Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

News Clash

WIKILEAKS’ BOMBSHELL! CIA Used THIS Code To HIDE Hacking While BLAMING It On ‘RUSSIANS’

Plot twist to that ‘Russia’ Story.

THIS will certainly complicate any investigation into Trump. And together with the malicious leaks? It makes one wonder what’s REALLY going on.

If US authorities are so VERY interested in what ‘really’ happened, why do we see THIS tweet?

Could we be right in assuming they are more interested in deep-sixing Trump’s Presidency than they are in learning the truth?

WikiLeaks has published hundreds more files today which it claims show the CIA went to great lengths to disguise its own hacking attacks and point the finger at Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.
The 676 files released today are part of WikiLeaks’ Vault 7 tranche of files and they claim to give an insight into the CIA’s Marble software, which can forensically disguise viruses, trojans and hacking attacks.
WikiLeaks says the source code suggests Marble has test examples in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi (the Iranian language).

It says: ‘This would permit a forensic attribution double game, for example by pretending that the spoken language of the malware creator was not American English, but Chinese.’
This could lead forensic investigators into wrongly concluding that CIA hacks were carried out by the Kremlin, the Chinese government, Iran, North Korea or Arabic-speaking terror groups such as ISIS.

Experts who’ve started to sift through the material said it appeared legitimate – and that the release was almost certain to shake the CIA. — DailyMail

Why are ‘news’ agencies so tone-deaf to anything that throws cold water on their derail Trump campaign? Here’s ONE explanation:

Or maybe they just can’t handle its implications. Like there really IS a crime, and they’ve been refusing to report it. Becuase the crook plays for ‘their’ team politically.

Wasn’t ‘NOT being ON a team’ the whole POINT of a supposedly ‘free press’?

Why don’t we trust journalists today? Gee, that’s a real stumper.

Share if Assange’s track record is more compelling than the Media (D)

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *