WUSSIFICATION: Judge Rules Trump INCITED VIOLENCE – No Word Yet On Snoop’s ASSASSINATION THREATS

The attacks attempting to undermine Trump’s Presidency keep marching on.

Isn’t it interesting how ‘impartial’ judges keep siding AGAINST Trump… even when other juges and legal experts back up Trump’s position?

First it was judges siding against his Constitutionally-defined authority to define immigration.

Now this. Remember this clip?

Protesters who didn’t think Trump and his supporters ought to be allowed to exercise their own freedoms of speech and assembly unimpeded tried to disrupt that meeting.

We have since learned that any number of such protesters were PAID operatives of the Democrats. (And they pretend to care so deeply about threats to the Democratic process. THEY are the threat!)

A federal judge ruled President Donald Trump incited violence when he yelled ‘get ’em out of here’ at a group of protesters during Louisville campaign rally.
Now, the protesters will be allowed to proceed in their lawsuit against the president, his campaign and three of his supporters.
Trump’s lawyers sought to dismiss the lawsuit by three protesters who say they were roughed up by his supporters at a March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky. They argued that Trump didn’t intend for his supporters to use force and used free speech as a defense.
Two women and a man say they were shoved and punched by audience members at Trump’s command. Much of it was captured on video and widely broadcast during the campaign, showing Trump pointing at the protesters and repeating ‘get them out.’

Oh! So, the judge was interested in ‘wider context’, was he? Well, what about THIS?

Security was on scene there, were they not? “Get them out of here” is an entirely appropriate instruction to security if you think someone is in a public meeting to cause a conflict.

The judge allowed alleged ‘racist slurs’ uttered from the audience to stand giving the incident a ‘wider context’.

Some of us still remember the claim that such slurs were uttered at Tea Party events, but — when Breitbart offered to donate $100k to the United Negro College Fund if they could PROVE it, nobody stepped up.

Have we already forgotten that Democratic operatives were caught on tape saying this:

We have people we’ve paid to do sh*t.
It doesn’t matter what the legal and ethics people say. We need to win this.

For the ‘wider context’, it’s talking about agitators going to Trump events specifically to start trouble.

Has anyone heard about Obama’s administration looking into such DOMESTIC threats to the Democratic process? Or was the weaponization of the government so NORMAL to their way of thinking that it wasn’t even a priority? Isn’t that ‘inciting violence’? Isn’t that a ‘wider context’ to view his remarks in?

Wider context — get them out of here — especially in light of those famous ‘they go low, we go high’ acts of violence against Trump supporters for daring to exercise their rights as American Citizens. Isn’t THAT inciting violence? Or are Democrats exempt? Were they not a credible threat?

The chick who started an anti-Trump riot in Chicago was on Clinton’s payroll. Is THAT at all relevant?

Add to that, the ‘wider context’ of Snoop’s references to assassinating Trump. (Or ‘lil Bow-Wow’s threats to ‘pimp’ Melania)

Or Ashley Judd’s and Madonna?…

… why do they get a pass? (Especially considering the power to influence unstable people such celebrities might have … look no further than the attempted assassination of Reagan to impress Jodi Foster!)

And that’s without even getting into the orchestrated attempts to actively undermine the Republican presidency by people who are specifically PAID to be apolitical public servants!

Nope. They’re only interested in nailing Trump. They’ll keep trying until something sticks. Anything. Whatever it takes to make him ‘illegitimate’.

They’re desperate to find SOME way to invalidate the voice of the Americans who voted. Becuase they DESERVE to be in power, dammit!

That’s what poor losers look like. Such wussies. They DESPERATELY need to read this:

ClashDaily.com’s, Editor-In-Chief, Doug Giles addresses our nation’s abysmal wussification in his NEW book …

The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles

Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity.

That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome.

In The Effeminization Of The American Male, Giles takes ‘Crispin’ from the unaccomplished, prissy and dank corridors of ‘Wussville’ up the steep, treacherous and unforgiving trail that leads to ‘Mantown.’

“Secretly, everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up. That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a p*ssy generation.” – Clint Eastwood

This is definitely one of the most politically incorrect books to ever hit the market.

It will most certainly offend the entitled whiners, but it will also be a breath of fresh air to young males who wish to be men versus hipster dandies.

Buy Now: The Effeminization Of The American Male

Screen Shot 2016-08-27 at 8.24.46 AM

Share if this obvious double-standard is sickening.

Like Clash? Like Clash.

Leave a Comment