Boom! Senate Begins Snooping Around Loretta Lynch’s Handling Of Hillary Probe – Here’s The 411

Grab your favorite beverage for this one. You’ll want to savor it, and maybe celebrate it.

Remember when Old Jeremiah Wright was yelling about chickens coming home to roost? He probably didn’t mean this. But it fits.

The Democrats — and their AV department, CNN — have been HAMMERING on the Russian collusion story since day one. They are convinced that they will eventually find something.

Then they hammered on Trump’s firing of Comey, even though most of them blamed Comey’s incompetence for Hillary losing the election.

But firing him was proof of… something. Not sure what, exactly, but give them time, they’ll make something up.

In the process of pressing Comey for dirt on Trump, Comey pulled a few Liberal skeletons out of their closets.

To which the Leftist media collectively said ‘Shhh, enough of that, tell us more about Trump.’ But we are supposed to see them as ‘politically unbiased’, right?

A Senate panel is investigating whether former Attorney General Loretta Lynch interfered in the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton’s private email server, according to a letter sent to Lynch on Friday.

The letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein asked Lynch to detail her involvement in the Justice Department’s investigation of Clinton and her correspondence during the course of it with members of Clinton’s inner circle or Democratic National Committee staffers.

…Comey had previously told lawmakers he “struggled” with how to handle the email probe because of “a number of things that had gone on … that made me worry that [Justice] Department leadership could not credibly complete the investigation and decline prosecution without grievous damage to the American people’s confidence in the justice system.”-NYPost

Guess what the BIPARTISAN Committee has found so far?

The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton’s campaign she wouldn’t let FBI agents “go too far” in probing the former secretary of state.– Read More

Ok, now that’s awkward. What does ‘wouldn’t let FBI agents go too far’ mean exactly?

That ‘lock her up’ chant just might be making a comeback. The only question will be: Hillary, Lynch or both?

And what about Obama? Do you really think they are so damned loyal to him that his name won’t come up if his fingerprints are anywhere to be found on this?

Grab your popcorn, because this show is just starting to get good.

Share if you’d LOVE to see them start digging into these people’s time in office.

Like Clash? Like Clash.

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.