The Appropriately Named “Dick Act of 1902″ Forbids Gun Control

Screen Shot 2013-01-22 at 9.14.57 AMThe Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.


  • Erica

    Wow. I had no idea. Great name too!

  • Jim Wiseman

    I’m 50. Can I get a waiver?

  • 9Spoon9

    OLD NEWS that needs ‘Headline’ coverage at least 3 times a week through all media outlets! Don’t really require it in my humble opinion, yet it is another branch on the Tree of Liberty that supports private gun ownership. The Second Amendment is very clear about citizens’ ownership of firearms.

    ‘Leftists’ must admit and submit to the FACTS. Restrictive policies in regard to firearms serves only the criminal element and a purpose of a government with tyrannical intentions. Truthful history tells us that tens of millions have been exterminated once they people were disarmed. Maybe that is part and parcel of the NWO’s game plan. Sir David Attenborough probably hit the nail directly on the head when he spoke that MANKIND IS THE BLIGHT UPON EARTH and that the intentions of Obama and his co-conspirators is to significantly decrease the planets human populace in order to save Mother Earth. KUDOS to him for publicly stating his empirical theory.

    GOD Bless America!

  • Arthur mackey

    It is a long forgotten act that is still in force and can be used as a proper defense in courts !

  • Terry C

    That will be the day. Someone in Congress actually taking their Oath of Office in which they swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States seriously and actually doing it.

  • Buck

    Now we need a law with teeth providing for imprisonment of all legislators that submit bills for passage that are in violation of the constitution and bill of rights .

  • egalicki

    I wonder if any legislators or administration loonies know about this – someone should put it on a lead projectile and send it to their attention.

  • joerosey

    It would be nice to see a copy of the act itself and not what others think it says…legal terminology is VERY important

  • Dempseycoleman

    In this day and age who in the Republican Party has the
    Balls to even mention a Law that might stop Obama on
    doing Anything? Every Damn one in DC. needs Jailed.

  • MadMax327

    We must keep Military Style Weapons out of the hands of “Unstable” people, this is a no brainer. However, if we intend to keep guns away from law abiding American Citizens, how can we then turn around and give, not sell, G I V E, 200 XM-1 Abrams Tanks and a number of F – 16 Fighter Jets to Egypt? Certainly it is unstable, and they only have one “Sworn Enemy” in the region, that being our long time friend Israel. We know that they have no scruples when it comes to turning such weapons on their own Civilian Populations, schools get destroyed as collateral damage, (making Sandy Hook look like a Holiday). Hundreds of death penalty warrants for “riots at a soccer game”, and for protesting the Moressi administration. While we are at it why don’t we throw in a few, a dozen ICBM’s, and I am sure the would make positive use out of a carrier or two and a few submarines. But I can’t own a 30 round magazine, a 45 or AR-15. God Bless America?
    Totus Tuus! ! !
    Airborne/All the Way

The latest from