Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Opinion

Trump’s FBI Just Released What Biden’s FBI Tried To Bury About Covenant School Shooting

Notice how this tracks with Biden's FBI burying 'unhelpful' data sets?

When the political right can be tied to heinous acts, details are leaked before the bodies are cold. But when leftist narratives are threatened? It’s (D)ifferent.

The Covington school in Nashville, for instance. When Audrey (aka ‘Aiden’) Hale laid out an enaborate plan to target a school for a murder spree, the usual objections to ‘deadnaming’ a girl who identifies as a boy were strangely silent.

As if the fact that she was transgender was not allowed to be a consideration in understanding her possible motives.

And the Manifesto? Unlike so many that are leaked to friendly media sources, this particular manifesto was locked down tighter than Fort Knox. Media outlets tried to sue for access, and were denied. When local cops leaked a few pages showing that this killer was motivated by hatred and ideology, the cops with access to that file faced more intense scrutiny than the J6 Pipe Bomber.

We knew from that leak that Audrey had a particular contempt for both faith and caucasians… an animus that was conveniently left out of what the public was told about the events.

But, just like the FBI crime numbers that leave out major cities to ‘fudge’ their numbers, or enter the bogus racial descriptions on arrest records to skew data and render it meaningless, the Biden FBI was playing the same obscene game that so many other journalists play.

Biden’s feds buried the inconvenient data, in her own words, that she ‘loves’ black people and ‘hates’ white people. (The presence/absence of black people came up in the pros/cons list of which school she should target. She didn’t want to traumatize black people or inspire copycats attacking black schools. White schools and Christians, on the other hand…? No such hesitations.)

For all her claims to ‘love’ black people, 61yo custodian Mike Hill, a black man who had worked there for 14 years, eventually lay dead among her other victims.

Before the kids she murdered had been laid to rest, activists were already staging shutdown protests where state buildings were swarmed by pro-trans activists worried about any imminent ‘backlash’ against the various pronoun-people.

Some of these activists wore (or sold) ominous-sounding merch with angry slogans and images of lethal weapons that would be held up as ‘proof positive’ of violent intent or even domestic terrorism if it were associated with any other group.

Of course, by then, Janes’ Revenge had already violently attacked and even firebombed pro-life clinics and some churches. Did this inspire copycats? Hard to say for sure. But as we think of incidents like the Annunciation shooting last summer, it’s not beyond impossible.

And the cherry on top?

All the firearms used in the shooting? They were bought and paid for by the American taxpayer.

In the entry, Hale wrote that “FAFSA [sic] grant checks started at $2,050.86,” followed by ledger-style notes documenting payments from Nossi College of Art and Design in Nashville, where Hale was enrolled at the time.

The financial entries appear alongside extensive notes about firearms Hale planned to purchase and use in the attack.

The Tennessee Star also reported those records may lend support to statements Hale’s parents made to Metro Nashville Police Department detectives shortly after the shooting.

Hale’s parents reportedly told investigators in 2023 that their child had used federal Pell Grant money to purchase the firearms used in the attack. — WHMI

All we really ask of the news media is that we all play by the same rules.

If evidence of ideology is to be treated as newsworthy…? Then print the ideology no matter who that news might inconvenience.

If the race, politics, and religious convictions of the accused is newsworthy? Then report faithfully on those details no matter who might be incriminated or what narratives might be breached.

Half-told truths can be even more dangerous lies than open falsehoods. And if you don’t believe me, go find some of those old videos not long after that violent summer of 2020 where people were asked about the stats of police violence and unarmed black males.

Here’s an example of one prof walking his students through their assumptions.

There is a visible amount of shock and surprise on this video and others like it when young people see the chasm between their assumptions about reality and the actual data are damning evidence of how the public has been lied to… and manipulated.

That kind of manipulation is never without motive. The real trick is to recognize who is lying, and whether their agenda is motivated by money, power, or some other agenda.

Wes Walker

Wes Walker is the author of "Blueprint For a Government that Doesn't Suck". He has been lighting up Clashdaily.com since its inception in July of 2012. Follow on twitter: @Republicanuck