Become a Clash Insider!
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Follow Doug on Parler @TheGilesWay.
For the longest time, President Trump was trolling CNN about being Fake News. Now one of their own employees is using far stronger language to describe it.
How ironic that CNN’s guy actually said ‘no one ever says these things out loud’ while being filmed by someone from Project Veritas’ army of clandestine reporters.
This time, the mark was Charlie Chester, a technical director for CNN.
To the surprise of none of us, since being busted by O’Keefe, his social media has gone dark.
Maybe this has something to do with it.
Prior to his @LinkedIn being DELETED, @CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester's job description read "played an integral part in the 2020 Presidential elections." pic.twitter.com/kTwabu50xy
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) April 13, 2021
Let’s set this up properly.
O’Keefe never releases JUST one video when he’s blowing the whistle on someone. This time was no different.
First, James gave us some videos of Charlie incriminating both himself and the company he worked for which, as mentioned, happened to be CNN.
Here’s Charlie bragging that CNN did exactly what sites like ours have said all along, that the media let Joe stay home while they did the heavy lifting that dragged his withered carcass across the finish line in November.
The first part of this video has the juicy clips, and the later part of it puts them in their proper context.
They were deliberate in their messaging. Showing him in his aviator shades, or jogging, or plausibly youthful and vital, he explicitly said they were trying to ‘paint [Biden] as a young geriatric’. He bragged that if it were not for CNN, he does not think Trump would have been voted out. He admits that CNN’s entire focus was to get Trump voted out. ‘Our goal was to get Trump out of office without saying that’s what it was’.
He even tells us what’s going to happen after the COVID story stops getting traction — they’re going back to climate change. It’s all about the fear. Fear sells.
He even gives a for instance. That whole angle about medical experts talking about Trump’s hand shaking being sings of some neurological damage was nothing more than a hit piece and speculation designed to push a narrative.
‘We had nothing else to run with at the time,’ he says, ‘were like, just taking shots off the bow, hoping something would hit, you know?’
After that, we’ve got another video in which Charlie is talking about what he thinks propaganda is and whether he thinks CNN is. (He does.)
In that one, as another for-instance, Charlie admits that their reporting about Matt Gaetz lately is designed to cripple a political opponent they consider a threat to the Democrat agenda. Sounds like Matt might be interested in hitting CNN with a lawsuit that will make whatever Nick Sandmann settled for look like pocket change.
BREAKING: CNN Director REVEALS @CNN Coverage of @RepMattGaetz Is ‘Propaganda’
“If the agenda say, is to get @mattgaetz right now, he’s like this Republican. He’s a problem for the Democratic Party…So we’re(@CNN) going to keep running these stories to keep hurting him.” pic.twitter.com/6Gjr8R7Eh5
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) April 13, 2021
Come to think of it, he might not be the only one with a good shot at a case.
Then we’ve got footage of the confrontation where James O’Keefe tells him that they’ve recorded what we just showed you he had said on camera. He wasn’t very happy about it.
As a nice finishing touch, and to jam a stick in CNN’s eye, James went on Hannity to talk about this latest video.
Delicious.
The left, predictably is in damage control mode.
But if a lawsuit ever DOES come out of this, discovery will be absolutely AMAZING.
And if the parent companies are included in the suit for failing to deal with a known issue of Zucker using this for his political campaigns, maybe it will give all of these ‘woke’ corporations second thoughts of putting partisan politics ahead of their fiduciary responsibilities to their shareholders.
