About the author: Doug Giles

Doug Giles is the Big Dawg at ClashDaily.com and the Co-Owner of The Safari Cigar Company. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter. And check out his new book, Rise, Kill and Eat: A Theology of Hunting from Genesis to Revelation.

View all articles by Doug Giles
  • Benjamin

    The leftists are idiotic. This is a ruse!

  • JanMichaelVincent

    Staggering list.

    • fliteking

      I am sure 98% of those on the list are psychotic, liberal, or both.

      • Berzrkr50

        Psychotic and liberal… those two are one and the same to me!

  • http://twitter.com/Jonathanbierley Jonathan Bierley

    Why is it whenever you gun nuts try to bring up a point, you constantly prove that gun control works. LOOK at those tragedies and count how many people died!1 or 2, someone is only wounded…..AND 26 ARE DEAD IN NEWTOWN….. Do the f¥@KING MATH!!! You ban assault weapons and FAR LESS PEOPLE DIE

    Or, you will bring up Columbine, that ONE massacre happened AND SEVEN HAVE HAPPENED IN JUST 2012!

    • jeepdude911

      You liberal idiot! All of these attacks happened during the AWB. First, let’s be real, there ARE no assault weapons. That’s another term liberals plant in the conscience of the public, you know, like ‘global warming” another BS term. The math is too simple for those who deny reality. The more guns in the hands of law abiding citizens, the safer the streets. Wake up, commies.

    • Encycloman

      Most of the shootings occurred in locations that have been designated as “gun-free” zones. That means even if a good citizen, thoroughly checked out and trained, may carry a concealed gun, they CANNOT bring on to that location. The shooters already know there likely will NOT be anyone at where they are going with the ability to stop them.

      Plus, many of these shooters were on psych meds.

    • 2War Abn Vet

      No single gun law, and we have over 20,000 of them, has ever stopped a criminal intent on causing havoc. The liberals are as fully aware of this as are the gun
      owners. However, since the invention of firearms every wanna-be tyrant or
      despot has attempted to deny or restrict them to those they wanted to subjugate
      or control. That, in a nutshell, is the reason the Socialists push for gun
      control (actually confiscation) at every opportunity.

    • Huffer

      The root of every one of these terrible events is the deranged, immoral, mind of the one attacking the UNARMED! Even the deranged mind will avoid victim’s who can defend themselves because the perpetrator’s are cowards and cannot think clearly in their rage. Before God was forced out of the schools, and the public arena, these events were unheard of.
      The guns have always been in American culture so they are not the problem. It’s the Godless minds and self-centered hearts of people that is the problem.
      This mind set has been the goal of the liberal’s (societal leeches) from day one. A person with no morals or principles can be manipulated by the Illuminati and that is what we are seeing today!

      • guest

        MENTAL ILLNESS, you know the disease most of the RETARDS in Washington suffer from, is but one root of the problem!!!

        The RETARDS took prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance out of our schools, not to mention corporal punishment.

        WHAT THE FoCK DID THEY THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN ! ! ! !

        Plus, I believe most of those clowns are on Big Pharma’s PAYROLL, otherwise how else can you explain the pushing of these so called anti-psychotic drugs forced against one’s will by government interference.

      • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

        In self defense courses by trained professionals — basic is that the criminals are mostly cowards themselves, they look for the weakest and most defenseless victims and run when they encounter opposition…ie. especially deadly force. How about offering more of these courses for ‘free’ (obama likes to give out free stuff!)? Gun free zones are ASKING for trouble, seriously. This isn’t just some far out concept, it’s logical and supported by facts. KarenWI

    • http://twitter.com/DustyFae StarDust Dolittle

      When muslim throw acid on your child you wish to hell you had a gun. or some muslim force you to become muslim or beheaded, think about this.What about the 6 blacks beating up on one white person and leaving some brain damage. You wish to hell you had a gun.people having guns legally do not cause crime, they help to stop crime.They know their guns can be traced back to them and that is why only nuts kill.

      • Ciaran

        The FEINSTEIN’S are simply trying to avoid retribution, when Americans discover who the real Nation Wreckers are. .

    • DrewbeScrewed

      Here’s a thought, why don’t you do a full page add in your local paper showing a map with your address and state your claim to be a proud non-gun owner.

    • Citizen911

      You “Do the f¥@KING MATH!!!” guns are saving more lives then your wonderful 1994 – 2004 gun ban ever did. Only a moron can look at the staistics that were in place under a “GUN BAN” and try to twist it into logic for another gun ban. That’s perverted logic dude. Instead of banning guns we should ban GUN CONTROL FREAKS.

    • TexasJester

      What’s an “assault weapon”? A machine gun? You have to go through GOD to get one here. They’re already illegal. Ban something already illegal? Smart…

      An “assault weapon” is ANYTHING you can use to assault someone with. That includes, but not limited to, firearms, Molotov cocktails, knives, swords, automobiles, chairs, golf clubs, hammers, screwdrivers, rope, candlesticks, fists, knees, feet, etc, etc. HOT COFFEE can be an assault weapon, for God’s sake!

      Just yesterday, in Oregon (not 11 miles from where I sat for the weekend), a bus hit ice, went through a guard rail, and careened 85 feet down an embankment, killing 9 and injuring 20. Do we ban ice on the roads? Busses? Embankments? I haven’t looked up the numbers, but I’d venture to guess that bus crashes have killed more people in this country than LEGAL gun owners. Even with the legal gun owners protecting life and property.

      Banning weapons in this country disarms only part of the population: LEGAL GUN OWNERS. those that are he’ll-bent on destruction, or career criminals, will ALWAYS find a way to get guns and ammo. You can confiscate every legally owned gun in this country, and the only thing you’ll do is open up a shooting gallery, a la England and Australia. (Australia, btw, is looking at rescinding their weapons ban – the crime rate has gotten so bad..)

      Look at Chicago, New York City, and Washington DC – all have incredibly stringent gun laws. It’s next to impossible to purchase a firearm in these cities. Gun-related crimes are the highest in the nation in these cities. The people wanting to purchase LEGAL firearms can’t, and the criminals don’t give a rat about gun laws or gun bans. Those that commit murder aren’t concerned about weapons bans or “gun-free zones”.

      Gun control isn’t about controlling guns, it’s about controlling people.

      The best way to take over a country is to first disarm its citizens.
      - Adolf Hitler

    • Berzrkr50

      Why is it that all gun owners are called “Gun-Nuts”? That just goes to show that liberal hive mentality where there is no such thing as the individual, just the collective. Go back to your collective, Borg-Troll!

      • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

        Socialist liberals function as ‘collectives’ They don’t have a concept of individual accomplishments and standing on your own 2 feet (while generously helping the young, old, disabled who TRULY are in need — out of our own pockets and time). I don’t think they can think independantly either- from the ones I saw down at the capital in Madison last year. It was really an angry and threatening MOB mentality. A polar opposite of the tea party group and how they acted. Only ONE MAN of the 3 times I was down there at a tea party rally, stopped me and we had a civil thoughtful dialogue – listening to each other – about what our thoughts and beliefs were. The rest were shouting obsenities, screaming, blowing horns and yelling threats. No kidding. My mom and friends feared for my safety and now that I look back at it, they were right… KarenWI

    • The Old Man

      I wonder how many people could be killed if someone used a blow gun with 50 poisoned blow darts. The indians in the brazilian rasin forest still use them very effectively.
      They need to add blow guns and poison darts to the list to be banned. RIGHT??

    • DenverKitty

      Jonathan, when Obama’s hordes come to your door intent on looting, call me at 1-800-NOHELP4U.

    • Hawker 1

      I fear that there is no hope for such as you. Do you even know what is now called an assault weapon? Any weapon use in an assault on someone is an assault weapon. I do not think you have a brain just a sponge to repeat what the politicans tell you to repeat. You are a sad case of a yellow coward so get behind the politicans and you will be the second in line of fire.

    • Phillip_in_TX

      Why is it whenever someone brain dead (this means you) brings up a point, you fail to “do the math?” Guns are used EVERY DAY to PREVENT tragedies like Sandy Hook from happening. Most time crimes are PREVENTED using a gun, you never hear about it in the “lame stream media” because is doesn’t fit their agenda. Most times a “shot” is never even fired!

      Also, how many babies were “murdered” in abortion clinics last week? I’ll bet you is was more than 20! Plus, the government provides “funds” for these murders, yet “it’s not my fault Obama” isn’t even shedding a “fake tear” for that loss of life.

      Have some more Kool Aid, you need it.

    • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

      JJ, Calling everyone ‘gun nuts’ just reinforces that the liberal, socialist, communist, progressives use this tactic against people (here) you don’t even know because you can’t logically defend your position. That’s OK, people like me are used to that screaming tactic. I don’t like it on EITHER side by the way. It’s just so much more prevalent on the left and the Left media. KarenWI

    • Billy Hill

      All happened in gun free zones,fuk ken guns should know better,they’re not allowed there.

    • SemperFi

      Are you RETARDED Criminals don’t give a damn about LAWS.
      Laws to disarm the law abiding only makes it easier for the criminal
      to victimize the law abiding citizen. Move to the slums of Chicago and see if
      living where gun laws abound make you feel any safer. 500 murders so far this year where guns are not allowed.

  • fliteking

    Going out to buy a KelTec SU 16 this week. Thought about a highpoint 45 carbine . . .will opt for the quality instead.

    • noweareman

      Buy plenty of AMMO that’ll be the next thing they’ll go after!

      • fliteking

        Check.

        Have a safe and happy New Year.

      • LadyforLiberty

        Happy New Year!! Another 365 days ahead for Liberal Loonies (and that insults real loonies), to come up with “Solutions” about gun crime.
        To the Liberal Hard of Understanding lobby, who all dive behind a garbage bin when a car backfires, here is a little lesson.
        Most folks are stable and intelligent people, (tho intelligence varies), and like to be left the heck alone!!
        While normal people can normally walk away from trouble, some like to be involved in/cause trouble.
        A party affiliation DOES NOT indicate normality or otherwise. (Although liberals tend to want to mind everyones business while allowing their OWN to go to crap.)
        Lawful citizens choose what they do in life.
        Government tries to control what citizens do, even though the evidence points to the fact that, if people are LEFT ALONE, they live peaceful and productive lives, raising families attending churches, football games etc freely without needing LAW to guide their lives.
        Politicians and crats however DEPEND ON regulations to prohibit what THEY think is a problem. (Bear in mind that politicians and thinking are not mutually exclusive).
        So, we buy a gun to shoot critturs.
        We live in the wild…that bit of US that Liberals avoid at all costs…and the gun is like a spade or other implement to us.
        We have a gun as a NY apartment dweller has a pot pipe!
        Then some lunatic with a grudge goes out and kills people.
        Normal folk then get an urge for justice and reach for their guns whilst the pot smokers cry foul!

        Politicians listen to the dependent, not those upon which the USA was based as a nation….the independent!

        With all the fuss about guns, politicians only have ONE standpoint.
        It is knee jerk with a tendency to populism!
        gun crime occurs: libs cry BAN!
        Real. normal people think Gimme a BREAK!
        The real world v the ideal world that politicians and their commie/ liberal friends inhabit.
        If a couple own a ranch they put signs up “Keep out..private land”.
        Normal people respect that, other people trespass!
        Warning off trespassers when those people cannot read is NOT the fault of the land owner.
        Sometimes protection of your own property involves a gun!
        If trespasser ignores warnings (like a shot in the air), then he/she take responsibility for the consequences.
        If at a later date and an Obama libtard takes the consequences to court, he claims the land owner has NO RIGHT to defend his property!
        THAT is the route which the Dems wish to take the USA!
        One famous man late president of the NRA said it all: “Out of my cold, dead hand”!!
        Maybe those pushing gun control have an agenda aimed at making that scenario come about!!
        The Conservative warning to that, (and you do not have to vote GOP to be a Conservative), is to point at the Constitution, (particularly Amendment 2), and proceed from there.
        Which way is YOUR way????
        In the 365 days of 2013, more BS will be spoken by politicians and favor currying media.
        But, as in 2012, normal citizens will be ignored.
        My advice on the gun debate?
        If you have guns, keep them.
        If you want a gun, buy what you like.
        If more “outcry” from whatever direction. Sure, listen, but how you decide is UP TO YOU!
        All politicians WORK FOR THE CITIZEN in the USA!!
        Do not let them FORGET OR IGNORE this fact, or the trouble may be YOUR fault.
        God Bless you all, and God Bless the United States!
        Have a happy 2013!!

        • TexasJester

          Well said!

        • fliteking

          excellent.

        • DenverKitty

          Wow! You said it ALL, and you said it just RIGHT! And you just earned “Comment of the Day!” Gratz!

        • Sarah Conner

          AMEN AND HAVE A GREAT NEW YEAR !!!!!!

        • BD Katt

          Look up & read the”Dick Act”of 1902.The 2nd Amendment is set in stone.

  • Dale Patterson

    Let’s not forget that Osama bin Laden also happened on Clinton’s watch… As did so many other negative things that ruin this country… The Clintons, both of them, are like a slow moving train wreck… Everything that they and their cohorts did is public record…

  • JohnWayne

    Logic doesn’t matter to Democrats. Their goal is to get the guns and that’s it! Teddy Kennedy and his cohorts passed the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act in 1968. Among its provisions were that persons who had been declared mentally incompetent by a court, persons under indictment or convicted of a felony, dishonorably discharged veterans, non-citizens of this country and persons who have renounced their United States Citizenship could not possess nor purchase any firearm nor ammunition . . . That really worked, didn’t it? I’d wager there weren’t 1000 cases filed in the whole United States under that law. I could muster a little respect for the “Progressives” if they’d admit what their goal really is.

