National media talking heads have a lot to say about who they think would be hazardous to foreign relations … but what do actual FOREIGNERS think?
“There is a candidate who appears a lot more dangerous for France than the others – that’s Hillary Clinton,” the head of the National Front told RT France in an exclusive interview. “I’m not American so I don’t need to make a choice. But… in the interests of France, Hillary Clinton is probably the worst choice out there.”
Le Pen sees the Democratic frontrunner as being so “dangerous” because of Clinton’s career as US Secretary of State, in which she worked “hand in hand with the full spectrum of American decisions” that eventually “plunged the world objectively into chaos.”
“I think if she was elected she would continue this policy, a destructive policy, a policy of conflict, a policy of imprisonment of Europe in blinded Atlanticism,” Le Pen said. “I think it’s a danger for world peace.”
Funny, wasn’t it Trump that they said was the problem for world peace? They claim that Trump is too cozy with Putin, some alleged business dealings? (What about those 75.000 undisclosed shares, Hillary? Is that a ‘conflict of interest’?)
She would have us believe that Trump will enter into secret deals of some undefined kind with the Russians. Right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JpPU-SwcbE
Some concerns about the connections between money taken in from Russia, and the Sale of Uranium to Russia were raised.
And as for Trump running his mouth and getting us in trouble with International rivals?
Could he possibly run his mouth off worse than the guy we’ve already got? Did Biden just threaten RUSSIA?
His warning seems to suggest that Mr. Obama is prepared to order — or has already ordered — some kind of covert action after the stolen emails were published online. That would require what is known in the intelligence agencies as a finding — a presidential determination authorizing covert action.
Such a finding would allow the United States to make use of its newly developed arsenal of cyberweapons, which are under the control of the military’s Cyber Command, the N.S.A. and, in some circumstances, the C.I.A.
— NY Times
They’re understably angry with Russia because ONE nation interfering in the affairs and free elections of another nation is categorically WRONG. Isn’t It?
Headline: Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu
Headline: Barack Obama: Brexit would put UK ‘back of the queue’ for trade talks
Maybe it’s time to turn the page on this unending Nightmare, rather than promoting Hillary to fulfill Obama’s (or more accurately, George Soros’s) Third Term.
