping up to the podium, take an index card and ask if they should just “read the speech” and then fake being upset within a matter of 10 seconds. I’m truly offended you represent yourself as a Christian.

    Serious minded people of intelligence however can begin with the analysis by a CT cop
    (here http://spotlightoncorruption.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/connecticut-cop-exposes-sandy-hook-contradictions-inconsistencies-gun-grab-agenda/)
    or a life long military investigator (here
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SK8tLX6VQp4#!)
    who go through every item of information. Among the things that are
    not explained by people actually PROFESSIONALLY investigating this are:

    - Immediate contradictory reports from actual law enforcement.

    -
    Recreation of timelines that make it impossible for an untrained, 120lb
    mentally disturbed teen to accurately discharge more ammunition than a
    trained solider could carry or utilize.)

    - background checks on the Lanza’s, and more importantly, many of the families/professionals who were pushed by the media.

    - a complete lack of video/photo corroboration that was available at Columbine and the Brazilian school shooting.

    - NO 9-11 calls from neighbors although supposedly shots could be heard outside the school.

    -
    No plausible explanation how a military dressed teen could be “buzzed
    into” the school when not only did Mrs. Lanza NOT work at the school –
    but no eyewitnesses have seen a “smashed in window” which still wouldn’t
    have gotten him admittance.

    Frankly, it takes more faith to believe the media spin than it does even a cursory view of the facts.

  • Dustin B.

    You have got to be f’n kidding me. You in no way addressed every detail, and the one’s you did, you f’d up on. You know for one that it was reported NOW that he brought 4 handguns into the school…not an AR style rifle and yes that was a shotgun they pulled out. So answer this question first. Why would the media immediately report that the main weapon used was the Bushmaster AR and then have it corroborated by the medical examiner if they later report that no rifle was used. Hmmmm….You guys are no better than the other media facets with your lack of research and disinformation.

  • Frdmftr

    MSNBC reported in a later update that the AR-15 was found in the trunk of the car and four handguns were recovered from inside the school. And this article does not address the two guys in camo that an officer challenged and reported on the police radio having them “proned out” on the ground, and then officers also arrested a guy in camo up behind the school in the woods. These guys were taken in handcuffs past witnesses who reported one of this said “I didn’t do it,” whereupon they disappeared, never to be mentioned, seen, or heard from again.

  • CaptTurbo

    Totally a false flag event.

  • http://Bravemind.blogspot.com Greg Bowman

    Doug, The slate article makes a good start. Yes. there are more assertions to deal with. However, notice that none of the passionate purvayers of “contrary truth”. acknowledge that 4 major points were exposed as false. They just move on to other points as if nothing happened.

  • tralphaz

    Thing I’m curious about was what guns were used, coroner said all were shot with the long rifle, yet, there is a Youtube video still available that shows a NBC newscaster state that there were 4 handguns found in the school, the AR-15 he says was still in the car, this can be seen at approx. 4:15 of the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhqjnxKOTSc

  • AL

    WHATABOUT THE MAN ON FILM CAUGHT IN THE WOODS, OR THE POLICE DISPACH RADIO CALLS OF TWO MEN PRONE OUT ON THE ROSD AFTER LEAVING THE SCENE , THESE ARE THE BIGGEST POINTS OF CONTENTION NOT THE TRIVIAL NON-SENSE “DEBUNKED HERE , NICE TRY THO

  • Isaac Pentlin

    The murders happened ; but adam lanza was not alone. some else involved. and he shot laza and fled, never to be found..He went back to his Homeland security buddies..The person who hid under the desk seen boots but, she could not see his face.. Who can verify it was adam lanza who did the shooting..

  • Brabado

    Does anyone in our once Great Country really trust the Governement, any more?
    Really?

  • Zephyr

    I’m a (mostly) liberal Democrat. I’m pro-gun control. Yet today I re-watched CNN footage presented as a live shot of SWAT/law enforcement storming Sandy Hook elementary – and it absolutely was not Sandy Hook elementary they were storming, but St. Rose de Lima school. What am I supposed to say now to my pro-gun colleagues? I have no answer.

  • DAY

    Funny thing though, even the media at first said the gun taken from the car trunk was the AR-15,,, why are you not mentioning that?? What about the nurse? the news media even said the mother was a teacher there,,, there were reports of other shooters, or others in camo caught by the police,,, Too much being covered up here… how could the media have gotten it so wrong so fast? They saw other people in the woods saying “I did not do it”…

  • ixnay00

    youtube jouce riley sandyhook

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_C5ZHCQLKIVQPLQVJZHPGZXW4OI Robert Osborn

    Doug, I have to admit that usually I like your opinion on many issues especially concerning guns, but this time you might be a little off base calling people Conspiracy Theorists just because they offer a different opinion then you do on some issues. Labeling people Conspiracy Theorists like you did by calling the Natural News Website or Info Wars website editors removes from your credibility and makes you appear to be just like the so-called Lame Stream Media which I don’t believe you want to be associated with.

    Just because somebody has a website, and offers an opposing viewpoint of events does not make them Conspiracy Theorists no more than you agreeing with the Main Stream Media all of the time thinking that they accurately report the news which of course everybody knows they don’t. They only report what they believe will bring their ratings up this is a fact that I believe you are aware of.

  • ohcomeonnow

    What about the Yacht Hoax last summer. The one where 20 something people were supposed to have been killed/drowned off the SANDY HOOK NJ coastline? Google it. Is it just me or is something very strange going on here?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/WJR6CRU3MK26B7HNEQYEV7R7IA Get Real

    This explains nothing about what happened there or who all is involved or what and why they are covering it up!
    What’s the real story ?
    The Slate story is a useless blotch of words why post this crap on your blog?

  • No name

    I’m not a conspiracy theorist but I will tell you I’ve looked into “strange” things about Sandy Hook and the more I saw the more I bapecame convinced it was a hoax. I’ve seen people try to address some of the anomalies but there are so many it’s ridiculous and you really haven’t touched on any of them here. Way too many websites up well in advance of the incident, Emilie Parker’s photos were all photo shopped. There are numerous videos on YouTube with forensics experts addressing things. You’ve really missed all the pertinent evidence not to mention that the Greenberg family constantly shows up in all of the massacres – Aurora, Tucson and now Sandy Hook. Sorry but I’m just not buying it. The more I look I to it the more fake it looks.

  • Iron15

    If you look real careful, its not a shotgun in the car, the cop pulls the charging handle back its an AR. (period)

  • Iron15

    Another Government shill website…

  • buster

    when you start out all condescending as to how these people are skewing facts, it may be a good idea for you to get your facts straight first. no assault rifle was used at sandy hook, rather four hand guns were. try to keep up. now that they admit no assault rifle was used, explain away the interview with the coroner who examined seven of them and pulled riffle bullets out of them. four hand guns http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/30208-nbc-admits-no-assault-rifle-used-in-newtown-shooting/

  • Sandra Dee

    LOL! You haven’t produced any evidence of anything to dispute the so called “conspiracy “theorists”–in fact, all you have managed to do is to exhibit that you must be one of those employed to make people who question fraudulent events, look ridiculous.

    One reason why there is not the buzz around this story as even around the Colorado shooting is #! THE PARENTS!!!!!!!! No, everyone does NOT react differently to a tragic events. There are actually several KNOWN steps in grief and the first is SHOCK! Tell me which one of these parents looked shocked or even sad. Are you seriously trying to convince someone (not anyone with a brain surely) that any of these people had just experienced a tragedy. NONE of them!

    So go on and keep trying to make people with common sense and a brain look bad, but again all you’re really doing to siding with the criminals who pulled this off. Good job!!!

  • bbarnicle

    In the Rep. Giffords shooting, 2 different network news shows reported witnesses that saw the shooter being dropped off by a driver in a pickup truck. I saw one of the reports myself – now they’re gone.
    At Sandy Hook, at least one reporter had a witness that saw Adam being dropped off in the purple van (the van that was seen by several witnesses leaving the scene w/the shot out back window).
    In the Webster shooting (firemen sot by a bushmaster), someone looked up Spengler’s arrest and prison records. He was only in for burglary, not for killing his grandmother w/a hammer, and also was not supposed to be released til Feb. ’13.