    • EMIRCITNA

      WE will “admit” their goals FOR them!

      “The goal of socialism is communism.”
      ~ Vladimir Lenin

      “Democracy is the road to socialism.”
      Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto

      “As long as we have the minds of the majority we will reach our goals.”
      ~ Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto

      “Keep the people busy in toil for their daily bread and on their holidays occupied in sports so as they will not have time to find out what we are doing.”
      ~ Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto

      • Alexander Davidson

        We dont REALLY have to worry about COMMUNISM per se, in it’s real meaning ever happening. That is because communism has never actually lasted more than a few months! Reason: Man simply cannot practice sharing all wealth by law… he ends up finding loopholes, storage, and other ways of gaining whatever wealth he can find for preservation of his own lifestyle. ALL communist countries are in fact modified dictatorships. Socialist governments do work in most cases, and have a well-balanced population, with free education for all by choice, and essential medical care for all by choice… People can still gain fortunes and pay taxes (of up to 60% for those earning over $1mil per week.)… all with a democratic process that works in practice better than the USA has, where USA’s Presidential system allows abuse of presidential powers: The Westminster system does not allow a PM to abuse powers and get away with it more than a day, and that abuse is retro-actively removed. THINK ABOUT THAT! America is not the free-est country in the World!

        • Arationofreason

          If your are clairvoyant, try telling that to 30-50 million Chinese who starved to death under Mao’s communism.

  • gemini34

    Diane sounds like Hitler. Didn’t she learn anything from history?

    • Ciaran

      Actually – she did. The FEINSTEIN’S have been though this drill before. The reasons FEINSTEIN and Joe LEIBERMAN and Chuckie SCHUMER are trying for a desperate gun grab is because once the USA collapses – the population will look for REAL answers, abd not swallow the schmaltz on TV. That’s always ended the fun times and whlesale looting of the FEINSTEINS. The FEINSTEIN’S made about a billion shekels cutting deals with Communist China, to oursource American manufacturing industries wholesale. The FEINSTEIN’S are trying to prevent what’s happned 109 times before. FYI – try to learn some real history. The NS did not grab guns. The NS passed laws that mandated proper care and use of weaponry. Do you know that once Old Adolf reclaimed the money supply and banking from the Greenspans and Ben Shalom Bernanke’s of his era – the Germany economy took off like a rocket? Germany was out of the manufeactured “Depression” in less than 2 years, whilst the USA fumbled and staggered around under the machinations of the Wallsky Street crowd until Americans agreed to go kill Germans.

  • 2War Abn Vet

    Everything government does with regard to guns is aimed at disarming honest people.
    Nothing government does will have any effect whatever on criminals. It is all a
    smokescreen to subjugate, and more it easier for government to control, the public.

  • Winghunter

    Enough! Charge the witch with treason.

    “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” – Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788

  • william rauh

    I do not own guns and will say something has to be done. I agree a ban will not solve the problem simply because there are always ways to get a gun. And someone that wants a gun or guns, crimnals, gangs etc will ALWAYS be able to get their hands on a gun.

    The solution does not ly in a ban it has to do with sociatal changes, belief changes, moral changes, family changes, heart changes. This will never happen in this country when we let certain elements control what we can and cannot do, what we can an cannot believe, can and cannot follow our religions (all), worship as we would olike (all) raise our children to be law abiding and respectful citizens, have morals, not give a damn about being politically correct, not worrying about saying something like MERRY CHRISTMAS because somer one might not be a Christian (what happened to a Chirstian’s rights). This country is in a sorry state. Banning guns won’t take care of all , if any of our problems. Where we could maybe begin is doing away with the ACLU.

    • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

      Respect that you are a NON OWNER and have the great insights you do. God Bless KarenWI

      • coastx

        I see a relationship developing here. You two, space please, and take your seats. ( The Island)

    • Oldtex

      William,you are right .Laws against fire arms will not solve anything. What importance would a to be mass murderer place on a gun law that he holds in contempt. The solution lies in the minds of people. Violent video games are mesmerizing the minds of our young on an ever increasing basis and yet we wonder why crimes like Sandy Hook are on the rise. The lone terrorist of the middle east seldom uses a firearm. Yet firearms there seem to be plentiful, Why is that? Bombs are much more highly productive.

  • KittyKittyKit

    HERE’S AN EASY ANSWER TO THE WHOLE THING.

    Just like in HUNTING SEASON, everybody steps out the door at a SPECIFIC TIME on a SPECIFIC DATE carrying their loaded weapons.

    Get the message out by tweet, facebook (that’s a laugh) e-mail, phone calls, text messages or whatever means you can come up with.

    BECAUSE OF THE URGENCY, We need to ACT SOON.

    We’re NOT looking to cause ANY TROUBLE, just stand on our Constitutional RIGHTS.

    DAY: Saturday………..DATE: JAN. 26, 2013…………TIME: 9:00 a.m. EST

    Just like in HUNTING SEASON, everybody steps out the door at a SPECIFIC TIME on a SPECIFIC DATE carrying their loaded weapons. ONLY THIS TIME, PATRIOTS………We NEVER stop carrying them.

    WE are NOT the LAW BREAKERS. ANYONE trying to take OUR weapons is the lawbreaker.

    Charge them with TREASON and make a CITIZENS ARREST. It is the COPS DUTY to place them under arrest and take them down and BOOK ‘EM.

    We WILL put them on trial for TREASON and if they are found GUILTY, we WILL ask for the DEATH PENALTY. That’s what we do with TRAITORS. We LEGALLY put them to DEATH.

    Do that a FEW times and they’ll leave us alone about our GUN RIGHTS.

  • marineh2ominer

    Weapons bans have nothing to do with public safety and is in fact detrimental to said security . Weapons bans are all about an ideology that gives an elite few absolute power and control over every man , woman , and child in the nation . The proof is in the total ineffectivenes of all other weapons laws passed in the United States ( or the world for that matter ) through out history , and knowing this they still go to RADICAL lengths to eliminate them .

  • fedupinky

    Within the last few weeks, two people have been killed by subway trains. In both cases it was reported they were pushed onto the tracks by people exhibiting signs of mental illness. Ok Dianne, get your ugly carcass back to work and start drafting a bill to ban those assault trains. By the way, it is also reported that you carry a loaded .38 in your purse. What are YOU afraid of? Hmmmmm?

    • JibJab

      Ban the assault pushers.Diane Frankenstein carries a concealed weapon to chase her husband off when he wants sex.

