Barack Obama continues to unashamedly use last December’s murder of 20 Connecticut children to advance his war on the 2nd Amendment, parachuting in to communities that have suffered mass shootings at the hands of lunatics to screech lies while using victims’ families as wallpaper. I guess these people haven’t suffered enough. Earlier this week in Hartford, CT, they had to endure hearing the Dear Reader recite the following from his Prompter:
“This is not about me. This is not about politics. This is about preventing this from happening again. This is not about politics. This is about these families.”
There are very few statements that always true, that are indisputable 100% of the time. I am about to share one of those rare gems with you now, so listen up. When someone who emerged from the stinking slough of corruption that is the Chicago political machine tells you “this is not about politics,” you can be absolutely sure that it cannot possibly be about anything else. It’s like when someone tells you “it’s not about the money.” That statement is how you know that’s all it’s about.
Barack Obama and his allies hope that the soccer mommies, devoted viewers of Inside Edition, and The View, and similar members of the low-information cohort will be convinced by his phony and politically-motivated posturing that his latest attempt to gain more power over every single aspect of American life results from his concern for “the children.” It’s always “for the children,” isn’t it? Whenever liberals want to take away your money and your freedom, they become obsessed with “the children.” As touching as that sentiment is, I’m having a difficult time reconciling Barack Obama’s current obsession with those sweet little Newtown tots, and with protecting all the other children in America, with some of his policies, which demonstrate anything but concern for children. In fact, they show outright contempt for them.
Exhibit A-He’s OK with Infanticide
Barack Obama, this supposed defender of the innocent, holds views on abortion that are beyond extreme. While he was an Illinois state senator, he voted not once, not twice, but three times against bills requiring that babies fortunate enough to survive late-term abortions, who didn’t, to use his charming turn of phrase, come out “limp and dead,” be provided with medical care. He couldn’t support helping these innocent children because any suggestion that they were human beings might somehow infringe on “a woman’s right to choose.”
Nothing must tarnish the precious liberal sacrament of abortion in Obama’s view. His slobbering sycophants in the Lame Stream Media managed to cover up his hideously militant pro-abort votes during his first presidential campaign. They had no interest in telling the American public that their chosen One had no problem with the murder of babies in 2007, 2008, or even in 2012. Apparently, the years haven’t inspired any increased interest in that issue, since there has been a virtual blackout on coverage of the murder trial of abortion butcher Kermit Gosnell. Leave it to the British press to shine a light on what The Daily Mail accurately calls a “house of horrors,” The story describes testimony of medical assistant who claims he saw “about 100 babies born alive and then ‘snipped’ with surgical scissors in the back of the neck, to ensure their ‘demise’.
He also spoke of the gruesome scenes at the clinic which was allegedly found dirty and rundown with rusting surgical instruments.
‘It would rain fetuses. Fetuses and blood all over the place. It is literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body,’ he told NBC.”