Does Biden’s SCOTUS Pick Even GRASP The Three Branches Of Government?
Do we chalk this up to ineptitude, ideology, or both?

Remember how the establishment left clutched their pearls when everyone else objected to having a SCOTUS pick driven by race and gender before any other considerations? We’re seeing the fruit of that decision play out.
And it’s not looking good for KBJ.
Whereas the First and Third articles of the Constitution describe a body of individuals who perform their various prescribed roles as a group, the Second article recognizes the importance of having a single person responsible for the sorts of decisions that cannot be done as a committee, decisions that need a head of state to decide.
What we today call the ‘administrative state’ has no stand-alone independent existence in the Constitution. In the same way that lesser courts and magistrates derive their lawful authority from — and only from — the Article III provisions of the Constitution, and are therefore directly accountable to the Chief Justice (though check-and-balance provisions exist in the other branches), the Administrative State as it has come to be known derives its lawful authority from — and only from — an extension of the lawful authority the Constitution invests in the Executive Branch. That is why, if a president dislikes an appointee for any reason or no reason at all, he can dismiss that person. They do, after all, ‘serve at the pleasure of the President’. Note that does not say the President or Congress.
A case where Trump fired a government employee (in this case FTC) has worked its way up the courts, claiming he had no right to fire them. It’s by no means the first time SCOTUS has heard a case like this. And it’s likely to swing in Trump’s favor. (Again.)
If we took seriously the Constitutional idea of POTUS being the Unitary Executive, the firing might have gone ahead unnoticed and unremarked. Instead, we have Biden’s SCOTUS appointee going full Wilsonian Technocrat for … some reason … insisting that we need to be ruled by experts.
Because that selfsame approach worked out so VERY well in the pandemic years.
Anyhow, here she is waxing eloquent on why we should shelve the Constitution in favor of rule by unelected technocrats.
Justice Jackson says that it is the “best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues handled by experts” and it is undermined when one person has too much power. Agarwal agrees, saying too much power with one person is problematic. pic.twitter.com/recl3K6SiV
— CSPAN (@cspan) December 8, 2025
Why is a whack-a-doodle Biden appointee on a 6-3 court such a big deal?
Because if Dems ever get the chance, they have announced they plan to eliminate the filibuster and ‘reimagine’ the Supreme Court so it can go back to being a rubber-stamp for Democrat power-grabs… with 13 or even more members, all of which will (conveniently) be chosen by a party that has gone so radically left that they actively campaign against the enforcement of laws they themselves helped pass — including immigration and election laws.
Think for a second about all the times that the Biden administration either ignored the law, or weaponized it against their political rivals.
Now imagine that same group of people back in power with an opportunity to stack courts with the same sorts of people that have run as Soros-backed prosecutors. Now you have a class of people with zero interest in the Constitution giving a patina of jurisprudence to lawless behavior.
At that moment, we would cease to be a nation of laws, and would light the fuse for an era of civil strife that might have made even Lincoln’s blood run cold. And we all know what he was faced with presiding over.
Giles Volume II The Trump Collection (Doug Giles Art Collection)
This Donald Trump art book is the victory lap that conservatives have been waiting for since 2020. This hard-cover, full-color glossy collection by conservative painter, Doug Giles, will entertain you for hours on end and quickly become a valuable collector’s item as an icon of the MAGA movement.
“I’ve had a blast painting my Trump Collection over the last seven years. Several of these paintings made me laugh so hard that milk came out of my nostrils, and I haven’t had milk for thirty-six years. These epic paintings now reside in bars, hunting camps, man caves, she sheds, trophy rooms, and God and Country MAGA homes from sea to shining
sea.
One word of warning before you purchase this Trump Collection: This book will spawn liberal tears, Marxist rage, and NeoCon hissy fits, of course.
Finally, I hope you thoroughly enjoy this DJT gaggle of my gadfly oil paintings.” God bless, and stay rowdy. Doug Giles