Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

AbortionConstitutionHealthOpinionPoliticswomen's issues

Where’s Hillary’s Compassion for THIS Group of Persons?

Speaker after speaker lauded Hillary Clinton at the convention yesterday, telling the world about her compassionate heart, and her tireless, lifelong work on behalf of women and children.

“The unborn person does not have Constitutional rights.” — HRC

So the unborn person can be killed in the womb but we don’t call that murder because HRC says that person, that human person, does not have a right to life? I wonder what other persons HRC determines have no right to life?

As to her concern for women, anybody here read the studies showing how harmful abortion is to women?

And while we are on the subject, have you noticed how mean and morally corrupt we’ve become since the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973?

Still the blood bath rolls on toward 60 million “unborn persons” slaughtered since that decision, and we call it “women’s health care”, “reproductive rights”, a difficult “choice”. Pretty difficult for the “unborn person” too, the one shredded and vacuumed, the one stabbed and thrown in the trash, the one burned by chemicals injected into the womb.

HRC insists adults have a right to make a choice to kill a baby, but the baby has no rights whatsoever.

And this is compassion?

photo credit: Hillary Clinton via photopin (license); Gage Skidmore

Share if you are horrified at Hillary’s selective compassion.

Allan Erickson

Allan Erickson---Christian, husband, father, journalist, businessman, screenwriter, and author of The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence, Tate Publishing, 2012.