  • EMIRCITNA

    SOCIAL DEMOCRATS (Communists) follow their bottom line as dictated by their mentor:
    “IN ORDER TO OVERTHROW A NATION ITS PEOPLE MUST FIRST BE DISARMED”
    ~ Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto
    WHY do you think it is IMPOSSIBLE to REASON with them?! ~ THEY HAVE A GOAL to meet and NO common sense, statistics OR PROOF will sway them from their “mission”!

    • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

      Yes, I now think that they won’t have an HONEST and CIVIL exchange of ideas because they are DISHONEST and DECEPTION about their beliefs and motives. They can’t tell they truth – “I want to take over the country, bring down the upper and middle class of America to one lower class ruled by the elitist politicians.” They CAN only yell and distract and name call, because they are hiding their true motivations and their true ‘end goals’. But what really confounds me is why so many MIDDLE CLASS Americans believe the commmunist/socialist propaganda when it will be destructive to THEM. I believe that the true IMPACTS of what obama is doing haven’t hit yet…..it’s death by a 1000 cuts….the progressives are slowly chipping away at our money (that WE EARNED) and our freedoms. Some folks are blind to what the final outcome will be. KarenWI

      • EMIRCITNA

        Grant, Hosea 4:6 says it all:
        “MY PEOPLE PERISH FOR THEIR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE”!!!

  • raven-1911

    And the grand daddy of them all is that there is no constitutional authroity for the central government to be involved in ANY public polic action or assistance; none, nada, zilch. But what do we expect from those that ignore the Constitution and find no negative ramifications when they do ignore the Constitution. Do they lose their jobs? Are they fined? Lose reelection? Taken out in the street and released Mao style? Nope – if there is no ramification for obeying the Constitution; why should they? Just as most Americans would not pay the unconstitutional income tax if it were not for the threat of jail and men with guns coming to take them away they would not pay it. We need to have dire ramifications for any elected official that violates the Constitution.

  • Bob Honiker

    Of course it won’t work and the liberals know it. Their plan is to get it passed and when it fails they will claim a need to ban even more. They won’t be happy until they’ve banned them all, and any claims they make to the contrary are completely false.

  • Rich

    Lets see, Johnny a known trouble causer in 1st grade goes crazy band hits Bobby with his baseball bat and knocks him out. School Principal bans all bats for the rest of the school children that didn’t do it. Then introduces a law in Congress to ban all bats in the USA, especially the black ones. Liberal brain dead logic. Johnny given verbal warning not to do that again.

  • lizaz

    When will they address the REAL reason for these mass shootings……MENTAL HEALTH!!! Every shooter is a nutcase!!!

  • coastx

    The liberal message will always be: INQUISITION! They way they SAY this will always be different.
    The gullible populations they use this con on will always be genocided,
    but people have to go through the process to believe it and understand
    how this works. This is why Albert Pike referred to people as herd
    animals. They are! Ba- aa- aa…

  • JRW

    Your article is preaching to the chior. We all know an AWB didn’t work and won’t work, but the idea appeals to the kumbya crowd. It also appeals to the big government control crowd who believe people are to stupid to be trusted unless they are “guided and provided for” by the intelligencia (them). God help us though, because the uneducated, uninformed, uninvovled amongst us are buying into the argument.

    • coastx

      You got that right! If the human race were a giant brain, this earth would a collective IQ of about 75, somewhere between a stupor and the ability to perceive how to reproduce.

      • Arationofreason

        Unfortunately the later apparently requires even a lower number.

        • coastx

          I, uh, er… didn’t want to throw anyone into a panic, but you’re correct!

          = )!

  • borg

    If Ghandi were alive they would suspend his acount too.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Fred-Mitchell/100000126962566 Fred Mitchell

    Lets face it.This is what its coming to.Teachers have to be armend,or what are we gonna do> wait on 24 more kids to die.

    • Arizona_Don

      Not only is this what it is coming to but it is going to get even worse if another gun law (ban) is enacted. Let me give an example. In the inner cities (OK slums) the idiot teenagers are going to take them to school to kill the teachers. Color makes no difference. Anyone who nievely thinks they can actually ban guns and provide safety for the masses is dreaming. That will never be possible in this country. As long as they keep making the violent movies and games and (those same idiots) can’t distinguish the difference it will never improve. The only thing that makes a difference is intelligence (in other words education). However, our current education system is an indoctrination not education. Until we start teaching again rather then indoctrinating it is not possible to improve. Even our president it indirectly or directly teaching hatred consequently what can we expect?

      There is an answer however, bring God and Patriotism back to the class room. Morals, honesty, pride, reason and respect must be brought back as well into the education system. Without these things America dies. America must wake up to these facts before it becomes to late, if it already isn’t. Time will tell. At one time if someone you knew said something it meant something. That is no longer the case in many instances. A hand shake is no longer your word, and that is sad, very sad.

      • SemperFi

        If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under.

        Ronald Reagan

        Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/ronald_reagan.html#o2QY7vmuTrZ7iP6b.99

        • Arizona_Don

          I hope many people got to watch Beck yesterday. 1-3-13. No it wasn’t politics. Republicans vs Democrats. It’s about what the problem is with the mass murderers, massacres if you will, and what it will take to curtail it. It is not more gun laws. If gun control laws were going to stop or prevent these killings they would have never happened in the first place. After all there are over three thousand restrictive gun laws on the books now that do not curtail anything. Some even make things worse. However, all this concentration on guns is not going to solve anything. It is the person who commits these massacres that we must concentrate on if we are to solve the problem. How did we get here? It was all started to be covered by the one person who seems to be demanding truth on the network that claims “the truth lives here.” Glenn Becks The Blaze Television.

          Lt. Col. (Ret) Dave Grossman, a guest on Glenn’s program yesterday, who is an instructor of much of our military and law enforcement officers. Spoke to what the real problems are today in our schools and it is not the lack of gun laws. It would be impossible for me to relate the whole hour even if I had a perfect memory which I don’t. However, he has, I believe, hit the nail on the head with his analogy as to what is causing these massacres. Furthermore, he pointed out the fact the perpetrators of these atrocities have become immun. to this violence and no longer see it as reality. The culprit video games and violent movies. They are actually training our children to become immun to the act of murder. Listening to him talk makes one wonder how our society has allowed such atrocities to occur and also realize we should have seen this coming and we may have had we not become apathetic about our children just as we did about our government. Again we reap what we sow.

          I know, as do many others who were both in the military and law enforcement, we watch movies and train to become reactive. It does not come naturally to take a human life most of us must train to perform under stress. That is exactly what those video games do to our children, the same thing as our simulators and training. Many of us have been saying this for years, however, now it is backed up with research. Considerable research.

          Lt Col (Ret) Dave Grossman not only spoke to the problem and explained it better then I have ever heard it explained before, in the coming days Glenn and perhaps he will discuss the real cures for this horrific problem(s). However, one thing is for sure it is not more restrictive gun laws that will solve this problem!

