OOPS: UN Genocide Expert SHREDS Gaza Talking Points With Facts And Data… Gets Sacked

She was hired as the UN’s Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide. She wrote a paper in 2022 where the official legal definition is spelled out. And now…? She’s out of a job.

Why? Because she failed to march lockstep with the talking points about Israel’s actions in Gaza.

The WSJ reports that the UN’s Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide has been dismissed after refusing to say that the campaign in Gaza fits the definition of a genocide based on the evidence.

Alice Nderitu, an accomplished mediator specializing in genocide prevention, led an office that issued a guidance paper on the proper use of the term “genocide.” The paper emphasized that UN officials should “adhere to the correct usage” of the term due to its political and legal sensitivities and its frequent misuse to describe large-scale crimes against specific populations.

Nderitu, who has served at the UN since 2020, was dismissed for asserting that Israel’s war with Hamas does not constitute genocide. She explained that while the conflict has caused significant loss of life, Israel’s actions aim to dismantle a terrorist regime, not to exterminate an ethnic group. She also noted that Israel has made efforts to minimize civilian casualties, even as Hamas uses civilians as human shields to exploit their deaths for propaganda.  — @HenMazzig

In her evaluation of the conflict in Israel, she has determined that the term ‘genocide’ does NOT meet the established legal definitions of the term. She encourages the UN to hold itself to the strict legal definitions for genocide in determining whether something does or does not meet the objective standard. Not only because of the frequent misuse of such an emotionally inflammatory word, but the heavy legal ramifications of using such language against a state.

To make matters worse, her evaluation of the Gaza and the West Bank revealed some of the language the UN wanted to tag Israel with might more accurately be applied to Israel’s antagonists.

According to Nderitu, the term “genocide” encapsulates the Holocaust, the genocide perpetrated by the Hutus on the Tutsis in Rwanda, the Serbian attacks on Bosnian Muslims, and the killings being carried out in Sudan.

With regard to Israel, the WSJ editorial noted, “As a legal matter, establishing a pattern of violence as a genocide requires demonstrating intent. Israel’s campaign of self-defense doesn’t qualify.”

The publication added that the UN’s November 14 report published by the UN Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices claimed the contrary – that there was “the possibility of genocide in Gaza and an apartheid system in the West Bank.”
[…] As such, the WSJ added, “Ms. Nderitu’s removal is a political choice,” with both Türk and groups hostile to Israel at the UN wishing to see her removed from her role.

“Beyond Ms. Nderitu’s fate, the damage here includes defining genocide down. The word has become a weapon of political propaganda that will erode its moral authority when it’s needed to describe genuine horrors,” the publication stated. — JPost

This last point is critical to keep in mind.

Because, to paraphrase an old movie line, when EVERYTHING is genocide… NOTHING is.

I Talk Back to the Devil is an action manual that sports thirty pure fire proclamations against the powers of darkness in three different categories covering, the wealth, the walk and the warfare of the Christian against Satan and his defeated ilk.

This NEW book will put a serrated edge on the Christian’s prayer life in these troubled times. This slim tome will embolden the believer to stop taking Satan’s crap.

Grab yours here.