Did Rep. Adam Schiff Mischaracterize Evidence In Impeachment Hearing? New Documents Suggest He Did…
Was Schifty being sinister or just sloppy in getting this so very, very wrong?
The Schiff-weasel was living down to his reputation in his handling (‘massaging’) of MORE evidence allegedly ‘against’ Trump. It was the redacted the parts that made his allegations so obiously false.
Some of the information used in the House Impeachment fracas may have been ‘mischaracterized’ by Schiff.
The problem stems from a letter that Schiff sent to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) last week that summarizes “a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani,” Politico reported. “In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas ‘continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,’ citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: ‘trying to get us mr Z.’ The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.”
Politico added, “But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: ‘mr Z answers my brother.’ That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.”
Democrat officials did not dispute the suggestion that Schiff’s claim was false.
Source: DailyWire
Is there ANY portion of the case they are trying to throw at the President that ISN’T tainted by that google-eyed weasel’s lies?
Anything at all?
Here’s what the Republicans said in response:
“The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public,” one senior GOP aide told Politico. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”
Source: DailyWire
As the saying goes, to a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Schiff doesn’t have a hammer, but he is a writer of fiction. So, yeah, there’s that.
This is why evidence needs to be open to scrutiny and cross-examination. But of course, they were ‘in a hurry’.
And was anything changed when he went over to the Senate? Of course not.
Watch Schiff make up more fake dialogue
It was bad enough he made up the President's phone call in the House, now he's fabricating what the president of Ukraine said (no pressure) in the Senate
Democrats have no case, so they just make schiff up pic.twitter.com/R2nNJrCiZt
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) January 22, 2020
The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male