Reformed Never-Trumper Mark Levin blasts the Media (D) about their handling of the Trump video.
Levin calls out the hypocrisy of the ‘Praetorian Guard’, the despicable Media, that relentlessly defends the Democrats and despises Republicans.
Listen to Levin here:
‘There’s no defending what Trump said, it’s grotesque. I know why they’re leaking it—with four and a half weeks to the general election, on a Friday where the media are having a field day with it prior to the Sunday debate.’
After the Clinton scandal(s) what were we told to do?
MoveOn.org is an American, non-profit, progressive public policy advocacy group and political action committee. Formed in 1998 in response to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton by the U.S. House of Representatives, MoveOn.org has raised millions of dollars for candidates it identifies as “progressives” in the United States. It also runs a petition Website similar to Change.org.
Here is a ‘Short History’ from Moveon.org:
When tech entrepreneurs Joan Blades and Wes Boyd created an online petition about the Clinton impeachment in 1998 and emailed it to friends, they were as surprised as everyone else when it went viral. Although neither had experience in politics, they shared deep frustration with the partisan warfare in Washington D.C. and the ridiculous waste of our nation’s focus at the time of the Clinton impeachment mess. Within days, their petition to “Censure President Clinton and Move On to Pressing Issues Facing the Nation” had hundreds of thousands of signatures. For the first time in history, an online petition broke into and helped transform the national conversation.
The BEHEMOTH of a Democrat political organization is something of a ‘mobilization force’ for Democrats. The ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC party that embraces and benefits from it forfeits ANY claim to a Moral High ground so long as the do not disavow MoveOn.Org.
Baked right into its name was the Left’s dismissal of Bill Clinton’s sexual harassment (which is EXACTLY what it would have been called were the POTUS Republican or merely a Fortune 500 CEO).
The name itself screamed unequivocally that SEXUAL behavior was NOT a DISQUALIFYING factor in a political leader.
But now, there’s an ‘R’ after the guy’s name.
So they want to change the rules. They want to be the same ‘priggish’ judges of someone ELSE’s sexual morality that they complained the Right has been all along.
Which is it?
These two men have been scrutinized for both thier words and behavior towards women. You can hold both men to account. You can dismiss both stories as ‘old news’.
But you can’t have it both ways.