  • danclamage

    Gun Free Zones is Kindergarten logic. Teachers forbid violence amongst their students, understandably. When a kid uses a toy, say, irresponsibly, the teacher takes away the toy. Then the kid uses a ruler. So take away the ruler. The kid finally uses his fists or fongernails, and winds up in the principal’s office.
    But as adults, when violence is used, the most understandable and defensible act is to meet it with violence.

  • Tonto

    “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.” — Mahatma Ghandi

    A far greater intellect than I could ever aspire to be …

  • Kygator

    Feinstein is an excellent sponsor for the Ovomit attack on The Second
    Amendment and the Federal control of the citizen’s guns! She is a total
    simpleton and has never accomplished a single positive objective in her entire political
    career! ( Getting elected can’t be counted since she resides in California – the
    Land of Fruits and Nuts!!)

  • ADRoberts

    Every shooting had a chance of a different outcome if the teachers and adults in the schools had all been armed. It remains that even children know that the situation is different if they face someone with a gun.
    Right now, EVERY shooter knows that, until the cops get there, they are the only one who will have a gun. And that is true in colleges and universities, where the liberal professors think they have EVERYTHING covered.

    • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

      People cower in closets and bathrooms, hiding behind anything they can find, with nothing to defend themselves. It hurts a lot every time I hear this happening. KarenWI

  • ecoplastican

    Further proof that liberals only serve their agenda in defiance of the facts.

  • http://www.facebook.com/grant.halverson.1 Grant Halverson

    FACTS! Liberal socialist communist progressives – whatever you want to call the current group of people bringing down the economy of our country – DO NOT DEAL IN FACTS. They deal in deceptions, lies, knowing that they can ‘lead’ ignorant/stupid people (i.e. followers) by platitudes and ‘caring’ soundbites. They also disparage ANYONE who thinks differently than them – calling them racists, haters, greedy, etc. The true patriots need CLEAR VOICES representing us NOT John Boehner. He is ineffective in how he articulates the truth of the prosperity and freedoms for all in our country. KarenWI

  • Anthony Alexander

    Feinstein is another liberal jerkoff that can’t tell firearms from a campfire. Most of the slaughtering in mass killings are done with PISTOLS. Assault weapons are carried with them with bulletproof vests and ammo as all part of the statement . The jerkoff liberals immediately go on the attack on weapons that has nothing to do with what happened. Moreover I am waiting for the day when someone walks into a church or McDonalds with a flamethrower and starts a barbeque on unsuspecting patrons. Then there will be a ban on everything from zippo lighters to bic lighters and you will need a permit for a book of matches. In Typical liberal fashion they are always trying to attach a solution
    to a problem that has nothing to do with the problem.

    The problem lies with a long list of
    smaller problems over a long period of time since the early 1960’s till now
    with the dehumanizing of human life, the disrespect for life, the culture of
    death that pervades movies and games, and the list goes on. Here is a link that
    explains it well. Note that Dr Welner explains
    that guns have been around for a long time, but these type of mass killings have
    stated for the reasons noted above among other things he lists. Psychiatrist Dr.Welner: Why CT Shooter Adam Lanza killed – YouTube – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU24i3Th27U

    Lastly Obama added. “This week I called on Congress to take up and pass common-sense legislation that has the support of the majority of the American people, including banning the sale of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, and making sure criminals can’t take advantage of legal loopholes to get their hands on a gun.”

    This proves Obama’s credulous nature (like all democrats) on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, the illusion that take advantage of legal loopholes.

    Criminals don’t use anything LEGAL they get guns ammo and clips ILLEGALLY like the drugs they also sell and distribute. What is needed is an enforcement of over 600 existing gun laws that could be used in the prosecution of these criminals that liberals refuse to enforce but instead use the current chaos created by their non-enforcement of existing laws to push their doctrine of elimination of the second amendment.

    What is needed is real conservatives to stand on principle and existing laws and stop this liberal nonsense that is also pervasive in their train wreck of an economy under their watch.

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    Further proof that Barack Hussein Obama has trampled the United States Constitution.

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/27/jan-morgan-video-documentary-rampant-injustice/

  • PatRiot

    Ban gun free zones,institute mandatory concealed carry for teachers,I would think most own & know how to use guns.Mandate 1 armed officer at each school.

  • Marlin208

    Ok, these bottom feeders are releasing all these illegals that have committed assorted crimes in this country and their biggest worry is law abiding citizens having guns. Anyone hazard a guess as to why ? This government is now so corrupt there isn’t a chance in hell that I will give up my only protection against them and that is exactly what they want.
    If you look at Frankensteins gun ban it covers just about everything you can own and to sweeten the pot she wants finger printing and registration to boot.
    This is what happens when you let the mentally incompetent run the show. Oh and how they love chaos, I think that is in their hand book. Hold on to your hats folks, it is going to be a bumpy ride.

  • http://www.yahoo.com/ Dave the Barbarian

    Let me start by saying I despise Diane Feinstien. I don’t know her, i’ve never met her but she’s the kind of person who has no respect for the rights of individuals who have harmed no-one and whose only fault is they don’t fit into her arrogant little worldview of perfection. She is a small worthless little human being who’s only claim to fame is being elected into a position of power. Do us all a favor madam, GO AWAY OR GO TO HELL! Molon Labe!

  • Richrd Hogue

    Why Confuse the poor Lady (Fienstien) with facts? She is a typical female who operates on emotions rather than facts. (Sorry ladies, I know there are some of you who can walk, talk, chew tobacky, and think at the same time; but there are not very many who can.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Young/100001630951601 Mike Young

    So put that in your pipe and smoke it Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Dick Durbin, President Barack Obama, Congressman Chuck Schummer and all of you other anti gun Liberal Progressive Legislatures. You can’t stop a mentally impaired person from going on a shooting Spree especially in a “Gun Free Zone”, otherwise known as a Safety Free Zone no matter how many anti-gun laws you enact, because a mentally impaired person does not care one iota about your stupid laws.

    What part about this don’t you understand. Mentally impaired people don’t care what laws you enact, only law abiding people who would not go on a shooting rampage care about laws, and these are not the people you and the rest of the nation need to be worried about.

  • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    The 1968 Omnibus Crime (Gun) Control Act is word for word verbatim to the 1938 Nazi Weapons (Ban) Act.

  • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    Violation of Oath of Office – Senator
    Dianne Feinstein

    The
    Constitution requires that all members of Congress must take an oath of
    office to support the Constitution before assuming office. In order to comply
    with the Constitution, Congress has enacted federal laws to execute and enforce
    this constitutional requirement.

    Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is
    divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the
    law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C.
    3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are
    required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C.
    3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the
    oath of office required by 5 U.S.C.
    3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their
    tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C.
    7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation
    of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government
    (including members of Congress) to “advocate the
    overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law,
    18 U.S.C.
    1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C.
    7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a
    fine.

    The Constitution requires that all members of
    Congress must take an oath of office to support the Constitution before
    assuming office. In order to comply with the Constitution, Congress has enacted
    federal laws to execute and enforce this constitutional requirement.

    Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into
    four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for
    purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual
    oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.
    5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign
    an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate
    that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part
    of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a
    federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone
    employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional
    form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation
    of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from
    office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

    The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of
    enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a
    violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the
    oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the
    government of the United States
    by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the
    Constitution of the United
    States. It can only be “altered” by
    constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government
    officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government
    other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    5 U.S.C. 7311 clearly specifies it is a criminal
    violation for any member of Congress to advocate the overthrow of our constitutional
    form of government or our Constitution. The definition of the word “advocate” is to: “defend by argument before a
    tribunal or the public: support or recommend publicly.

  • Cameron

    I’m forwarding this to the editor of a local paper, who is very anti-”assault weapon” gun. He needs a good swift kick in the ass to open his Liberal eyes & see the truth.

  • NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    Startling evidence suggests that the U.S. Gun
    Control Act of 1968

    was lifted, almost in its entirety, from Nazi legislation.

    Original article appeared in Guns and Ammo Magazine May 1993

    Are you tired of being told that “gun control” is a chronic pain that
    you have to accept because there’s no cure? Do you — a law abiding person –
    want to be free: to own whichever firearms you want to own, regardless of where
    in America
    you live; from waiting periods, gun bans, magazine capacity restrictions, etc.;
    to spend your time on the range or in the field, rather than fighting “gun
    control”?

    Are you tired of giving hard earned bucks to efforts that have at best only slowed
    the gun grabbers’ push toward firearms registration and confiscation? If you
    have had enough of death by a thousand cuts, you are ready to take action to
    wipe out “gun control” — now.

    Members of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) consider
    “gun control” to be an aggressive cancer. JPFO has a cure, a way to
    destroy “gun control”. JPFO has hard evidence that shows that the
    Nazi Weapons Law (March 18, 1938) is the source of the U.S Gun Control Act of
    1968 (GCA ’68). Adolph Hitler signed the Nazi Weapons Law. The Gestapo (Nazi
    National Secret Police) enforced it. In “Gun Control”: Gateway to
    Tyranny we present the official German text of the Nazi Weapons Law and a
    side-by-side translation into English. Even more deadly: a side-by-side,
    section-by-section comparison of the GCA ’68 with the Nazi Weapons Law. If you
    have this in your hands, no one can tell you that you’re imagining things.

    The clincher: JPFO knows who implanted into American law cancerous ideas from
    the Nazi Weapons Law.

    The likely culprit is a former senator, now deceased. We have documentary proof
    – see below — that he had the original text of the Nazi Weapons Law in his
    possession 4 months before the bill that became GCA ’68 was signed into law.

    This former senator was a senior member of the U.S.
    team that helped to prosecute Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, Germany,
    in 1945-46. That is probably where he found out about the Nazi Weapons Law. He
    may have gotten a copy of it then, or at a later date. We cannot imagine why
    any U.S.
    lawmaker would own original texts of Nazi laws. To find out his name, read on.

    With this hard evidence in your hands and in your head, you can destroy
    cancerous “gun control”. You can challenge anyone who backs “gun
    control”. You can show them the Nazi ideas, line by line.

    The parallels between the Nazi law and GCA ’68 will leap at you from the page.
    For example, law abiding firearm owners in Illinois,
    Massachusetts and New Jersey must carry identification cards
    based on formats from the Nazi Weapons Law. Nazi based laws have no place in America.
    Thousands of Americans died or were wounded in the war to wipe out the Nazis.
    They did not suffer or die so that Hitler’s ideas could live on in America and
    kill more Americans. Remember Killeen,
    Texas! The 23 who died in Luby’s
    Cafeteria there died because they obeyed Nazi inspired “gun control”
    laws. The law forced them, unarmed, to face an armed madman.

    To destroy “gun control” before more law abiding Americans are
    murdered by criminals or madmen helped by “gun control”, you need to
    get hold of the evidence as presented in “Gun Control”: Gateway to
    Tyranny. You can then challenge the media, the most aggressive backers of
    “gun control”. Ask media personalities in your city or town why they
    back Nazi based laws. You can help to erase “gun control”, Hitler’s
    last legacy.

    GCA ’68 puts your life at risk right now. You have a constitutional civil right
    to be armed in order to protect yourself, because under U.S law the police have
    no duty to protect the average person:

    “There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state (or
    Federal) against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the
    state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does not
    violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any
    other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative
    liberties: it tells the state (gov’t) to let people alone; it does not require
    the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a
    service as maintaining law and order”

    (Bowers v. DeVito, U.S., Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 686F.2d 616
    [1982]).

    See also U.S. Supreme Court cases of Will
    v. Michigan State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989) and DeShaney v. Winnebago
    County Board of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989) (State has no duty to
    protect its citizens from each other).

    The Supreme Court last dealt with this issue in 1856; the 1982 decision
    states the position in modern language. The laws of virtually every state
    parallel federal law (see JPFO Special Report “Dial 911 and Die!” covered in
    Guns & Ammo, July 1992). This has been so ever since the Constitution was
    adopted in 1791. As a result, the framers of the Second Amendment deliberately created
    (guaranteed) an individual civil right to be armed. It is your only reliable
    defense against criminals. GCA ’68 ties your hands and keeps you from carrying
    out your legal duty to ensure your own self defense. GCA ’68 thus undermines a
    pillar of U.S.
    law and helps criminals to kill law abiding Americans. Hitler would be pleased.

    Thus, GCA ’68 marked a new approach to “gun control”. It replaced the
    Federal Firearms Act (June 30, 1938), which was based on the federal power to
    regulate interstate commerce. The 1938 law required firearms dealers to get a
    federal license (which then cost $1). Only dealers could ship firearms across
    state lines. Ordinary people could receive shipments from dealers.

    In GCA ’68 the government required that in almost all cases only dealers could
    send and receive firearms across state lines. This ended “mail order”
    sales of firearms by law abiding persons who are not licensed dealers. GCA ’68
    hits you even harder. Congress gave federal bureaucrats in Washington D.C.,
    the power to decide what kinds of firearms you can own. The framers of GCA ’68
    borrowed an idea — that certain firearms are “hunting weapons” –
    from the Nazi Weapons Law (Section 21 and Section 32 of the Regulations, page
    61 and page 73, respectively, of “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny).
    The equivalent U.S.
    term, “sporting purpose,” was used to classify firearms. But it was
    not defined anywhere in GCA ’68. Thus, bureaucrats were empowered to ban whole
    classes of firearms. They have, in fact, done so.

