Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC’s Morning Joe called Marco Rubio a “little boy”. Obviously because he’s a man of color.
It’s time we demanded an end to leftist racism. To that end:
A) MSNBC can pull Morning Joe off the air.
B) Morning Joe can fire Brzezinski and replace her with a Cuban-American male.
Fill in the blanks:
A group of _________, calling themselves _________, recently took sledgehammers and smashed up _________ saying they represented _____.
If you said radical Muslims, ISIS, ancient artifacts, cultural infidelity, you are right.
You’re also right if you said feminists, progressives, urinals in New York City, and cultural infidelity.
That’s right, radical feminists in supposedly enlightened New York City, followed the Islamic State’s example and took hammers to urinals. They did so because, according to them, male urinals represent a cultural offense and are contrary to what they believe in.
The parallels between progressivism and radical Islamists are as interesting as they are troublesome.
It isn’t the Tea Party. Nor a vast right-wing conspiracy at work. Nope. It’s all the left’s doing.
He was a man on a mission. Doug Hughes was pumped and amped. He had to send a message — literally one each for each member of Congress using a gyrocopter camouflaged to look like a mail truck. It even had a US Postal service logo on its tail section.
Doug Hughes message was a demand for campaign finance reform. A rant against the ills of dark money in our political system.
Sound like anyone familiar?
Media coverage — or the lack thereof — helps answer the question. If Doug Hughes had been a Tea Party member, his stunt would still be breaking news and above the fold. Every aspect of his existence, and that of everyone who knows him, would have been filleted for all to see. The inference of right-wing nut job terrorist would have been tucked into the talking points.
Instead, Doug Hughes has drifted quickly to the bottom of the stack. Why?
His agenda matches that of Hillary and other leading Democrats.
If Hillary is right, and the Clinton-clan was really dead broke once they moved out of the White House in 2001, what does that tell us about their ability to proactively manage their own household.
Most people forced into a career change face a short time-line to move from job A to job B.
In the Clinton’s case, they had four years to plan for it.
Around 1460 days give or take a leap year.
And the result was they left the White House destitute?
If Hillary can’t manage her own household any better than that, what business does the self-anointed champion of everyday Americans have in effecting policies that will impact millions of households?