Have you asked yourself why the Border Patrol has endorsed Trump?
Could THIS have something to do with it?
We’ve already seen that Hillary is a fan of ‘Open Borders’.
Have you wondered just how far her side is willing to take it?
Would you believe … THIS far?
— John Binder ? (@JxhnBinder) October 7, 2016
Fast-tracking people on the waiting list, to hurry up and have their status corrected. Why?
So they can vote in the next election.
Remember when Trump met with ICE officials in August? Would you like to know what HIS priorities were?
In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, Crane discussed the details of his intimate meeting with the GOP nominee—revealing that the biggest takeaway from their exchange was Trump’s unwavering support for law enforcement. “It was extremely clear that this guy is on law enforcement’s side,” said Crane, who represents approximately 7,000 ICE officers and staff responsible for enforcing America’s immigration laws.
“[Trump] made no bones about it—he wants the rule of law followed in our country, and he wants to make America safe,” Crane added. “He made clear he’s on the side of law and order, and is on the side of the American public.”
“This is not the person that you frequently see on TV,” Crane said. “[Trump] was very welcoming, very sincere. He really wanted to hear from boots on the ground, officers out in the field about what’s happening.”
…Trump has pledged that “after my inauguration, for the first time in decades, Americans will wake up in a country where their immigration laws are enforced,” Hillary Clinton is running on an immigration campaign platform that is more extreme than even President Obama’s. As Breitbart News has previously reported, Clinton’s stated immigration proposals and campaign promises, if implemented, would essentially bring about the dissolution of our nation’s borders.
Unlike Trump, Hillary Clinton and her campaign had not reached out to the nation’s ICE officers, Crane said.
Which of these is interested in America? And which is interested in entrenching their own (hidden) agenda?