    We wanted to know the source of these new ideas. On reading “Dial 911 and
    Die!” a JPFO member told us he had seen an article — by Alan Stang in
    ‘Review of the News,’ October 4, 1967 (pages 15-20) — the author of which felt
    that the Nazi Weapons Law was the model for GCA ’68. We found the article. But
    Stang did not reproduce the Nazi law, so we could not check his conclusions.

    We started to hunt for the text of the Nazi Weapons Law. We eventually found
    it, in the law library of an Ivy League university.

    Until 1943-44, the German government published its laws and regulations in the
    ‘Reichsgesetzblatt,’ roughly the equivalent of the U.S. Federal Register.
    Carefully shelved by law librarians, the 1938 issues of this German government
    publication had gathered a lot of dust. In the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ issue for
    the week of March 21, 1938, was the official text of the Weapons Law (March 18,
    1938). It gave Hitler’s Nazi party a stranglehold on the Germans, many of whom
    did not support the Nazis. We found that the Nazis did not invent “gun
    control” in Germany.
    The Nazis inherited gun control and then perfected it: they invented handgun
    control.

    The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April
    13, 1928. The 1928 law was enacted by a center-right, freely elected German
    government that wanted to curb “gang activity,” violent street fights
    between Nazi party and Communist party thugs. All firearm owners and their
    firearms had to be registered. Sound familiar? “Gun control” did not
    save democracy in Germany.
    It helped to make sure that the toughest criminals, the Nazis, prevailed.

    The Nazis inherited lists of firearm owners and their firearms when they
    ‘lawfully’ took over in March 1933. The Nazis used these inherited registration
    lists to seize privately held firearms from persons who were not
    “reliable.” Knowing exactly who owned which firearms, the Nazis had
    only to revoke the annual ownership permits or decline to renew them.

    In 1938, five years after taking power, the Nazis enhanced the 1928 law. The
    Nazi Weapons Law introduced handgun control. Firearms ownership was restricted
    to Nazi party members and other “reliable” people.

    The 1938 Nazi law barred Jews from businesses involving firearms. On November
    10. 1938 — one day after the Nazi party terror squads (the SS) savaged
    thousands of Jews, synagogues and Jewish businesses throughout Germany — new
    regulations under the Weapons Law specifically barred Jews from owning any
    weapons, even clubs or knives.

    Given the parallels between the Nazi Weapons Law and the GCA ’68, we concluded
    that the framers of the GCA ’68 — lacking any basis in American law to sharply
    cut back the civil rights of law abiding Americans — drew on the Nazi Weapons
    Law of 1938.

    Finding the Nazi Weapons Law whetted our appetite. We wanted to know who
    implanted this Nazi cancer in America.
    We began by probing the backgrounds of lawmakers who championed “gun
    control”. We focused on those whose bills became part of GCA ’68. GCA ’68
    as enacted closely tracks proposals dating to August 1963. We felt that if the
    culprit were a lawmaker — or a congressional staffer — he or she would know Germany, German
    law and possibly even speak German. He or she probably would have spent time in
    Germany
    on business or during military service. Alternatively, if the culprit were not
    a member of Congress or a staffer, there would be testimony at the hearings to
    that effect.

    Most potential suspects were quickly eliminated; they had no apparent ties to Germany. But
    one lawmaker caught our attention.

    An old “Who’s Who” entry showed he had been a senior member of the U.S. team that prosecuted German war criminals
    at Nuremberg in
    1945-46. Thus, he had lived in Germany
    just after the Nazi period. His official duties required him to look at Nazi
    records, including Nazi laws. In 1963 he led the effort to greatly expand the
    Federal Firearms Act of 1938.

    We then got a break. We told a legal scholar of our findings. He was intrigued.
    He sent us an extract from the record of hearings held a few months prior to
    the enactment of GCA ’68. At the end of June 1968, the Senate Judiciary
    Subcommittee to investigate Juvenile Delinquency — chaired by Thomas J. Dodd
    (D-CT) — held hearings on bills: (1) “To Require the Registration of
    Firearms” (S.3604). (2) “To Disarm Lawless Persons” (S.3634) and
    (3) “To Provide for the Establishment of a National Firearms
    Registry” (S.3637), among others.

    U.S. Representative John Dingell (D-MI) testified at these Senate hearings on
    “gun control”. Senator Joseph D. Tydings (D-MD) chaired some of these
    hearings, in Dodd’s absence.

    Rep. Dingell expressed concern that if firearms registration were required, it
    might lead to confiscation of firearms, as had happened in Nazi Germany.
    Tydings angrily accused Rep. Dingell of using “scare tactics”:

    “Are you inferring that our system here, gun registration or licensing,
    would in any way be comparable to the Nazi regime in Germany, where they had a
    secret police, and a complete takeover?”

    Rep. Dingell backed away.

    (Hearings before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency of the
    Committee on the Judiciary, 90th Congress, 2nd Session, June 26, 27 and 28 and
    July 8, 9 and 10. 1968, pp. 479-80, 505-6 cited as Subcommittee Hearings.)

    Tydings later inserted into the hearing record various documents,
    “concerning the history of Nazism and gun confiscation.”

    Exhibit No. 62 (see reproduction) is fascinating. This letter — dated July 12,
    1968 — is to Subcommittee Chairman Dodd from Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian at
    the Library of Congress. Coffin wrote:

    ” … we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weapons of
    March 18, 1938, prepared by Dr. William Solyom-Fekete of [the European Law
    Division -- ed.] as well as the Xerox of the original German text which you
    supplied” (Subcommittee Hearings, p. 489, emphasis added).

    This letter makes it public knowledge that at the end of June 1968 — 4 months
    before GCA ’68 was enacted — Senator Thomas J. Dodd, now deceased, personally
    owned a copy of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law.

    Why did Dodd own the original German text of any Nazi law? Why did he make
    known that he owned it?

    The Library of Congress then had (and still has) the ’Reichsgesetzblatt’ in its
    collection. The Library of Congress translator, Dr. Solyom-Fekete, could easily
    have used the Library of Congress’ own copy.

    Any member of Congress who wanted to read the Nazi Weapons Law need only have
    asked for it to be produced from the shelves of the Library of Congress and for
    it to be translated by Library of Congress experts. Why should any member of
    Congress ever have owned the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law?

    Without access to Tom Dodd’s personal papers, archived under his heirs’
    control, we unfortunately cannot offer definite answers.

    Dodd could have acquired the German text of the Nazi Weapons Law during his
    time at Nuremberg.
    But he had no need to do so.