  • Sandy Pfaff

    Why was there a FEMA planned event for that area that day related to what would happen if there was a terrorist activity involving children? Hmmmmmm

  • Sandy Pfaff

    Why are the characters being shown all members of actors guild? Why is there only one reel shown of one line of children the same one over and over…where were the ambulance and fire trucks….why is it the only thing being taken out on a stretcher is some kind of silver container? What was the thing about the bus driver dropping kids off on the middle of the road? It WAS a hoax…the government does this more than people know…who trusts OBama….raise your hand…..

  • Alan

    Latest report says long gun was NOT in the school- so why did the ME say that all the wounds were caused by it ?

  • thisispropaganda

    Some of this is still false the weapon pulled out of the trunk was not a shotgun. The way the officer was checking the chamber is unlike the way you would a shotgun

  • Tim

    Yes, why was there a facebook page dedicated to the memory of Victoria Soto put up days BEFORE she was killed? And why the Sandy Hook memorial fund that was set up days BEFORE it actually happened? This touches on three peices, there are so many more. And, if you look at the family picture of Emilie, her sisters are much smaller than she is and do not bear that close of a resemblance.

  • halfbreed

    So have we been set-up? This is an Odd news article to come out several weeks later!
    http://www.teaparty.org/obama-asks-military-leaders-if-they-will-fire-on-us-citizens-19039/

  • smarterthanu

    thats not even half

  • RG

    the first reports from the police was the gun taken from the car was the bushmaster .223 rifle and only 2 hand guns were found beside the body of Lanza when he was found inside the school during the first reports by police when they arrived on scene. Nothing was mentioned about a shotgun on the premises…Now they say the bushmaster .223 and 2 hand guns were found beside Lanza and a shotgun was pulled from the car..they need to get their stories straight before they start saying things on TV that makes everything change from what was first said about what had happened…

  • Bather

    Actually there were only 4 handguns found in the school. The AR-15 was, left in the car. It was reported on the news. Then never spoken of again.

  • Austin

    You do realize this article really didn’t hit on any point anyone is actually arguing. I was expecting some explanation for the others who were arrested on scene but never resurfaced. I thought, maybe there is an explanation after all, but what kind of a joke argument to the contrary is this? This was a terrible idea of an article because this guy thinks he knows what happened. NO ONE knows what happened. The worst part is, as a free thinking human being, the falsified information given by several, “eye witnesses,” on the mainstream media for everyone to see, never surfaced with actual witnesses. This is a sham article, and whoever write it should be fired for trying to help the media cover this story up.

  • IMSweetOlBob

    The people (experts) identifying the gun being removed from his trunk wouldn’t know an AR 15 if you shoved one up —- Never Mind ! As it goes also with most of the rabid anti-gunners who are sure that no guns mean safety but hae never read an FBI report on the amount of crime.
    After all, you don’t have those scary black things going bang all the time and I’s sure that all the muggers, robbers, home invaders and rapists can learn to use nice quiet ball bats and refrain from scaring anyone who is afraid of loud noises.

  • jerryrip

    I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but why does this poor little dead girl’s parents dress up their younger child in the dead girl’s clothes? Kinda sick.

  • venus

    You people who think this was a hoax disgust me. All the fallacies have been debunked, google it. Every conspiracy theory has been explained logically. You’re the same fucktards who think the Holocaust never happened. There is no reasoning with some of you.

  • we’ll find the truth

    The story has changed way too much – Adam’s dad was killed, bro was a killer, found a body at bro’s apt. in NJ, the changing gun stories, mom was a teacher found dead at the school, Adam had a mental problem, different stories about what Adam was wearing. Dawn Hochsprung being a witness in the Newtown Bee when she was the first dead, eye witness accounts keep changing and conflict with other stores. They supposedly had 5 ‘active shooter drills’ in the area in the 2 months before SH. How did they get it so wrong with all that practice? We need a secondary investigation that has no connections to these f’d up people. Its the only way to get the truth.

  • UnintendedCQs

    I love a good conspiracy as much as the next guy. But with this many people supposedly involved – somebody would be spilling their guts by now. Heck – even high-up government officials with top security clearance can’t keep their mouths shut. Yet still – the gun grabbers in government and their willing accomplices in the media aren’t going to let this crisis go to waste.

RUSSIA ARISING? America Facing Some Hard Questions
ISRAEL’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL: Want Peace? Waste Hamas!
Load more