What’s worse — the fact that the Hildebeest’s jacket cost more than most of her followers’ cars or the fact that Hillary’s jacket costs that much and still looks like a potato sack? Not-so-poor Killary didn’t realize that the internet would quickly catch on to her blatant hypocrisy.
You would think someone would say: "Hey, Hillary, maybe don't give this speech on inequality wearing a $12k jacket" https://t.co/pTGFlW6BdD
— Sarah Westwood (@sarahcwestwood) June 6, 2016
— #BernieOrBust (@BerninForBernie) June 7, 2016
— Sean Spicer (@seanspicer) June 6, 2016
Hillary Clinton’s New York primary victory speech in April focused on topics including income inequality, job creation and helping people secure their retirement. It was a clear attempt to position herself as an everywoman.
But an everywoman she is not — she gave the speech in a $12,495 Giorgio Armani tweed jacket.
The polished outfit was a stark contrast to the fashion choices Clinton has made in the past. As first lady, Clinton wore frumpy pastel skirtsuits. As New York senator and secretary of state, she attempted a more serious look, wearing pantsuits in a rainbow of colors — so mocked that they sparked memes. In comparison to Michelle Obama, who’s become known as a style icon during her time in the White House and appeared on the cover of Vogue twice, Clinton has never been able to nail down a personal aesthetic that works for her.
Read more: NY Post