Whistleblower Brings Receipts — Puts Barr At Heart Of Biden’s Arrest Trump Conspiracy
Could what's being claimed about his role in J6 be what 'shook Bongino to his core'?
Like any other claim, it must be tested before it can be claimed as ‘true’. But the implications, if they do hold up, could be even bigger than Russiagate.
ClashDaily has had a hot-and-cold view of Bill Barr. There are a great many things, especially toward the end of his tenure, that raised doubts about him, but for the most part, those had been attributed to being a creature of the establishment class rather than the corruption endemic to the swamp itself.
It’s a related complaint, but one stems from misplaced principles, the other stems from having none at all.
Our opinion of him slipped when we saw the general antagonism toward both Trump and the J6 participants after his time in office. It became more skeptical still when one of Pennsylvania’s AGs claimed that Bill Barr forbade him from investigating — either prior to the 2020 election or shortly after — claims of election irregularities.
But claims that he’s dirty and actively strategizing with the people who orchestrated the criminal investigations against Trump… and that a whistleblower has the emails and burner phones to prove it? Let’s just say it wasn’t on our bingo card for 2025.
But Project Veritas got its hands on a big story. If it’s true, he’s going to wish he hadn’t said anything about RICO, especially if that word starts getting thrown around for his own role in the Trump prosecutions.
The post:
đ¨BREAKING PART TWO: Bill Barr Held Secret Meetings to Plot Prosecutions of Trump and Block His Political Comeback
âBill Barr was like, âWe should bring RICO because it's a very difficult type of charge to defend.ââ – PatrĂcia LĂŠlis, Whistleblower
âYou took my documents and⌠pic.twitter.com/cOAw1LXnHy
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 7, 2025
The Video:
đ¨BREAKING PART TWO: Bill Barr Held Secret Meetings to Plot Prosecutions of Trump and Block His Political Comeback
âBill Barr was like, âWe should bring RICO because it's a very difficult type of charge to defend.ââ – PatrĂcia LĂŠlis, Whistleblower
âYou took my documents and⌠pic.twitter.com/cOAw1LXnHy
— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) August 7, 2025
How ironic would it be if this burner phone becomes the critical evidence unlocking the conspiracy to indict Trump in attempts to keep him from taking office? And what about claims that Pam Bondi was trying to suppress this story? Is that accurate, or was she trying to conduct an investigation discreetly so that anyone being investigated never had the opportunity to destroy incriminating evidence like burner phones?
Which prompts the bigger question — just how deep does the rabbit hole go?