To her credit, when what you have to say isn’t very smart, you have to find some way to ‘sell the sizzle’.
At least she’s honest with herself about what people really see in her.
Some women, like Nikki Haley for example, are respected for their mind and accomplishments. Failing that, Emily Ratajkowski is finding another way to get noticed.
She’s baring her tatas for the cause. Has anyone told her that in this internet era, nudity isn’t quite the novelty it used to be?
Maybe she’s heard the name ‘Kardashian’?
Anyway, here’s her racist tweet in all it’s ‘profundity’:
— Emily Ratajkowski (@emrata) May 16, 2019
She used her naked body as a delivery system for her ‘message’. What was that message, from this woman who expects to be taken seriously? See if you can catch the racist implications in her ‘woke’ virtue signaling.
‘Old white men’ — Ok, she begins with an admission that she’s both ageist and sexist. Opinions aren’t good or bad because of who’s they are, but because they are or are not valid. (Later in that same tweet, she outs herself as the true racist in this conversation.
“Men in power imposing wills onto bodies of women…” — this was signed into law by a female governor. Also, 51% of the electorate is female. If men ever DID pose any serious threat to genuine women’s interests, women could vote as a block to put a stop to it.
Patriarchy — pretty rich for a chick who makes her money by parading her sex appeal… to men.
“Incest and Rape” a cynical and dishonest defense of abortion handled more fully in a piece we posted yesterday: Here’s 3 Reasons The ‘Rape & Incest’ Reason For Abortion Is BOGUS
Industrial Prison Complex: In the same tweet she’s making this an issue about black people having their rights oppressed, she’s saying that these black people will grow up unfit and wind up in prison.
That’s an argument from Eugenics. Margaret Sanger would be proud — in fact, that’s exactly her rationale for pushing abortion on black people, the poor and other ‘unfit’ persons. Will Emily go all-in and argue — like Sanger did — that these unfit persons should also be forcibly rounded up and put to work on farms?
“The second step would be to take an inventory of the second group, such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection and segregate them on farms and open spaces.” Those segregated in these camps could return to mainstream society if they underwent sterilization and demonstrated good behavior. Sanger estimates that 15 million to 20 million Americans would be targeted in this regime of forced sterilization and concentration camps. In Sanger, the humanitarian dream of a world without poverty and illness has deteriorated into a coercive world where the poor, the disabled and the addicted simply disappear. — Margaret Sanger. Source: American Magazine
To sum up…
Emily what’s-her-name thinks it’s bad that people to want black babies who have ALREADY been conceived should be killed in utero because they will grow up poor and therefore clog our prison system.
If she cares about poor black women raising kids on their own, there is a way she can advocate for them WITHOUT calling for the wholesale slaughter of a generation… one that will welcome a generation of black babies with open arms into a bright American future.
Remind them of the three statistics that really define ‘privilege’ and your shot at success in the American economy: Finish school, get (and stay) married, and keep it in your pants until you’re ready to commit to having a family.
The left can complain however they want about how ‘ineffective’ the abstinence message is, look around at the skyrocketing numbers of STD’s (including the drug-resistant kind) and the Public School message of promiscuity has NOT offered a better alternative.
If it did, the birth control debate would not need to center around the moral question of KILLING life in utero after the fact. Yet, here we are.
We’ll not hold our breath expecting a woman who thinks ‘baring her puppies’ for the cause will ‘get’ that argument.
ClashDaily.com’s, Editor-In-Chief, Doug Giles how-to book:
In ‘Raising Righteous and Rowdy Girls’, Doug Giles reinforces the notion that little women don’t need to be pampered by their fathers to turn out right. And having met his beautiful daughters, I know his philosophy works. As a strong-willed woman who thinks her daddy is the greatest guy in the world, I can tell you this is a must-read for every man who hopes to earn the same title. —-S.E. Cupp Best Selling Author & Fox News Analyst
By the way, since Facebook has unpublished ClashDaily’s page, your best bet to keep in the loop is to Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
We’re also moving onto a new platform, MeWe. It’s like Facebook without the data breaches and censorship.
Sign up and you can still get all the ClashDaily goodness by joining our MeWe group.
Do you love what we’re doing at Clash?
Do you want to kick in to our ‘war chest’ so that we Happy Warriors can maximize the size of the footprint we leave on Leftism’s backside? Here’s a link for ya to do just that.