DEAR VOTERS: The UN And This LIBERAL RAG Are Terrified Of Trump – Is This A GOOD Sign?

Published on September 30, 2016

And THESE are the so-called ‘impartial’ people monitoring international elections?

Why are we still paying for our membership in this ‘wretched hive of scum and villainy’?

The United Nations News Centre — the official U.N. news service — tweeted, then quickly pulled, a post that called for “8 million Americans abroad” to “stop Trump.”

The tweet, published at 9:14 p.m. ET on Thursday, urged American expats to share a voter registration tool on the website of the activist organization Avaaz that states, “U.S. Citizens abroad could defeat Trump … if they voted.”


It seems the Socialist Left in the UN don’t like Trump much. They don’t seem to realize that for mainstream America, being hated by the UN is a GOOD thing and it HELPS Trump.

Someone over there with access though it would be a good idea to subvert the will of the American people. If Americans pressured the people of, say Angola or the Philippines to vote for their favored candidate, we would hear cries of ‘Colonialist’.

In the same way, journalists are supposed to be objective in collecting and sharing news, whatever their personal thoughts. This is why the editorial page is supposed to be separate from the main body.

But objective journalism is basically dead. (Could THIS be why? “Soros Spends Over $48 Million Funding Media Organizations“)

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.
USA Today

TRUMP is Unfit?

They are endorsing a habitual liar, with some really sketchy associations, owing favors to rich foreigners, who has handled national secrets in a manner that would land ordinary citizens in prison?

They DARED to include ‘honesty’ in the list of complaints against Trump… and, with no hint of irony they endorse Clinton? The woman who destroyed the lives and careers of any woman daring to say Bill was sexually inappropriate with them (including rape allegations).

The one whose tactic for avoiding public responsibility for any wrongdoing bears her last name?

Maybe THIS is why the paper was in decline?

Share if you think it’s time for a UNExit#

You Might Like