UN Going Broke Without Your Tax Dollars… And They’re STILL Pushing For One-World Government

What does it really matter whether Russia or Ukraine controls Crimea, or who runs the West Bank if ANOTHER group serves as overlords for the whole damn planet?

If you thought the American and EU bureaucracies were unresponsive to the concerns of ordinary workaday folks, just imagine the ivory towers the DAVOS types would rule from.

Just this week, we’ve got yet another example of a technocrat who clearly thinks he’s one of the ‘enlightened few’ who ought to be ruling all the rest of us ‘poor schlubs’… for some reason.

Jeffrey Sachs, speaking to an audience in Cyprus, said the quiet part out loud.

Jeffrey Sachs: “We need a global government. That’s the UN.”

This is why we need to leave the UN. They’re a bunch of unelected power-hungry psychopaths. pic.twitter.com/6l0pnZ90oJ

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) May 4, 2025

Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University professor and global economist, is quoted in the X post advocating for a global government through the UN, reflecting his long-standing views on global governance as seen in his 2023 UN Security Council testimony where he emphasized the UN Charter’s role in fostering peace and sustainable development.

We need look no further than the WHO’s corruption during COVID to see just how badly that can go. Or have we already forgotten that there was a damned good reason Trump approve of Nikki Haley pulling America out of the Human Rights Council.

They’re corrupt as hell. Remember UNRWA, and their complicit role in the Hamas terrorists’ attack and hostage taking in 10/7? THAT’s who this clown-professor wants to see in charge.

Maybe the professor should turn his energies elsewhere. Like saving his beloved UN from insolvency.

On May 5th the un will brief members on a previously unreported $600m (17%) cut to its $3.7bn budget aimed at avoiding default this year. It will include a hiring freeze while officials consider further savings that a Western diplomat describes as “moving jobs from New York to Nairobi”. Yet it may not be enough. A combination of deadbeat members and mad budget rules have led to a liquidity crisis. Now, a leaked White House memo proposing that America stop paying its mandatory contributions threatens a financial crash in the citadel of peace and security.
Last year the un had a $200m cash shortfall, despite spending only 90% of its planned budget. This year will be much worse. Internal modelling suggests that the year-end cash deficit will, without cuts, probably blow out to $1.1bn, leaving the un without money to pay salaries and suppliers by September. Most un funding, such as for bodies providing humanitarian food or shelter, is voluntary, but the core functions are paid for through mandatory dues, linked to the size of members’ economies. These core functions include General Assembly meetings, peacekeeping and human-rights monitoring. In a letter seen by The Economist that Mr Guterres sent to members in February, he warned that the peacekeeping budget to pay for troops may run dry by mid-year.
The “root problem”, according to the un boss, is that some members are paying their bills late and others not at all. The un collects mandatory dues in the year that it intends to spend them. For that reason, members are meant to send their fees in January so that the un can pay its staff and suppliers. But countries are paying their required fees later and later. In 2024 about 15% of the un’s budget funds arrived in December. Then there are the free-riders. Members failed to pay $760m in mandatory contributions. The unpaid millions were owed by 41 countries, including America, Argentina, Mexico and Venezuela. Some may have paid after the year ended.

The UN has a high opinion of who it is and what it does. If the rest of the world was convinced they were the image they present of themselves, and not just another unaccountable and bloated bureaucracy throwing money at their friends and relations, getting fancy titles they wouldn’t have at home and living a lifestyle in cosmopolitian cities that would in many cases, be shameful or illegal if they tried it at home.

We do NOT, in fact, need a ‘global government’.

The last time a foreign power exercised control over American interests, our forefathers paid with blood, treasure, and their sacred honor to chuck it overboard like they did the tea in the harbor.

It’s been almost exactly 250 years since that shot was fired in Concord, and some of us have failed to learn the lessons that came with it.

Isn’t it about time we turn the UN building into something productive so it stops being a stage for the worst kind of corruptocrats and despots?