Now even TOP players among the Democrats are being implicated!
(There’s even a little gem in here for anyone doubting O’Keefe’s credibility.)
Disgraced Democratic operative Robert Creamer participated in daily calls with the Hillary Clinton campaign, and worked directly with President Barack Obama to organize “issue campaigns.”
Creamer makes the admissions in the latest undercover video release from James O’Keefe and Project Veritas, which captured Creamer describing his activities.
…O’Keefe also reports that Creamer accepted a foreign donation for a Democratic super PAC.
In the new video, Creamer goes even further, saying: “Every morning I am on a call at 10:30 that goes over the message being driven by the campaign headquarters … I am in this campaign mainly to deal with what earned media with television, radio, with earned media and social media, not with paid media, not with advertising.” He also mentions a conference call discussing a woman potentially coming forward to accuse Trump of inappropriate behavior.
Creamer, a seasoned Chicago activist, also talks about his work with Barack Obama, whom he says he has known since the 1980s, when Obama was a community organizer in Chicago: “He’s a pro, I’ve known the President since he was a community organizer in Chicago.”
Elsewhere, Creamer adds: “I do a lot of work with the White House on their issues, helping to run issue campaigns that they have been involved in. I mean, for immigration reform for the… the health care bill, for trying to make America more like Britain when it comes to gun violence issues.” — Breitbart
Hmmm…are there any LAWS concerning direct connection between SuperPacs and candidates? Would law enforcement want to look into that? Or do they ONLY press charges on brown-skinned Conservative critics of the establishment?
In this video, Veritas sets up a $20,000 political donation to a Democratic SuperPac… with promises that larger donations would follow. There was a fake millionaire. Fake donor company. And money from Belize. Not sketchy at all, right? But they didn’t mind. The ‘money came through’ without a problem. It gets into other stuff, like well-connected friends of Obama who might be able to help a (hypothetical) wealthy Syrian come to America.
What makes his story credible? O’Keefe HIMSELF is up-front about that money having been returned one month later:
In the effort to prove the credibility of the undercover donor featured in the videos and to keep the investigation going, Project Veritas Action made the decision to donate twenty thousand dollars to Robert Creamer’s effort. Project Veritas Action had determined that the benefit of this investigation outweighed the cost. And it did. In an unexpected twist, AUFC president Brad Woodhouse, the recipient of the $20,000, heard that Project Veritas Action was releasing undercover videos exposing AUFC’s activities.
He told a journalist that AUFC was going to return the twenty thousand dollars. He said it was because they were concerned that it might have been an illegal foreign donation. Project Veritas Action was pleased but wondered why that hadn’t been a problem for the month that they had the money. —Rigging the Election – Video IV: $20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned
Contrast O’Keefe’s transparency to the ‘transparency’ of Hillary’s team:
Aides to Hillary Clinton considered a ban on bundling from lobbyists representing foreign interests, decided against it and forgot to tell the candidate.
Senior staff decided to bar lobbyists registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, FARA, from raising money for the campaign in a leaked email chain that began the day after Clinton announced her presidential bid.
They were persuaded to reverse their position after members of the finance team and a campaign lawyer pointed out how much money was at stake.
‘Take the money!!’ Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri advised.
…The discussion was included in a batch of emails stolen from campaign chairman John Podesta’s account and published on the Wikileaks website Sunday.
Marc Elias, general counsel to the fledgling campaign, told his colleagues early in the April 2015 conversation, ‘This is really a straight up political call.’
He later argued that bundlers in that category should be approved on a case-by-case basis.
Jesse Ferguson, a senior spokesman for Clinton, wanted to know just ‘how much money we’re throwing away’ if they pursued an outright ban.
A staffer on the finance team determined that quite a few of the campaign’s prospective fundraisers would be ineligible under the policy – nearly 10 percent.
‘We’re consistently flagging more FARA registrants daily,’ said Karuna Seshasai. ‘In terms of # – we’re at 27 out of 370 prospective bundlers.’ —Daily Mail
Turns out Bernie had Hillary pegged all along. Too bad the DNC was more interested in keeping the ‘gravy trains running on time’.