Biden’s Unconstitutional Title IX Rewrite Just Got Fish-Slapped In Court — Here’s The 411

This is what happens when a Republican who understands the system of checks and balances actually uses them to preserve the Constitution.

On the very same day that New York and Letitia James were forced to respond to AG Bailey’s Election Interference court case against New York for the obscene cases against Trump in New York, (New York is doubling down, and the case is headed to trial), Bailey is fighting the Democrat agenda of destruction on another front: Title IX.

He was one of several State Attorneys General who filed suit to block Joe Biden’s unconstitutional rewrite of Title IX to completely change the terms of law to elevate the desire of men identifying as women to be welcomed as true women above the right of all women to have safe places to be in various states of undress as they shower, change, and use the washroom.

That is to say nothing of the parallel fairness implicit in letting women compete against women in athletic events — with everything it entails about unfair competitive advantages or dangerous, needless risks of injury by women and girls.

The party that can no longer define the word woman charged ahead with new policies guided by shifting definitions… neglecting the fact that only Congress has the Constitutional right to amend laws.

Today, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey announced that the Eastern District of Missouri granted his motion to block Joe Biden’s unconstitutional rewrite of Title IX that would allow biological males in female spaces.

“This is a huge win for women and girls across the country. The Court recognized that Joe Biden’s plan to allow biological males into female spaces was not only blatantly illegal, but also a slap in the face to every woman in America,” said Attorney General Bailey. “As the father of a young daughter, I take this fight personally. My office will continue to fight for the preservation of women and girls, who have a right to thrive without fear of being erased by a radical transgender ideology.”

In complete disregard for the rights of women, the Department of Education’s new regulatory requirements would have forced educational programs that receive federal money to accept a radical transgender ideology. Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any educational program that receives federal money, including K-12 schools, colleges, and universities. The new rule ignored these protections for women by forcing educational programs to accommodate biological males’ desire to enter female-only spaces and join female-only organizations. If schools ignore these requirements in an attempt to protect women’s rights, the federal government promised to revoke their funding.
[…] Today, the Court sided with Missouri and ruled that the Department of Education’s new regulatory requirements were unconstitutional and an unlawful interpretation of Title IX.