Surgeon FIRED By College Of Medicine For Speaking Out About COVID Vaccines For Children
Become a Clash Insider!
Big Tech is clamping down on conservative media big time. Don’t let Big Tech pre-chew your news. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
Dr. Francis Christian says that parents haven’t had proper informed consent regarding the COVID vaccine for children and therefore the Nuremberg Code has been violated. WOW!
Dr. Francis Christian is a Clinical Professor of General Surgery at the University of Saskatchewan and a practicing surgeon in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Dr. Francis Christian, who is a practicing surgeon in Saskatoon, says that he is a pro-vaccine physician.
“I am only too aware of the great scourges of mankind, including smallpox, that have been eliminated or made innocuous by vaccination,” he said.
“I am also pro-vaccine for my own family, including myself.”
However, he called for a pause on administering the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to children as young as 12…
…Last Thursday, Christian said that in medicine, there is a “sacrosanct principle” of informed consent before administering “any kind of drug or treatment or intervention.”
“Before the vaccine is rolled out to children, both children and parents must know the risks of mRNA vaccines to children, any benefit to children and any alternatives to vaccines,” he said in a statement.
“The principle of informed consent is being consistently violated in this province for the mRNA vaccine for our kids. I have not met a single vaccinated child or parent who has been adequately informed and who then understand the risks of this vaccine or its benefits.”
Source: Global News
Dr. Christian has been suspended from his duties at the University because of recent public statements about his concern over the administration of the coronavirus vaccine in children.
He has said that there are 8 points that parents and children should be aware of before agreeing to an experimental mRNA vaccine for a minor child. It’s a matter of informed consent.
- The mRNA vaccine is a new, experimental vaccine design and has never been used in humans before.
- The mRNA vaccines have not been fully authorized by Health Canada, the CDC, or in most nations around the world.
- In order to qualify for Emergency-Use-Authorization (EUA), there must be an emergency. For several groups such as the elderly, the vulnerable, and healthcare workers, this is the case, but not for children. The median age that has died in Canada is 83.8 years. The risk of children dying from COVID is 0.003%, less than dying of the seasonal flu.
- Children do not readily transmit the virus to adults, and adults should be vaccinated. In some countries, teachers have had lower rates of COVID infection than the general population.
- The mRNA vaccines have already been associated with several thousand deaths according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These appear to be unusual compared to the number of vaccines administered, but they are a “strong signal” and cannot be ignored. In just a few months, 5,888 deaths were recorded after vaccination. This would normally trigger a pause, but that hasn’t been the case.
- The mRNA vaccine is causing myocarditis and pericarditis in young people. This caused the German and UK vaccine recommendation agencies to not authorizing the vaccine for children. (EDITOR’S NOTE: On June 23, the CDC reported that the risk for myocarditis is ten times the expected rate in 12-17 year olds.)
- The benefit of the vaccine for children is marginal, at best, in the small trials that were done. The Absolute Rate of Reduction (ARR) has been shown to be lesss than 2 percent. The the small studies being conducted cannot determine real risk or medium- to long-term effects.
- The drug Ivermectin is the alternative, but it is being blocked in many Western countries.
Watch Dr. Christain’s comments that got him suspended here:
One of the things that has shocked many Canadians recently is that children 12 and older do not need parental consent for vaccination.
Some jurisdictions, like the very large Peel Region in Toronto blatantly advertises this.
Please note info around the consent for vaccination has been updated. Youth aged 12+ can consent to immunization on their own behalf provided they understand the benefits and risks of vaccination. As with any other medical appointment, we encourage family discussion.
— Region of Peel (@regionofpeel) May 20, 2021
Some schools — which were closed for in-person learning — offered pop-up vaccine clinics while the government pushed the safety and necessity of youth 12-17 to get the vaccine.
The first point of the Nuremberg Code explains the necessity of consent.
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
Source: National Institute Of Health
On Monday, June 21, 2021, the World Health Organization’s recommendations for vaccinating children for COVID-19 was published and immediately caused a stir.
Here’s what it said, “Children should not be vaccinated for the moment. There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults. However, children should continue to have the recommended childhood vaccines.” (Emphasis in original.)
It has since been updated to “clarify” the meaning.
Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.
More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.
WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has concluded that the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above. Children aged between 12 and 15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups for vaccination. Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy.
It’s important for children to continue to have the recommended childhood vaccines.
Dr. Christian recorded a meeting notifying him that he has been “temporarily and immediately suspended” both his clinical and academic responsibilities at the pending an investigation into his “activities and social media” relating to the vaccines.
On the call with Dr. Christian were: Dr. Preston Smith, the Dean of Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Dr. Susan Shaw, the Chief Medical Officer of the Saskatchewan Health Authority, and Dr. Brian Ulmer, Head of the Department of Surgery at the Saskatchewan College of Medicine.
Dr. Christian is now being represented by the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms in his defense against the University suspension and another complaint filed by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan.
He is not the only doctor in Canada that is facing professional repercussions for not following lockstep with the “medical consensus.” Dr. Byram Bridle, who warned about the collection of the spike protein from the vaccine in the ovaries and bone marrow, and is facing critiism for participating in a panel discussion on Parliament Hill hosted by a controversial Member of Parliament, and Dr. Chris Milburn was removed from his position as the Head of Emergency for suggesting that it’s appropriate to allow doctors to comment publicly on their concerns over public health policies.