    Dodd did not personally handle the prosecution of Nazi Interior Minister
    Wilhelm Frick, who signed the Nazi Weapons Law. The case against Frick was
    presented by Robert M.W. Kempner, Assistant Trial Counsel for the United States
    (see ’Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military
    Tribunal,’ cited as TMWC, Vol. V, pp. 352-67, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947).

    Nor should the Nazi Weapons Law otherwise have come to Dodd’s attention. The
    Nazi Weapons Law was not used as evidence against Frick (see Kempner’s speech,
    TMWC, V, pp. 352-67 and ‘Index of Laws, Decrees, Orders, Directives, and the
    Administration of Justice in Nazi Germany and Nazi Dominated Countries’, TMWC,
    Vol. XXIII, pp. 430-33). The Nazi Weapons Law is not listed among documents
    submitted as evidence to the Tribunal by the American prosecutors (see Vol.
    XXIV, pp. 98-169).

    The prosecutors at Nuremberg
    doubtless knew of the Nazi Weapons Law. They probably saw it in the
    ’Reichsgesetzblatt.’ On the same day that Nazi Interior Minister Frick signed
    the Weapons Law, March 18, 1938, he signed another law governing security
    measures in newly annexed Austria.
    This law concerning Austria appeared in the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ — directly in
    front of the Weapons Law — and was introduced into evidence at Nuremberg
    (’Reichsgesetzblatt’ 1938, I, p. 262; the Nazi Weapons Law was published in the
    same volume, p. 265; see TMWC, Vol. V, p.358 for reference to law concerning
    Austria).

    Thus, the Nazi Weapons Law appeared to have no historical merit at Nuremberg and should not
    have attracted anyone’s notice, certainly not to the extent of causing anyone
    to want to keep a copy of it as a separate document.

    If Dodd got his copy of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law during
    his time at Nuremberg, it likely was part of a collection of documents, for
    example, issues of the ’Reichsgesetzblatt’.

    But if he acquired the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law after his
    service at Nuremberg,
    he must have done so for a very specific reason. The Nazi Weapons Law plainly
    did not figure at Nuremberg.

    We may safely conclude it had little, if any, interest for those interested in
    the history of the Nazis’ rise to power. For example, the Nazi Weapons Law is
    not mentioned at all in William L. Shirer’s very thorough study of Nazi
    Germany, ’The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich’ (Simon and Schuster, New York,
    1950).

    At the hearings held by Dodd’s subcommittee at the end of June 1968, Rep.
    Dingell had objected to the firearms registration provision then being
    discussed. Dodd may have offered his copy of the Nazi Weapons Law to show that
    the specific proposal did not resemble anything in the Nazi law.

    He may not have realized that he was revealing a broader truth; that the whole
    fabric of GCA ’68 was based on the Nazi Weapons Law, even if the specific
    registration proposal was not so based.

    Alternatively, Dodd may not have cared whether or not anyone knew that he had
    the German text of the Nazi Weapons Law. He doubtless knew that months would
    pass before the hearing record was printed and so generally available for
    scrutiny. Thus, even if anyone then noticed the parallels between the two laws,
    the bill would already have become law.

    Rep. Dingell does not appear to have pursued the matter: the firearms
    registration provision was not included in GCA ’68. The Congress was stampeded
    on “gun control” by public enthusiasm. Martin Luther King had been
    murdered on April 4, 1968, and Robert F. Kennedy had been murdered on June 6,
    1968.

    We are not the first to have seen this hearing record. But we appear to be the
    first to have recognized its importance. This hearing record suggests strongly
    that the late Senator Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) himself implanted the Nazi Weapons
    Law into American law, or, at very least, helped others to do so.

    Now you know the ugly truth about the roots of GCA ’68. But you need to see –
    with your own eyes — the hard evidence of the Nazi roots of “gun
    control” in America
    presented in “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny.

    If you want to destroy “gun control”, you can use this book to do it.

    The Nazi Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, cleared the way for World War II and
    Nazi genocide against the Jews, Gypsies and 7,000,000 other people.

    The 1938 Nazi Weapons Law that disarmed, enslaved & murdered the men above,
    is alive and well in the United States, and is called, “The Gun Control
    act of 1968″, and is enforced by the modern day Gestapo, known as the
    “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE).”

  • deebar

    It is not that hard to confiscate weapons . Not only the TSA , DHS , Ocraps own army and countless others along with the Sheriffs that owe the Feds and police and the list is long, trust me they can do it . A gun behind every blade of grass isn’t going to do it because the people are not prepared for anything let alone trying to fight for their rights .

    Quarantine the city and you got em’ , lock stock and barrel so to speak .

    I saw numbers that had our hunters being the largest standing army in the world ! What that says to me is there are a lot of guns but no where close to being an army .
    Almost every Sheriff in the 3000 Counties has received big time money to upgrade their departments . Whose side do you suppose they’re on and Police as well . Our huge (100 miles x about 75 ) County has only 40,000 people and received close to a half billion dollars ! In trade we got a 32 million dollar DHS complex and will have about a thousand Border Patrol agents on our Northern border ! Those Canuks are a pretty vicious bunch.
    Our Military have been handpicked for years as have our Generals . Just don’t tell me that they are not prepared to follow Ocrap .

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joel-Garcia/1305544986 Joel Garcia

    Does a ban on handguns and assault weapons work? Look at Mexico. They ban all weapons. Look at Chicago. Over 500 murdered in 2012, mostly with handguns. Most multiple shootings occur in states with gun bans. In Texas we have a law allowing concealed handgun licenses. Our city is the safest city in the USA, with over 14,000 CHLs. Across the border is the most violent city in the Americas with over 11,000 killed in the last 6 years. mostly with assault weapons, and with strict gun control laws. In England, they passed laws banning guns. The bad guys went wild, with armed assaults and home invasions. Now the Bobbies (their version of cops), who traditionally did not carry firearms, are now armed, to protect themselves and the public. So you figure.

  • meglvsjc

    come one this web site is kinda becoming a bit rag like and I am a conservative. Do you think possibly the numbers could have been worse, if not for the ban? I understand about protecting our freedoms but lets have more facts and less opinions Mr Giles.

  • jimpeel

    Don’t try to confuse them with facts. Their minds are made up.

  • USAmerican100

    The only “assault weapon” is Feinstein and other gun grabbers, they are assaulting our freedoms. The semi-automatic firearms they want to ban are actually Liberty Weapons, possessed by law abiding citizens to stop tyrants from squashing our liberties.

  • E-man

    Thank you for the informative article – great work!

    I highly recommend that you guys link to the Virginia Citizens Defense Legue (VCDL). They have been doing amazing work on our (VA gun owners) behalf for many years.
    http://www.vcdl.org/
    God bless!

ISLAMIC JEW-HATRED: The Crescent Moon Rising
I WOULD HAVE SHOT HIM: Dear Reader, What Would You Have Done If You Were In This Man’s Shoes?
Load more