So, were you wondering what happens when the run-amok lifestyle rights movements and the gimmie-my-government-handouts movements converge?
Well, wonder no longer! Here’s an article answering that question for us. Two excerpts:
“Should health insurers be legally required to offer infertility treatment for gay couples? Yes, according to a bill (AB 460) filed in the California legislature by assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco). In fact, refusing to do so should be a crime.”
“This raises a cogent question: Could AB 460 be construed to require insurance companies to pay for infertility treatments for gay couples simply because their sexual unions cannot produce children? For example, might the law require that insurance pay for an insured lesbian’s artificial insemination, even if she is fecund, based solely on her choice not to have heterosexual intercourse?
It would seem so. There is no requirement that actual infertility be diagnosed.”
It only gets better. Read the whole thing.