I like to refer to Islam as equivalent to the Manson Family on a global scale. Just how accurate is that? Let’s take a look.
Ali Sina is a renowned ex-Muslim author, and founder of FaithFreedom.org. He writes,
“I see Muhammed as a psychopath and Allah was nothing but his own alter-ego. He invented this bugaboo deity to fool people and ride them. Allah is no god and even if he was, Muhammed did not receive any revelations from him. Muhammed was a deranged man. He concocted this whole lie to fool people. He was no different than Jim Jones, David Koresh or Charles Manson. Mohammed was a ruthless man – a false prophet. He made people hate each other. He divided them so he could conquer them.”
As for Charles Manson, his cult was ultimately oriented around “Helter Skelter” — Manson’s hallucinogenic-fueled vision of an apocalyptic race war, driven by messages he found in both the Beatles’ music and in the Biblical book of Revelation, in which blacks, and especially black Muslims, would ultimately kill off virtually all whites except for the Manson Family, who would then rise up from hiding to rule over the remaining black population. The Manson Family’s murder spree was intended to trigger “Helter Skelter.”
The only real difference I find between Manson and Mohammed is that the Manson Family was stopped in time, after their several early murders, and before Manson really got his movement going very widely, whereas Mohammed got his movement going much more widely(acting with minimum or non-aggression at first) before growing more powerful and really starting to rampage and murder people in order to terrorize, subjugate, and bring even more under Islam’s brutal reign by force.
Unfortunately, Mohammed was obviously not stopped in time, and Islam’s influence has grown over the centuries to where it now counts over a billion adherents on this planet. It’s plain to honest observers that only the small percentage on the leading edge of Islam’s march are the actively violent ones, while the hundreds of millions of their rear-echelon support staff and families act mainly as spiritual, financial, and logistical support — or, are merely dragged along, in the cultural sense.
Manson was stopped also because of the advanced civilization in which he preached his psychotic visions and commanded his murderous followers — a comparatively technologically-developed society which, even in the California of fourty-five years ago, had a unified, highly sophisticated, constitutional system of jurisprudence and law enforcement, with telephone networks, highways, cars, and early police computer databases.
Mohammed’s 7th-century Arabian milieu was, of course, quite primitive and tribal, lending itself that much more to the rapid spread of a dangerous totalitarian quasi-religious cult based on a delusional, megalomaniac personality, who bided his time until his numbers were sufficient to “strike terror into the hearts(Qur’an 8:60)” of his opponents.
Mohammed’s Jim Jones-like early influence and maniacal rantings were strongly opposed, at first, by powerful members of the Quraysh tribe from which he and his family originated, however he was able to eventually prevail against his opponents in numerous fierce, bloody battles, destroying any and all who stood in his way, resulting in complete regional domination by his new cult, Islam.
Both Manson and Mohammed started out as charismatic spiritual gurus who captured the imaginations and abject loyalties of some of their respective societies’ members, with their new, dark, self-invented twists on pre-existing cultural and religious elements.
Manson started preaching and attracting followers in the Haight-Ashbury hippie haven of San Francisco during the “Summer of Love” period in the late 1960s. His message and philosophy was a mixture of science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard’s own invented cult-religion, Scientology, and of the dual Christ/Satan-worship found in the burgeoning “Process Church of the Final Judgement”(a shunned splinter group from Scientology) of that time.
Mohammed, on the other hand, after marrying a well-off merchant dowager 15 years his senior, went on a meditative sojourn into a cave, from whence he emerged claiming to have been visited by the archangel Gabriel, and alleged to have received revelations that he was to bethe prophet of Allah. Prior to this, Allah had been regarded as one of many gods(albeit one of the highest gods) in the pagan worship practices of the Arabian tribes.
Mohammed began insisting that he had been chosen to whip everyone, including those from the Abrahamic faiths of Judaism and Christianity(called the “people of the book” by Muslims), into shape under the totalitarian rule and iron hand of his new religion, which he called Islam, on behalf of his Allah.
So here we are, so many hundreds of years later. Mohammed’s savage warlord legacy of murder and mayhem continues on, helped along with stubborn interference(against those of us who would stomp out terrorism for good) on its behalf by countless fools and knaves such as George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and assorted other multiculturalist dhimmis and stealth agents in high places who falsely insist that Islam, true Islam, is peaceful. Of course it is not.
Along with the physical evidence of constant Islamic aggression and brutality, additional proof is found in Islam’s documents, the Koran, Hadith, and Sira, which are rife with passages commanding Muslims to terrorize, subjugate, and slaughter non-Muslims.
There is one passage, though, to which many of the aforementioned dhimmis and deliberate deceivers like to adamantly point when describing Islam as peaceful. Yet even that imaginary scripture is used to distort and deceive — because those quoting it never actually give you the complete, actual version from the Koran.
The version they give you, which does not even exist in any translation of the Koran, goes like this:
“If anyone slays a person, it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people.” (by the way, those words happen to be lifted directly from a preexisting Jewish text — Mishnah, IV division 5)
Again, that passage cannot be found in any copy of the Koran anywhere. Often, those promoting it insert “innocent” in front of “person” — which only makes debunking it easier, because the trick lies in just who Islam deems innocent! As for that, take a wild guess. You got it! According to Islam, only Muslims can be innocent.
The actual verse is Qur’an 5:32, and it is as follows:
“On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone slew a person – unless it be for retaliation for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew all mankind: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all humanity.”
Notice that here is proscribed conduct not for Muslims, but for “the Children of Israel,” and that according to Islam, “spreading mischief in the land” can mean anything that is not deemed completely in obedience to Allah, including merely being non-Muslim!
Oh, and the very next verse, Qur’an 5:33, is conveniently omitted by Obama when he deploys his taqiyya on us:
“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;”
In the aftermath of the Sept. 11th, 2012 terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and their cronies all falsely blamed an obscure movie on YouTube titled “The Innocence of Muslims” for supposedly provoking ragheads’ murderous outrage which took the lives of our ambassador, 3 other Americans, and numerous other victims around the globe in further rampages.
Despite the cynical lies of Obama and his administration, saying the filmmaker was the culprit and then having him arrested and jailed, I decided to watch some of that video. I didn’t get very far into it before I gave up on trying to figure out the reason for its title.
As for the ongoing clash of civilizations(not really an appropriate phrase, because Islam cannot accurately be called civilization) between Islam and everyone else, I say non-Muslims are the innocent ones.