When you pit one special interest group against another, somebody has to lose.
The XY chromosome competitor in the cycling race won.
It’s a recurring theme in women’s athletics competitions — one that undermines the whole point
of having a separate athletic system for female athletes.
We’ve covered this complex problem before.
Rhys "Rachel" McKinnon celebrates his victory over women ???? Congratulation! ????
We men are clearly superior to women, we even beat them at women's cycling ???? pic.twitter.com/IIfHCSUaNH
— Gender????Professecs (@gprofessx) October 14, 2018
Now the other athletes on the podium are making their objections known.
‘No one is a transgender to steal anyone’s medal,’ van Herrikhuyzen wrote. ‘We had an honest race under UCI rules. If you compete you accept the rules, otherwise, don’t compete. I can only imagine what she had to go through in her life to be where she is now, how hard it is to fit in.’
Wagner had initially snapped back, writing: ‘Just because it’s a CURRENT UCI rule doesn’t mean it[‘s] fair or right. And rules can be changed.’
Wagner was the third-place finisher in the race.
She’s got a point. We have a seperate female competition structure because there are some very substantial differences between male and physiology. You need look no further than the differences between records in male and female versions of events.
Ask yourself: how many top competitors in men’s events have personal bests above the world record mark for the female equivalent of their event?
If gender is merely a social construct where science and biology have no meaningful role, what accounts for this difference?
And why do so many XY chromosome “women” competing in female events finish at the top of the podium — again and again and again?
At what point would society decide it’s not just coincidence that the women-who-stand-up-to-pee tend to outperform their XX counterparts in ‘fair’ competition.
Predictably, she got slapped down for being honest about the race. She’s been labeled a ‘bigot’ now. She’s backtracked on her specific comments but is still pushing for a rules change.
How did the activist take her apology? It was with the usual grace and class you would expect a ‘progressive’ activist to do pretty much anything.
The ‘winner’ of the race had this to say:
Sore losers in sport are bad enough. But a sore winner?
As a general rule, that’s absolutely contemptible, for men and women alike.
Remember how freaked out the Libs got after seeing Trump in his trademark red-and-white hat? Just wait until they see him in THIS one!
In a playful tribute to the sackful of goodies Trump’s leadership has been to our nation in taking the brakes off our economy, slashing regulation, cutting taxes, and putting a stop to judicial activism — here is another one of Doug Giles’s “MAGA Masterpieces” …
… we give you ‘Santa Trump‘. Sorry to say, the original is sold. But prints are available for those who want one either for themselves or as a gift.
By the way, since Facebook has unpublished ClashDaily’s page, your best bet to keep in the loop is to Subscribe to our ClashDaily Newsletter right here:
We’re also moving onto a new platform, MeWe. It’s like Facebook without the data breaches and censorship.
Sign up and you can still get all the ClashDaily goodness by joining our MeWe group.
Do you love what we’re doing at Clash?
Do you want to kick in to our ‘war chest’ so that we Happy Warriors can maximize the size of the footprint we leave on Leftism’s backside? Here’s a link for ya to do just that.