Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

News Clash

KISS OFF: Muslim Lawmaker Wants It ILLEGAL To Insult Islam

They’ve got a foothold in Canada now. But that’s not enough. Nothing is ever ‘enough’.

Ever read that children’s story ‘If You Give A Mouse A Cookie‘?

Basically it’s a story were ONE thing leads to a whole STRING of other absurd things that eventually lead back to repeating that FIRST thing a second time and restarting the cycle.

That’s what’s happening here. With Islam seeking ‘special’ status.

Anne Aly, Australia’s first female Muslim member of parliament, is pushing for a crackdown on free speech in hopes of expanding race-based discrimination laws to cover insults against those who follow the religion of Islam.

“Restrictive speech laws Down Under have banned people from saying anything which could ‘offend or insult, people because of their race,” reports Heat Street.

Now, Aly wants to add “religion” to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act in an Orwellian attempt to hold those who insult Muslims accountable. —DailyWire

Sounds all warm and fuzzy, doesn’t it?

Except that it isn’t about ‘equality’ at all. It’s to silence criticism, end debate, and let one side dominate unchallenged.

This is the same ‘tolerant’ crowd that burned down embassies when THIS cartoon was printed in a newspaper in Denmark.

turbanbomb1

Burning an embassy is an act of war.

Ezra Levant — the one Western Journalist with the stones to actually PRINT that Danish Cartoon — knows a thing or two about their tactics of harassing into silence. He wrote an article that exposes what they are REALLY up to.

Lawfare — a tactic of the “soft jihad”

Canada did NOT heed the warning. And now we will watch their freedoms erode one by one.

But in America, we still have free speech. In fact OFFENSIVE speech is the most important speech to keep free.

Remember how it was under slavery, for example? We NEEDED principled people to stand up and call this sin by its name. But that was OFFENSIVE to people of the day.

If we have no power to offend, we have no power to make meaningful social change.

And so, when a Triumphalist, supremacist movement rolls into town, flying the flag of ‘tolerance’ [at least until they are in the majority] what shall a neutered populace do if even their OWN GOVERNMENT forbids them to speak out?

Hitler isn’t the ONLY supremacist History has ever produced. If you take the time to examine Islam’s philosophy? They think they’re doing the West a FAVOR by enslaving it to Sharia. They think they are serving God and Justice by doing so.

Good luck telling them otherwise if we’re not even allowed to point out that their Religion of Peace has the ‘Prophet of the Sword’ as it’s founder, and that he consummated his marriage with a nine year old girl.

If they’re taking their moral cues from THAT, and we can’t even criticize it with WORDS… how will we EVER solve our differences peacefully?

Here’s a chart for you to consider as you think about that.

moderate-islam

For further reading? The Federalist wrote this helpful piece:

Political Islam Is Today’s Anti-American ‘Long March Through The Institutions’Political Islam implies a constitutional order fundamentally incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and the ‘constitution of liberty’ that is the foundation of the American way of life.

Share if America needs to remember the REAL purpose of free speech.