LIARS: 12 Examples Of How The Media (D) KNEW Obama Was Spying On Trump — And Covered It Up

The Media (D) wants to have its cake and eat it, too.

In a brilliant piece on the Daily Wire, John Nolte lays out the case against the Media (D) and how their bias led them to cover up for the Obama Administration’s spying. Because Barry can do no wrong in their eyes.

For months the Media (D) had been benefiting from the surveillance and the recently relaxed information-sharing that Obama put in place in the waning days of his term.

From The Daily Wire article:

Our national media has known for months that the Obama administration spied on Team Trump. This was not only common knowledge within the media community, it was no secret. In fact, as you’ll see below, for two big reasons, the media was overjoyed that this spying had occurred: (1) they got scoops damaging to Trump, and (2) in their provincial and cultish minds, the very fact that the oh-so pure Obama administration felt the need to spy, could only mean Trump was in bed with Putin.

In fact, the media was actually having a big public party using Obama’s spying. Hoo-hah here’s a scoop! Whee-hee Flynn said this! Woo-woo palace intrigue! Ha-haaah here’s what so-and-so said! Tra-la-la here’s what so-and-so did!

But then Trump did something that the Media (D) couldn’t abide.

In a series of tweets on March 4, Trump acknowledged what the Media (D) was already saying, but he exposed the actions of the Obama Administration as the shady and illegal act of spying.

The Media (D) was now up sh-t creek with no paddle in sight. There were many articles and reporting that referenced this intelligence to try to make the Trump-Russia connection stick. But now — gasp! — Barry may have actually done something unethical.

Off they went to defend President Barack Hussein Obama from the truth that they had been espousing for months attacks against his Character by President Trump. And you have to side with Barry against Trump because Trump is so obviously a villain — look at all the yet-to-be-found ties to Putin!

1. Heat Street — November 7, 2016

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.

The New York Times confirmed this information on March 17, 2017.

2. The Guardian — January 11, 2017

The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The Fisa court turned down the application asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation.

3. The New York Times — January 12, 2017.

This is huge. The Obama administration expanded the power of the NSA to share intercepted communication and share with 16 other intelligence agencies.

In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.

The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Essentially, this move by the Obama administration allowed 16 government agencies to see the raw information before blacking out identification markers of individuals. You know, the kind of thing protected by the Fourth Amendment.

So, unredacted information would now be spread to so many agencies ensuring a greater likelihood of leaks to the Media (D).

4. The BBC — January 17, 2017

Lawyers from the National Security Division in the Department of Justice then drew up an application. They took it to the secret US court that deals with intelligence, the Fisa court, named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They wanted permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks.

Their first application, in June, was rejected outright by the judge. They returned with a more narrowly drawn order in July and were rejected again. Finally, before a new judge, the order was granted, on 15 October, three weeks before election day.

Neither Mr Trump nor his associates are named in the Fisa order, which would only cover foreign citizens or foreign entities – in this case the Russian banks. But ultimately, the investigation is looking for transfers of money from Russia to the United States, each one, if proved, a felony offence.

A lawyer – outside the Department of Justice but familiar with the case – told me that three of Mr. Trump’s associates were the subject of the inquiry. “But it’s clear this is about Trump,” he said.

5. McClatchy — January 18, 2017

The agencies involved in the inquiry are the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Justice Department, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and representatives of the director of national intelligence, the sources said. …

A key mission of the six-agency group has been to examine who financed the email hacks of the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The London-based transparency group WikiLeaks released the emails last summer and in October.

The working group is scrutinizing the activities of a few Americans who were affiliated with Trump’s campaign or his business empire and of multiple individuals from Russia and other former Soviet nations.

The BBC reported that the FBI had obtained a warrant on Oct. 15 from the highly secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court allowing investigators access to bank records and other documents about potential payments and money transfers related to Russia. One of McClatchy’s sources confirmed the report.

6. The New York Times — January 19, 2017.

Print headline: “Wiretapped Data Used In Inquiry of Trump Aides” …

The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.

7. The Washington Post — February 9, 2017.

Headline: “National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador, despite denials, officials say”

National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country’s ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said.

Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election.

The Media (D) got its first scalp here with the resignation of Gen. Michael Flynn, and were cheering.

But the niggling little fact is this information was obviously obtained by spying… a month before the handover from Obama to Trump.

8. CNN — February 14, 2017.

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius cited a single “senior U.S. government official” while reporting that “Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, the day the Obama administration announced the expulsion of 35 Russian officials as well as other measures in retaliation for the hacking.” …

Last Thursday, The Post cited “nine current and former officials” in a story headlined “National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador, despite denials, officials say.”

The New York Times quickly matched the story and said there was a transcript of the discussions.

The chronology suggests that some officials in the government sought to alert the public to Flynn’s contacts by leaking to the press.

Flynn’s phone calls appear to be monitored here… even if he wasn’t the target of the FISA warrant and it was the Russian ambassador that was being watched, Flynn’s name wasn’t redacted as required by law.

CNN has since repeatedly called President Trump a liar for saying that he was wiretapped by Obama.

ClashDaily has a related article you can read here.

The last 4 are reports that confirm that the Media (D) knew that the Obama administration was listening to Flynn’s phone calls:

9. NBC News — February 10, 2017.

10. The Associated Press — February 10, 2017.

11. ABC News — February 13, 2017.

12. CBS News — February 10, 2017.

Way back in January, Heat Street, The Guardian, The BBC, and McClatchy all confirmed that he Obama administration sought and/or received surveillance warrants aimed at Team Trump.

Nolte’s article brilliantly ties everything together, and here is his summary:

Way back in January, The New York Times reported that the Obama White House was looking at wiretap intelligence related to Trump.

Way back in February, The Washington Post, CNN, the Associated Press, NBC News, CBS News, and ABC News all gleefully reported on private telephone calls that were surveilled by the Obama administration and then illegally made public to the media.

Then, In March, just weeks after all of this reporting on the awesomeness of Obama-era surveillance warrants and intercepted phone calls …

Despite their own knowledge, despite their own reporting, despite the words they publicly printed and the words they publicly spoke, every single one of these news outlets declared Trump a liar for the sin of what …?

For the sin of believing the same people now smearing him as a liar.

Share if you think that the Media (D) is trying to have it both ways on this one — using the info, but still shielding Obama from allegations of obviously illegal activity

Like Clash? Like Clash.

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.