QUESTION: Who Takes The THREAT Of Islam More SERIOUSLY – Obama & Hillary Or Trump?

Published on September 19, 2016

Has Obama or Hillary (post 9/11) said the word ‘terrorism’ in a sentence without ALSO saying the word ‘not’? Especially after any sort of attack?

Exhibit A: Trump’s stance:

After 3 terror incidents over the weekend, Trump was quick to praise Law Enforcement, denounce the attack as TERRORISM and lay the blame at Obama’s feet.

“In the past 48 hours, our law enforcement showed again that, without them, our country is neither safe nor secure. I am grateful for the quick action of law enforcement in capturing the terrorist responsible for Saturday’s bombings, and the off-duty police officer for stopping the terrorist in Minnesota. This weekend’s attacks, from Minnesota to Manhattan, are just the latest to be carried out on U.S. soil under President Obama. These should be a wake-up call for every American,” Trump stated in a press release.

Trump also slammed Clinton’s reaction to the attacks, saying “she will say anything – and blame anyone – to shift attention away from the weakness she showed as Secretary of State.”

“The Obama-Clinton doctrine of not taking ISIS seriously enough has emboldened terrorists all over the world. They are hoping and praying that Hillary Clinton becomes President so that they can continue their savagery and murder,” he added…

So much for the ‘J.V. team’ Obama. (Though with your free-throw percentage, Mr. President, you should really keep away from sports analogies.)

Trump continued on, not pulling any punches:

…When I am President, terrorists like today’s suspect in the New York and New Jersey bombings, Ahmad Khan Rahami, and yesterday’s knife-wielding ISIS sympathizer in Minnesota, Dahir Adan, will be stopped. We will not look the other way. We will not allow political correctness and soft-on-terror, soft-on-crime policies to threaten our security and our lives.

Revelations that the Obama Administration wrongly granted citizenship to over 800 immigrants awaiting deportation from countries of concern to national security or high rates of immigration fraud puts this weekend’s attacks in a broader perspective. The safety and security of the homeland must be the overriding objective of our leaders when it comes to our immigration policy.

That’s why I’ve proposed extreme vetting for immigrants from troubled parts of the world where terrorists live and train, and oppose Hillary Clinton’s 550% increase in the number of refugees from the conflict in Syria. These are tough problems that require tough leadership. We need to get smart and get tough fast so that this weekend’s attacks do not become the new normal here as it has in Europe and other parts of the world.
Read more: Breitbart

Exhibit B: Obama-Hillary stance:

Barack Obama has said that Americans must remain ‘tough and resolute’ after bombings in New York and New Jersey – but stopped short of calling the bombings ‘terrorism.’

Obama, who is in New York for the UN General Assembly, said in a brief speech that the recent bombings in Manhattan and New Jersey should not cause citizens to give in to fear.

‘They want to inspire fear in all of us and disrupt the way we live, undermine our values even as we are vigilant and aggressive in preventing senseless acts of violence,’ Obama said…

…He also promised ‘continue to coordinate the drive to destroy ISIS,’ targeting leaders and infrastructure, and that he would talk to the Prime Minister of Iraq at the UN summit to work on coordinated efforts.

‘As we take their territory it shows ISIL to be the failed cause that it is,’ Obama said, explaining that the so-called ‘Islamic State’ was losing ground both in Iraq and Syria.
Read more: Daily Mail

Oh, and about terrorists coming across the southern border? Obama didn’t touch it.

Dreamers gonna dream.

Terrorists gonna sneak across the border and terrorize.

Who do YOU want in charge of America’s security?

Share if Trump’s plan to deal with terrorism is WAY better than the failed Obama-Hillary ‘plan’