SHUT YOUR PIE-HOLE PIERS: British Squawker Says, “1st Amendment shouldn’t protect vile bigots like Duck Dynasty star.”
Via Twitchy – When it comes to constitutional matters, Musket Morgan doesn’t have a clue.
This morning, he’s throwing in his unsolicited two cents about Phil Robertson’s suspension from “Duck Dynasty” over Robertson’s religious beliefs regarding homosexuality. And it’s clear that in light of recent events, Morgan is as big a jackass as ever:
Just as the 2nd Amendment shouldn't protect assault rifle devotees, so the 1st Amendment shouldn't protect vile bigots. #PhilRobertson
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) December 19, 2013
Phil Robertson is not a 'victim of political correctness'. He's a victim of his own repulsively racist, homophobic bigotry. #DuckDynasty
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) December 19, 2013
@piersmorgan You've never actually READ the Constitution, have you?
— Chris Barnhart (@ChrisBarnhart) December 19, 2013
Your hatred of the Bill of Rights is (constitutionally protected) bigotry. @piersmorgan
— Mikéy Ramoné (@ThePantau) December 19, 2013
"The 1st amendment should not protect people who offend me" – Constituional scholar and photoshop expert @piersmorgan
— S.M (@redsteeze) December 19, 2013
Yeah, because I care what @piersmorgan, a guy who altered photos of soldiers to make money, thinks is vile.
— Matt (@Matthops82) December 19, 2013
@piersmorgan I'm glad to see that you misunderstand other amendments as badly as you misinterpret the 2nd amendment.
— Garrett Hall (@Garrett_R_Hall) December 19, 2013
Read more: twitchy.com
