Orwellian: Father Could Now Be JAILED If He Calls His Daughter A Girl

Written by Wes Walker on May 3, 2019

The bad news just got worse for one distressed dad.

One father has been told that his precious daughter is no longer to be called his little girl… by court order.

We have covered this story before. And we thought it was shocking and disgusting back then. But back then, it was ‘just’ a matter of dad being silenced and threatened by the courts. It’s worse than we thought.

Not only is he forbidden to discuss his daughter, her condition, treatments, gender etc, etc, by the courts, but neither is he permitted to discuss the ruling against him with anyone other than his lawyer. Name of the father (pseudonym given as ‘Clark’) and the daughter (‘Maxine’):

“This Court has already determined that it is a form of family violence to [Maxine] for any of his family members to address him by his birth name, refer to him as a girl or with female pronouns (whether to him directly or to third parties), or to attempt to persuade him to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria. [Maxine] says that the evidence establishes that [Clark] has done all of the above, and has continued to do so even after the Court found that these actions were contrary to [Maxine]’s best interests and constitute family violence,” Marzari wrote.

The Supreme Court justice also faulted the father for speaking to the media and publishing posts about Maxine’s status as a female on social media. Her ruling cited two articles in The Federalist quoting Clark, which reveal the father’s determination that his daughter “is a girl. Her DNA will not change through all these experiments they do.” The order went on to cite angry comments on the Federalist articles.

“I find that [Clark]’s sharing of [Maxine]’s private information has exposed his child to degrading and violent public commentary. [Clark] has nevertheless continued to support the media organizations posting this commentary with additional interviews, and has expressed a desire for further opportunities to do so,” Marzari wrote. “I find that [Clark] is using [Maxine] to promote his own interests above those of his child, by making [Maxine] the unwilling poster child (albeit anonymously) of [Clark]’s cause.”

“In conclusion, I find that [Maxine] is an at-risk family member who is highly vulnerable. I find that his father’s expressions of rejection of [Maxine]’s gender identity, both publicly and privately, constitutes family violence against [Maxine]. Finally, I find that [Clark]’s conduct in this regard is persistent and unlikely to cease in the absence of a clear order to restrain it,” Marzari ruled. — Source: PJMedia

But the courts were so hostile in their ruling against him that they went so far as to add insult to injury:

“Any Peace Officer, including any R.C.M.P. Officer, having jurisdiction in the Province of British Columbia, who has reasonable and probable grounds believes that the Respondent … is in breach of the terms of this order may immediately arrest that person and bring him before a Judge of the Supreme Court promptly after the arrest, to be dealt with on an inquiry to determine whether he has committed a breach of this order or is in contempt of court,” the second order states.

In other words, not only can this father not refer to his daughter as a girl or by her original name in public or in private, but if a police officer thinks he has done so, he may be immediately arrested. The father cannot even show other people the court documents issuing these orders.

If a cop THINKS he has referred to his daughter as a girl, or by her birth name, whether in public or in private, he can be immediately frogmarched to jail.

In the name of ‘tolerance’ of course.

His daughter is fourteen years old.

Too young to smoke, or drink. Too young to consent to a tattoo or a cell phone contract… but she is old enough to launch a life-altering medical decision that will disrupt puberty and most likely leave her sterile.

All for an invasive ‘treatment’ that a statistically-significant number of recipients come to regret.

But dad isn’t allowed to say anything about it, or to advocate on behalf of her long term interests. Because progressivism has spoken… in the name of ‘tolerance’.

ClashDaily.com’s, Editor-In-Chief, Doug Giles how-to book:

Raising Righteous & Rowdy Girls

In ‘Raising Righteous and Rowdy Girls’, Doug Giles reinforces the notion that little women don’t need to be pampered by their fathers to turn out right. And having met his beautiful daughters, I know his philosophy works. As a strong-willed woman who thinks her daddy is the greatest guy in the world, I can tell you this is a must-read for every man who hopes to earn the same title. —-S.E. Cupp Best Selling Author & Fox News Analyst