BOOM: Judge Gives Wax My B*lls Activist Some BAD News

Written by Wes Walker on October 23, 2019

Remember the story about the activist who sued because ladies in salons refused to give a Brazillian to his scrotum? Yaniv will NOT be quite so lippy now.

We reported on the story some time ago, back when #WaxMyBalls was trending on Twitter. (Speaking of Twitter, this same activist was apparently friends with some Twitter higher-ups, which helped insulate Yaniv from being sanctioned for what would otherwise have been called online harassment of others.)

If you missed the story, we covered it here: Male To Female Transgender Activist Demands Ladies Wax Male Genitals — Cries ‘Discrimination’ When They Refuse

The following is taken from a press release from the Justice Centre of Constitutional Freedoms announcing the victory:

Trending: Pope Francis Invokes Hitler, Criticizes Politicians Who Denounce Homosexuality

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) is pleased to announce that the BC Human Rights Tribunal has ruled in favour of home estheticians’ right to refuse to handle male genitalia against their will.

The decision noted, “human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.” The decision further found that the complainant Jessica Yaniv “engaged in improper conduct”, “filed complaints for improper purposes”, and concluded Yaniv’s testimony was “disingenuous and self-serving.” Finally, noted the Tribunal, Yaniv was “evasive and argumentative and contradicted herself” while giving evidence.

Yaniv filed complaints against them alleging discrimination based on gender identity and gender expression. In total, Yaniv filed 15 complaints against various estheticians in the Vancouver area seeking as much as $15,000 in damages against each esthetician.

Yaniv has made numerous public comments against immigrants. At the hearings, Yaniv contended that immigrants use their religion to discriminate against trans people because they refused to wax the male genitals of those who identify as women.

The Justice Centre represented Blue Heaven Beauty Lounge and its owner, Sandeep Banipal, who is an adherent to the Sikh religion. Ms. Banipal is not trained to wax male genitals, and as she explained in the response to the complaint against her, it “is not something I am comfortable with or trained to do”.

The Justice Centre also represented Sukhi Hehar Gill, who was forced to close her business due to the complaint against her. Ms. Gill, also a practicing adherent of the Sikh faith, provided waxing services only to female clients, attending alone at her clients’ homes. She explained in her response to Yaniv’s complaint against her that it “is contrary to my faith” to provide waxing services to a biological male. Yaniv had requested that Gill attend at Yaniv’s personal residence to provide arm and leg waxing services.

Finally, the Justice Centre represented Marcia Carnauba, a third esthetician who was suspicious about Yaniv’s behaviour in advance of the appointment and cancelled it as a precaution. Ms. Carnauba also does not have the necessary training, tools or comfort level to perform waxing services on male genitalia. Ms. Carnauba closed her aesthetic business following the complaint against her.

Here is the rationale for why they won the case, (still citing the press release):

An expert in genital waxing testified at the hearing, informing the Tribunal that estheticians who are not trained in male genital waxing should not attempt to wax a penis and scrotum due to the risk of serious injury to the customer. The expert also testified that the necessary prolonged manipulation of a client’s penis and scrotum often results in sexual arousal and a request for sexual services. The expert said her salon’s refusal to provide sexual services has resulted in name-calling, intimidation and customer requests to masturbate in her salon.

Most of the women who were the target of Yaniv’s complaints work out of their own home, are of immigrant background, and have small children with them in the house during the day.

Serious injury, eh? So, if Yaniv had successfully bullied someone into waxing it, would that have resulted in a lawsuit too? Of course it would have!

Yaniv is a thoroughly repulsive example of someone who never quite learned how to work and play well with others. Now that Yaniv has been exposed as a malicious, racist huckster willing to abuse the legal system for personal gain, maybe this will help teach some manners and respect.

But in this case, that’s a REALLY big ask.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.