This is some very hard truth to hear in the West. But somebody needs to say it.
The warning alarm was sounded by the inestimable Mark Steyn in his 2006 article published in the Washington Post, ‘It’s the Demography, Stupid’.
Here is the opening paragraph:
Most people reading this have strong stomachs, so let me lay it out as baldly as I can: Much of what we loosely call the Western world will not survive this century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our lifetimes, including many if not most Western European countries. There’ll probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or the Netherlands–probably–just as in Istanbul there’s still a building called St. Sophia’s Cathedral. But it’s not a cathedral; it’s merely a designation for a piece of real estate. Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for real estate. The challenge for those who reckon Western civilization is on balance better than the alternatives is to figure out a way to save at least some parts of the West.
Watch this 10-year old video conrfirmation of Steyn’s claims:
A year ago, Steyn revisited his initial article, which was the premise for his book, America Alone, in a new article, ‘It’s Still the Demography, Stupid’. He addresses the rise of refugees — in the millions — from Islamic nations into Europe.
The argument was straightforward. The western world is going out of business because it’s given up having babies. The 20th century welfare state, with its hitherto unknown concepts such as spending a third of your adult lifetime in “retirement”, is premised on the basis that there will be enough new citizens to support the old. But there won’t be. Lazy critics of my thesis thought that I was making a “prediction”, and that my predictions were no more reliable than Al Gore’s or Michael Mann’s on the looming eco-apocalypse.
Steyn argues that the flaw in the ‘secular social-democratic state’ is that it requires a ‘religious-society birthrate’ to keep it going. As western culture becomes more secular, the birth-rate tends to drop, and the need for massive immigration to sustain the welfare-state is imperative.
One problem, though.
The people that are coming into the western countries, do not feel the same draw to the secular, social-democratic state.
Case in point: Germany 2015.
Last year, Angela Merkel decided to attempt it. The German Chancellor cut to the chase and imported in twelve months 1.1 million Muslim “refugees”. That doesn’t sound an awful lot out of 80 million Germans, but, in fact, the 1.1 million Muslim are overwhelmingly (80 per cent plus) fit, virile, young men. Germany has fewer than ten million people in the same population cohort, among whom Muslims are already over-represented: the median age of Germans as a whole is 46, the median age of German Muslims is 34. But let’s keep the numbers simple, and assume that of those ten million young Germans half of them are ethnic German males. Frau Merkel is still planning to bring in another million “refugees” this year. So by the end of 2016 she will have imported a population equivalent to 40 per cent of Germany’s existing young male cohort. The future is here now: It’s not about “predictions”.
On standard patterns of “family reunification”, these two million “refugees” will eventually bring another four or five persons each from their native lands – or another eight-to-ten million. In the meantime, they have the needs of all young lads, and no one around to gratify them except the local womenfolk. Hence, New Year’s Eve in Cologne, and across the southern border the Vienna police chief warning women not to go out unaccompanied…
The ‘progressive’ values of ‘tolerance’ and ‘multiculturalism’ have made Progressives accomplices in the Islamification of the West.
Giddy Progressives will defend Islam, despite the blatant anti-western belief system that discriminates against the usual preferred ‘oppressed’ groups — minorities, women, and the LGBTQ.
- They call for Sharia Law — an Islamic-based system of law that legally discriminates against particular groups. It calls for ‘blasphemy laws’, like what is currently taking place in Canada with Bill M103
- They, (oddly, along with progressives,) defend the ‘religious liberty’ of women to be covered by hijabs because in Islam, to be attractive to men is sinful
- There is silence on the left about Female Genital Mutilation and so-called ‘Honor’ Killings
- There is no discussion of ‘Taharrush Gamea’, despite what happened in Cologne
- Most alarming, is the absolute silence on the cause of radical, Islamic Terror, despite it being a world-wide phenomenon
Perhaps it’s because the West has been resting on its success and believes itself to be invincible as a worldview.
And we need to realize it.
We need to stop being the ‘pussified’ beta-culture.
What we need is this:
ClashDaily.com’s, Editor-In-Chief, Doug Giles addresses our nation’s abysmal wussification in his NEW book …
The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity.
That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome.
In The Effeminization Of The American Male, Giles takes ‘Crispin’ from the unaccomplished, prissy and dank corridors of ‘Wussville’ up the steep, treacherous and unforgiving trail that leads to ‘Mantown.’
“Secretly, everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up. That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a p*ssy generation.” – Clint Eastwood
This is definitely one of the most politically incorrect books to ever hit the market.
It will most certainly offend the entitled whiners, but it will also be a breath of fresh air to young males who wish to be men versus hipster dandies.