Dems Back Hamas Terror Simp — PressSec Nukes Them From Orbit

Marco Rubio kicked a hornets’ nest when he made the decision to pull the credentials of the guy organizing violent protests at schools that celebrate the heinous acts of recognized terror groups.

He’s been picked up by authorities and he is being sent back to a country he likes better than this one.

Naturally, the Democrats are incensed.

Senators posted this online:

Followed immediately by this, without even a hint of self-awareness:

Mahmoud Khalil is not mere protester. He’s an organizer. The protests he has been organizing have been the kind that result in property damage and violent clashes. He has shown open support for Hamas, and and their tactics. His group is posting calls to action like this one:

Mahmoud Khalil supports terrorism, supports October 7. His group openly supports the murder of civilians and the, um, overthrow of Western civilization. Or something.

You can insist on this neo-Nazis-marching-in-Skokie debate, sure. It's America. The commitment to free speech… https://t.co/cNBdKOhHma pic.twitter.com/PmIOS7fqgC

— Haviv Rettig Gur (@havivrettiggur) March 11, 2025

Others have specifically invoked language connected to the October 7th Massacre with an urge to ‘look to the tactics of the Palestinians’. When an American citizen breaks America’s laws, they face charges.

When someone from abroad does, they can be removed from the country. Dems have tipped their hand by showing which side of this issue they have sided with in Khalil’s case. That’s exactly the question Trump’s Press Sec addressed in a question about Khalil and charges.

The question that sets up Karoline Leavitt’s reply comes in at the 31:45 timestamp on the original X post that this video comes from.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Mar. 11, 2025 https://t.co/EilIjL9rmc

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 11, 2025

She knows this question will be coming, and she’s ready for it. She cites the specific authority that grants Rubio to revoke the status of this guy and anyone else who sees fit to pick up where he left off.

The short version of her answer is this: Rubio does not require that a criminal charge be leveled against someone for the Secretary of State to revoke his right to be in the country. Other criteria can trigger such a lawful response, and those criteria were met.