Not working

Clash Daily

Journos’ Knee-Jerk Accusing of ‘Right-Wing Extremists’

By Mark Mayberry

April 20, 2013 at 11:52 am

Since Monday’s bombing, the media has filled the air with reports and rumors and it has increasingly become more and more of a fiasco. Several times now “sources” have either indicated a person was a suspect or made claims that have proven to be completely false.

Along with this has come another issue that seems to pop up every time a shocking and violent event occurs in the United States. The media immediately begins to build a case against the infamous right-wing extremists and nut jobs. Just to give you one example, when the Aurora movie theater shooting happened, the news media “broke” the story that the shooter was actually a “right-wing” Tea Party member. Turns out the guy’s only crime was sharing a name with the shooter. The Boston bombing has proved no different.

In the hours after the bombing, several media outlets and analysts made an early and uneducated indictment against right-wing extremists. Peter Bergen, national security analyst for CNN, made several claims in the first couple hours after the bombing. The first time Bergen simply threw out right-wing extremists as one of the usual suspects. This is not terrible in itself but what Bergen came up with next shows him to be a typical media hack. Bergen suggests again that it could be a right-wing extremist group because of the small scope of the attack. He then mentions other bombing attempts by al Qaeda and then goes on to comment that we have seen right-wing extremist attacks recently as well. He then references a failed attack on an MLK parade in Oregon.

The funny thing is there was a failed attack on an MLK parade in 2010, however it had no connection to a right-wing anti-government group. The would-be bomber, Kevin Harpham, confessed and was sentenced to thirty-two years in prison. Harpham also admitted to belonging to a Neo-Nazi group and stated that the bombing was in protest to multiculturalism in America.

Just to be clear, the last bona fide right-wing terrorist bombing took place in 1996 in Atlanta or a year before the Backstreet Boys would have their first hit single. This bombing was committed by Erich Rudolph to protest the governments abortion agenda. So let’s be clear about what exactly a right-wing extremist is. These domestic bombers almost never target innocent civilians, more than anything else they target government buildings and operations.

Counterterrorism expert Phillip Mudd speculated that if right-wing extremists carried out this attack he would not be surprised due to the fact that these groups are growing in strength and numbers in recent years. Actually I struggle to remember the last time I heard about the infamous anti-government groups carrying out any kind of attack. The left feels the need to overstate these groups' abilities in order to continue to have a “boogie man” to blame when things like this happen. This is a similar tactic to the one used by the left when they assert that the Ku Klux Klan is in fact alive and well. These groups are almost non-existent. Does this mean that they aren’t out there? Absolutely not, any one person can pull off this type of attack, but it is irresponsible and corrupt journalism to point to these groups without any reason except to press your political point.

Finally the most abhorrent reporting has come from CNN. CNN has reported, in a recent article, that an “undisclosed counterterrorism investigator” has told them, “that pressure cooker bombs have also been a signature of extreme right-wing individuals in the United States whom, he said, tend to revel in building homemade bombs.” This is a bold claim from a person that CNN can't name or identify. Could it be that CNN is just throwing spaghetti against the wall? This just doesn’t pass the smell test at all. In short, it is complete and total bull. In order for it to be a signature these groups would have to have been documented over and over again using these pressure cooker devices.

Unfortunately for CNN, they didn’t list one instance. Why you ask; because it has never happened. The example of Erich Rudolph used in the article is sophomoric at best. Rudolph used pipe bombs and a timer of course. To say that they are similar because they both use timers is like saying a dump truck gets the same gas mileage as a Civic because they both use tires.

However, there are a ton of examples of Islamic based militants using these types of explosives. In 2010 and 2011 there were several instances in which Islamic terrorist used this very device to kill and destroy targets. In 2010, Pakistani militants used these devices to attack and kill six Christian aid workers. Later that year, an Islamic militant was apprehended trying to leave a pressure cooking device in Time Square. In 2011 another Islamic militant was apprehended with several pressure cooking bombs that he intended to use on Fort Hood. This is all combined with the fact that al Qaeda released an article in their magazine Inspire that details how to build a bomb out of a pressure cooker.

With the latest developments, we see the men responsible for Monday's bombing obviously are not part of this evil, angry society of white Tea Partiers. So my question is: at what point do these “experts” have to pay the piper for their biased and dishonest opinions? Is it not as equally racist to immediately think of a southern white male when explosions ring out? Erich Rudolph is literally the only right-wing bomber the left can come up with and yet they are more likely to assume it’s the evil white man than the Islamic jihadi who has been doing it since Lava Lamps were cool, the first time.

Image: Peter Bergen, CNN's terrorism analyst; source: DVIDS archive; author: Sgt. 1st Class Eric Brown, U.S. Army Central Public Affairs; public domain