Have you noticed how the leftist media are criticizing Hillary Clinton for being too much of a centrist? Some analysts say this is an effort to get her to move more to the left. That may be true — but I think there is another reason. I think the leftists are trying to persuade centrist voters, many of whom are independent voters, that Hillary really is a centrist. In other words, they are trying to attract middle-of-the-road voters to vote for Hillary.
Frankly, I do not believe Hillary is a centrist by any stretch of the imagination. She’s a die-hard leftist and all of the leftist media manipulators know that. They will vote for Hillary come hell or high water.
Centrist voters — independent voters — must not be deceived by this clever manipulation of communications. Hillary is a staunch leftist. She is a student of neo-communist Saul Alinsky — just as Barack Obama is. She wrote her thesis on Alinsky’s quasi-communist strategy. She was even offered a job by Alinsky — but turned it down in favor of applying his strategy from inside of government rather than from outside.
Hillary is a tax-and-spend Democrat and, like Obama, enjoys rubbing elbows with the rich and famous. At this time, however, she is trying to reposition herself as an ordinary, middle-class citizen — and even claimed to be broke when she and Bill left the White House.
In fact, after leaving the White House, the Clintons raised millions selling books, giving speeches and soliciting contributions for their Clinton Foundation. It’s said she even solicited foreign contributions during her tenure as Secretary of State — and money from nations that discriminate against women.
Hillary’s primary qualifications for the presidency is that she’s a woman. Apparently she feels the American people are so naïve that they will elect her for the most important management and leadership position in history, simply on the basis of her gender. I say “simply” — because Hillary has an abysmal track record, even before she hooked up with Bill. Like Obama, she’s a great deceiver and was fired from an early position because of her deceptive practices. Her primary accomplishment in life was marrying Bill Clinton and riding his coattails to national prominence.
Furthermore, they say Hillary is the best-known woman in the world. Apparently the Democrats and the liberal leftist media consider celebrity to be a valid qualification for becoming the President of the United States and the Commander-In-Chief of America’s military.
Unfortunately, too many voters and journalists do not appreciate the managerial and leadership abilities required to run the affairs of state, the world, the military, etc. — to plan, organize, staff, direct, implement, motivate, control, measure, innovate, represents, develop, lead, decide, communicate, delegate and conclude.
Frankly, the problem with Hillary is the absence of a successful track record that would suggest she has the skills (above) required even after her 67 years, and her riding the coattails of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
Finally, an even more severe problem with Hillary is that she is a hypocrite on so many issues:
· She criticizes campaign financing — but yet she is going to spend over $2.5 billion to win the Democrat nomination;
· She criticizes income inequality and CEO compensation — while charging up to $300,000 for a one-hour speech;
· She claims to be the champion of women’s rights — but has no problem taking millions of dollars from foreign countries that depress women’s rights.
· She wants us to believe she is a middle-class, ordinary citizen despite her multimillion dollar income, enormous wealth, mansion lifestyle, and notoriety.
Clearly, Hillary is not qualified to be President of the United States. She is not qualified to be Commander-In-Chief of the US Military. She wasn’t even able to manage the Department of State honestly and effectively — resulting in the Benghazi catastrophe, the ongoing Middle Eastern debacle, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the personalization of her email communications and their subsequent illegal destruction, etc.
Needless-to-say, the USA has been in serious decline since Obama and his cabal — which included Hillary as Secretary of State — seized control of the federal government. The election of Hillary will, no doubt, perpetuate this decline.
Americans must not be fooled by thinking Hillary Clinton’s star-power will provide desperately needed leadership competence in the White House. How can voters trust someone like her, who is indebted to foreign contributors? How could voters want someone like this to be the leader of our country and of the free world?
She represents an era of past, 1900’s, government methodology — a Saul Alinsky approach to political manipulation — and a secretive approach based on deception and cover up.
Let’s hope and pray that everyone will do their part to get the word out about the real Hillary.
In God we must trust . . . but we must always do our part — to secure and promote the truth and a better way — to protect our freedom and interests — and to defend the Judeo-Christian American-Way.