Why should any woman care what a gay man has to say about women’s reproductive rights?
Buttigieg, who is wrapping himself up in his Christianity, lauds killing babies in the womb as he tries to clinch the baby butcher vote.
What happened to “no vagina, no opinion” with regard to abortion? Personally, I think that’s ridiculous because we should all be concerned about how we treat the most vulnerable in society, but the standard that abortion is a “women’s issue” seems to be easily discarded by those on the left when men support abortion.
It’s even more egregious in Pete’s case — he has no chance of ever being involved in this decision. Unless you count the incessant lecturing that it’s wrong to impose your view that taking the life of the unborn for convenience is morally reprehensible. And yet, Preachy Pete wants to impose his rather extreme views on abortion on the rest of us.
But Pete is a married gay man, so he’s not likely going to get some woman pregnant and have her face this difficult decision. This means that he literally has even less at stake than a man who created a life that a woman chooses to snuff out. You’d think that the women that shriek “my body, my choice” while holding a sign saying “get your rosaries off my ovaries” would also say that a religious gay man should have zero say in abortion. And yet… here he is applauding abortionists for their good work without anyone on the left batting an eye.
Buttigieg even thanked a “courageous” woman who was grateful that she killed her child in the womb so that she could pursue her own goals by saying that “we are all lifted up” when we hear stories like this.
Preachy Pete then says that it’s important for “a candidate like him to stand strong for women’s reproductive freedom.” Notice that he couches it all in as an issue of freedom and takes a shot at Republicans for their “narrow” view of freedom. Why does “a candidate like him” need to stand firm on killing babies? Is it because he’s gay or because he’s put the banner of “Christian” all over his campaign?
And now here’s Very Good Christian and Biblical Scholar Pete Buttigieg praising baby butchers and thanking them for the excellent job they do in killing human beings
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) February 25, 2020
Preachy Pete refuses to acknowledge that the lives of innocent children are snuffed out through abortion. During the debate last night, Senator Elizabeth Warren accidentally said this out loud.
Many pro-lifers can clearly comprehend the argument that a woman has the right to bodily autonomy but that doesn’t extend to killing a life inside her, but pro-choice advocates focus only on the woman and completely refuse to acknowledge that there is a unique life that is terminated when a woman has an abortion.
This is precisely what is wrong with the abortion debate on the left; it completely erases one person from the debate — the child who has no voice. It is also antithetical to the faith that Preachy Pete wears on his sleeve. This view of people is ultimately utilitarian and not as individuals made in the image of God.
In this clip, Buttigieg is stating that it is a better choice to abort a child and pursue an education rather than bring that child into the world. This is a complete disregard for the unique individual in the womb.
It’s truly ghoulish, and it doesn’t sound very Christian to me.