Obama Administration Has Gone Rogue Says Judge Napolitano

Published on October 10, 2013

By Andrew P. Napolitano

Before you rejoice that the government has seized an alleged terrorist in Libya who was indicted for planning the notorious 1998  U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, before you  join the House of  Representatives in a standing ovation for the Capitol  Hill police who killed a woman whose car struck a White  House fence and who then drove away at a high speed, and before you commend  the New York Police Department for quickly getting to the bottom of an alleged assault by a motorcycle gang  that tormented a young family on a city street, please give some thought to the  rule of law.

Last weekend, a team of Navy SEALs kidnapped a  Libyan, Abu Anas al-Libi, off of a  public street in Tripoli. The Navy men did not have  a warrant for his arrest, did not have the permission of the local authorities  or the Libyan government to carry out  this kidnapping, and were unlawfully present bearing arms in public in Libya.  Many of al-Libi’s alleged accomplices  already had been arrested, prosecuted and convicted in the United States. The  U.S. could have sought his extradition, as it did with some of them, had  President Obama not bombed the American-friendly government of Col.  Moammar Gadhafi out of existence, without a congressional declaration of  war.

Obama apologists have praised this maneuver as a bloodless way to obtain  justice without using drones to kill. (How low we have sunk when Mr. Obama can  be praised for not executing someone with a drone.) Secretary of State John  F. Kerry, acknowledging that al-Libi is innocent until proved guilty, has claimed that the rule of law was followed  here because he will be brought to a civilian U.S.  court for trial. Former George W. Bush administration Attorney General Michael B.  Mukasey claimed that because the embassy bombings constituted an act of war,  the kidnapping of al-Libi was a lawful  wartime assault, and he should be tried before a military tribunal.

It borders on the ridiculous for Mr.  Kerry to profess fidelity to the rule of law when this criminal gambit was  anything but. Fact: We are not at war with Libya.  Fact: We cannot lawfully — under international law, American law or Libyan law —  engage in law enforcement or offensive operations in Libya without the express consent of the local and  national authorities. Fact: As a defendant in federal court in the 2nd Circuit,  al-Libi must be brought to a federal  judge in New York City within 48 hours of his arrest.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for him in lower Manhattan, as the feds will  “debrief” al-Libi aboard ship before  turning him over to federal prosecutors for trial. One can only imagine what  that debriefing will be like. It will no doubt consist of torture. That’s why  the interrogation is being conducted on the high seas, where the government will claim it is free to disobey any federal law. That’s why the Geneva  Conventions prohibit housing prisoners of war aboard ship.

What kind of government seeks venues in which it can break the law? One that  has forgotten that every time Mr. Bush made  his extraterritorial argument to the Supreme Court, it was rejected. Wherever  the American government goes and whatever it does, it remains subject to the  confines of the Constitution.

Not to worry, administration sources claim, the FBI won’t learn of whatever  beans al-Libi spills while the CIA is  simulating his drowning. Wrong again. While no federal court will admit evidence  obtained under torture, the Patriot Act — that monstrosity that permits federal  agents to write their own search warrants and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance  Act court judges to evade the Constitution — requires intelligence interrogators  and law enforcement interrogators to share information — even the results of  torture. So much for the presumption of innocence, the right to a lawyer, the  right to remain silent, the right to be brought before a judge, and the rule of  law.

Read More