Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

GovernmentNews Clash

Democrats Not Getting Their Way Fast Enough: Reid Still Threatening Nuclear Option


By MANU RAJU, JOHN  BRESNAHAN and BURGESS EVERETT | 7/11/13 7:19 PM EDT Updated: 7/12/13  11:56 PM EDT

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s threat to change filibuster rules is  supposed to narrowly focus on presidential nominees to the executive branch.

But his potential move to invoke the “nuclear option” is raising a bigger and  more sweeping question that could have huge consequences for future presidents  of both parties: Is this the beginning of the end of the filibuster? If the  filibuster goes, the Senate would lose a crucial check on majority rights — and  it could start looking very much like the House, where the majority always gets  its way.

For years, the filibuster has been increasingly used as a tool to block, delay  and frustrate the will of the majority party to push through its agenda. While the filibuster has been changed periodically over the years,  senators have never successfully made good on their threat to impose the  “nuclear option” — changing Senate cloture rules by 51 votes, rather than 67 —  for fear it would hurt them one day when they were back in the minority.

But those days may now be over.

On Monday, Reid informed President Barack Obama about his intention to use  the nuclear option if no deal is struck, sources said, and Obama signaled he  would support the effort.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who is trying to head off the  high-stakes fight, privately reached out to Vice President Joe Biden, but it’s  expected that Biden would vote with Democrats in case there’s a 50-50 tie.

The crisis could still be averted. Reid signaled that he would drop the  threat of the nuclear option if Republicans ended their filibusters on pending  Obama nominees.

But senators in both parties agreed Thursday that if Reid moves to change the  rules by 51 votes, it would be used by the majority in the future to further  weaken the filibuster, potentially eliminating the potent procedural weapon  altogether one day. While Democrats said they were willing to roll the dice on  the nuclear option, believing the GOP would go that route anyway when they get  back in the majority, Republicans said Reid’s move all but assured a continued  weakening — and eventual demolition — of the filibuster.

But Reid said privately it is time to make a change.

In a closed-door caucus meeting Thursday, Reid began by apologizing to his  colleagues for cutting bipartisan deals to avert the nuclear option, including  at the beginning of this year. And the Nevada Democrat complained that he  allowed votes on scores of conservative nominees under former President George  W. Bush after a bipartisan coalition headed off the nuclear option in 2005. But  Reid said it had been the right thing to do because Bush had won a second term  in the White House.

Now, Reid argued, times have changed.

“I ate sh— on some of those nominees,” Reid told his colleagues, according to  sources who were present.

On Thursday, the Senate continued to inch closer to a battle that could have  dramatic implications for the institution.

“I don’t know how you open that door and not go to the next level. First,  it’s executive nominations, next thing it’ll be judicial nominations, then it  will be legislative filibusters,” said South Dakota Sen. John Thune, the No. 3  Senate Republican. “The precedent they set here will be not only long-lasting  but far-reaching.”

Read More