WATCH: Hillary Says That ‘Joe Biden Should Not Concede Under ANY Circumstances’
The same woman who wagged her finger about a 'smooth transition of power' when she thought she had the victory all sewn up is now making an explicit call for Joe to reject the will of the people. (Unless he wins, of course.)
They're setting up a heads-I-win-tails-you-lose scenario. They don't give a rat's ass if they have to rip the country apart to do it. And they have been telegraphing this move for a long time.
It wasn't just the Russia-stole-my-election whining, either.
It's been there with Stacy Abrams whining that the election she lost by tens of thousands of ballots was 'stolen' from her.
It's been there with Democrat states fighting tooth and nail against any and every attempt to clean up the voter rolls so that nobody could vote with their dead relative's ballot. Like this Californian sleazeball did with his dead mom's ballot... in multiple elections.
We're seeing it with ballot harvesting, driver's license voting, NO-ID voting and now with the ruckus over the Postal Service. They want as much disorder and confusion as they can muster. Because they've got 600 lawyers on standby to exploit that chaos.
Hell, their party has not accepted ANY Republican Presidential election as truly legitimate since... at least, well... George H.W. Bush.
Do you remember when Democrats said that questioning the results of an election was an "attack on democracy"? That was all the way back in 2016.
Here's her battle plan for Decision 2020.
We've gotta have a massive legal operation, I know the Biden campaign is working on that, we have to have poll workers and I urge people who are able to, uh, be a poll worker. We have to have our own, uh, teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump are going to put outside polling places. This is a big organizational challenge.
But at least we know more about what they're going to do and Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out and eventually I do believe he will win if -- we don't give an inch.
So, the polls are already pretty close.
In her world, there is a zero percent chance of Trump winning by no more sinister a method than Trump winning enough votes, in enough states, to take the lead in the Electoral college.
That line of thinking sure sounds familiar.
'Why aren't I 50 points ahead, you might ask?'
And even with putting her thumb on the scale -- not to mention a British Spy, a bogus Dossier, some ridiculous Russian accusations and a handful of corrupted bureaucrats and their FISA warrant, she STILL lost to Trump.
But she may have tipped her had as to what her own side's strategies might be.
We will want someone ready to push back in case they start intimidating people at the polls.
We will want an army of volunteers involved in the polling to make sure nobody pulling any fast ones and we will want to be ready with our own army of lawyers to keep them from bringing their anti-Constitutional 'Resistance' tendencies into play on voting day.
They don't care about the voice of the people. They care about power.
If getting their hands on power means they'll have to disenfranchise a few million people stuff ballot boxes or pull any number of dirty tricks ... 2016 has shown us that they really believe the rules are for suckers.