Hillary’s doubtful Health… Does the Public NEED to know more?
It was once an incidental issue. But more and more, the public wants to know.
And one doctor — commenting on her medication and treatment — only made the question bigger.
59% of voters also now believe all major presidential candidates should release at least their most recent medical records to the public. That’s up dramatically from 38% in May 2014 when questions about Clinton’s health were first being raised. Thirty percent (30%) don’t think candidates should have to release their recent medical records, while 11% are undecided.
Interestingly, Democrats (62%) believe even more strongly than Republicans (58%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (57%) that presidential candidates should release their recent medial records. Most Republicans (59%) favor release of the most recent tax returns, but they’re less supportive than Democrats (77%) and unaffiliateds (63%) are. Rasmussenreports
But the American people deserve to know the health of every candidate running for president. Hillary Clinton is 68 years old, and she’s applying for the most stressful job in the world.
Today a California doctor (who lost his license as he refused to administer the anticoagulant called “Coumadin), believes Hillary Clinton’s use of that anticoagulant can be more dangerous than her recurring blood clot!
WND reported Thursday that the medication Clinton has taken since 1998 to deal with her blood-clotting problems – cerebral venous thrombosis – may have dangerous side effects. They include blurred vision and confusion – both of which she has been reported to have experienced – plus a tendency to bleed excessively even from minor injuries.
“My interest in cerebral venous thrombosis and in Hillary Clinton’s case is public health-based rather than political,” Cundiff explained to WND.
“I think that her medical risks are much more from the side effects of the Coumadin than the recurrence of a venous thrombosis.” The Political Insider