Kash Patel Takes On Fake News For Defamation… Discovery Is Gonna Be EPIC

Kash said he would be hitting them with a defamation suit. And he meant it.

Muckraking and smear attacks are as old as politics themselves. But when the party out of power coordinates with media and third parties to destroy their enemies, that’s not ‘news’, that’s defamation.

We often refer back to David Brock’s ‘Media Matters War Plan 2017‘ which gave the textbook play-by-play steps that coordinated ‘impartial’ and ‘watchdog’ groups as political attack dogs to smear, slander, bring bogus legal charges, incriminate, and ultimately impeach a president who had not yet been sworn in as the 45th POTUS. Some of those same players were STILL at it during the Biden years when Trump was fighting to stay on the ballot.

That may have been the playbook they used against Trump. But it’s one they’ve been using for a LONG time. What they did to SCOTUS nominee Robert Bork was so obvious and vindictive that it turned the process into a verb.

They’ve thrown it at any number of political candidates and nominees ever since, and one of the reasons Trump has risen to the top was his unusual ability to trade punches with the people trying to use dirty defamation tactics to ruin him. It takes an unusual kind of chutzpah to turn your mugshot into a campaign photo.

They tried, and failed, to take down Hegseth with rumours and innuendo. And now they’re trying to do the same with Kash Patel, alleging him to be a drunk who is bailing on his responsibilities at work.

Let’s look at the success rate of the FBI in the past year, catching 8 of the top 10 most wanted, busting up HUGE child trafficking rings and releasing the kids in their clutches, opioid deaths are down by somewhere between 10 and 20%, murders are down by about 20% year over year. If these are the results he’s been able to generate as a ‘no-show’… what do they suggest things would look like if they weren’t accusing him of ‘slacking’?

Actually, that positive track record is part of the case Patel is presenting:

Would you believe one of his critics on the left actually thought they were dragging Kash for posting this list?

In his $250 Million suit against the Atlantic, Patel specified various claims as false and defamatory:

The Atlantic has made the decision to ‘stand by their reporting’. Interestingly, they have also stealth-edited their headline.

The usual suspects on the left are already running with the claims, planning to use them as an excuse to try to run him out of his job.

Sen. Schumer: "Over the weekend, more damning reports about FBI Director Kash Patel's disorderly, drunken, and deranged behavior came to light…Kash Patel is not simply unqualified. He's a grave risk to the rule of law, and to American national security." pic.twitter.com/APLN4UWc56

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) April 20, 2026

We note that Schumer never had a problem with Schiff’s leaks, Swalwell’s ‘compromised state’ with a Chinese honeypot, or even the Democrat who, evidence appears to show, fleeced FEMA for $5 Million bucks, but still works in Congress. It took a CONVICTION for Gold Bars Menendez to forfeit his vote in the Senate… and he stepped down voluntarily.

But NOW Schumer is morally outraged, because of an anonymous report that Kash is a lush. For all we know, Schumer himself — or his donor class — helped write this story for political gain. Just like the ‘Steel Dossier’, or the ‘Black Ledger’ used against Manifort in Ukraine… or, as we now know, the carefully orchestrated Dem Op set up by the First Impeachment Whistleblower, Schiff and others.

Klobuchar is likewise demanding an investigation. (While strangely disinterested in the tens of billions of fraud in her home state of Minnesota.)

Here’s just one example of someone putting their name on the record to refute the anonymous claims.

The most interesting outcome in this might not even be the defamation case itself, so much as any evidence that might come to light about collusion between the media and the Dems for whom they work as political stenographers.