SCIENTISTS AGREE: The Global Warming Debate Is Over, So Lock Up the Greenies Please
The debate on man-caused global warming is now over. Yes, the recent action of twenty scientists confirms the fact that dangerous warming of the planet due to man’s capitalistic activities is NOT happening. These scientists published a letter on the Institute for Global Environment and Society (IGES) website, urging President Obama and Attorney General Loretta Lynch to begin prosecution of climate change deniers under provision of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. This is the act originally used by the government to go after organized crime and later was used against the tobacco industry.
Clearly climate change proponents are now throwing in the towel on convincing the public of this hoax and are instead appealing to governmental power to silence dissent. All of the alarming rhetoric, falsified data, and constant drumbeat about the evils of capitalism have just not moved the public to accept the draconian solutions leftists need to consolidate power through this scheme.
I suspect globalist minded politicos have instructed these scientists to make this request of government as a trial balloon of some type. As I have stated in previous writings, the actions of the climate changers are going to get more frantic as we approach the United Nations Climate Change Conference at the end of November. Big global regulatory commitments are projected to come out of this conference.
During my years in engineering, we had an expression that conceptualized what scientific debate was all about: “Data talks and bull crap walks” (I cleaned it up a bit). What we’ve had from global warming proponents in the form of data IS nothing but bull crap.
We’ve had hockey stick charts that show an imaginary sharp temperature rise.
We’ve had historical temperature data actually tampered with (see here: https:// stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/19/just-hit-the-noaa-motherlode/).
We’ve had global sea ice depletion claims that are totally unfounded. While there has been some decrease in Arctic ice, the amount of Antarctic ice has increased more than enough to offset the loss of Arctic ice, confounding the global warmers’ computer models. Have you heard about that?
And of course, we’ve had political correctness unleashed labeling any dissenters from the climate change orthodoxy as deniers. The left is still really into shame.
If you have clear data to support your claims you don’t need to legislate opposing views out of existence. Scientific truth will speak for itself. It’s only when you’re perpetrating a hoax that you need to suppress and eliminate opposing explanations.
There’s more at stake though than just having our economy smothered and our monthly power bills double or triple. What if this overt use of government power was used to enforce other irrational and unfounded orthodoxies?
Suppose any dissent to a strictly materialistic, evolutionary explanation to the origin of life became a felony. The argument between evolutionists and the adherents of Intelligent Design (ID) is very analogous to the global warming debate.
Darwinism’s view of man’s origin is integral to the left’s plans for globalization and its need to devalue human life. The overwhelming evidence for ID renders the Darwinian view of the origin of life to little more than a humorous anachronism.
The late Stephen J. Gould, a Harvard evolutionary biologist and staunch Darwinian defender, in a moment of candor stated this: “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable not the evidence of fossils.”
So Darwinists are not basing their view on data, just whimsy. They want us to have evolved in an accidental way because it is morally and politically expedient for them. And this is fiercely defended on college campuses today. A professor expressing support for ID has tenure shorter than the half life of a carbon15 atom (about 2 seconds for the non-scientific). For further verification of this, check out Ben Stein’s movie Expelled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HErmp5Pzqw.
We could then easily see another group of scientists asking for government prosecution of “Darwin Deniers”.
To perfect society, the left will endeavor to perfect thoughts and opinions. Only certain ideas and concepts are beneficial to the statist utopia. Therefore, many ideas we freely hold and discuss today could become offenses of statist groupthink. Concepts like:
Life begins at conception
Objective morality exists
Men and women really are different
Profits breed innovation
Man desires freedom more than security
will have to be eliminated.
Leftist utopia and individual autonomy are diametrically opposed to each other. It is truly a zero sum game. As the perfecting utopian tide rises around us, our ability to live as freethinking agents recedes. Get engaged before it’s too late.
Image: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4175525