IN INDIANA, ARKANSAS, ETC: Redefining ‘Gay’ to Mean a Constant State of Rage

Written by Andrew Allen on April 3, 2015

The gayster gaystapo homonazis want to redefine “gay”. Not in the sense that LGBT now has a whole bunch of other letters tacked on the end to accommodate who knows what. But in the sense that being gay, the way they portray it, is to exist in a constant state of rage.

When are they not enraged?

As sure as Monday follows Sunday, the activists are mad about Indiana’s law. They will be mad when Arkansas follows Indiana. Then they will be mad when people stand up for Indiana and Arkansas. And when people dig into the history behind these laws. When all that is said and done the activists will seethe and snark about “religion” and denounce the notion of “church”.

So angry. So very by design.

Gay activists need to pit homosexuals against any adversary they can come up with. Religion right now makes a convenient adversary. Fostering and allowing rage to fester provides energy for their movement.

Their movement needs energy. Without it, the funding dries up and other causes edge theirs off center stage. They need to keep gays red-faced-mad at the world – or else they’ll go broke and have to get real jobs.

After all they’ve accomplished in recent years, is there much left to sustain their agenda?



Andrew Allen
Andrew Allen (@aandrewallen) grew up in the American southeast and for more than two decades has worked as an information technoloigies professional in various locations around the globe. A former far-left activist, Allen became a conservative in the late 1990s following a lengthy period spent questioning his own worldview. When not working IT-related issues or traveling, Andrew Allen spends his time discovering new ways to bring the pain by exposing the idiocy of liberals and their ideology.